Quantitative Article Critique
Yanique Desir
South University
Quantitative Article Critique The purpose of this paper is to critique a quantitative study and to present a critical analysis on its research findings. The paper will discuss the elements influencing believability and robustness of research, including writing style, research problem, literature review, conceptual framework, research question, hypothesis, study sample, methods, data analysis and results, and discussion of the relevance and future directions.
Authors, Title, and Abstract
Kangovi, ., MD, MS, Mitra, N., PhD, Grande, D., MPA, Huo, H., PhD, Smith, R,.A., BS, and Lon , J. A., MD. (2017).
Community Health Worker Support for Disadvantaged Patients with Multiple Chronic Diseases: A Randomized Clinical Trial. American Journal of Public Health, 107 (10), 1660-1667
Abstract of this article offer clear overview of the study, by explaining what was accomplish and what was the significant of the study. (Kagnovi et al Peer Research October 2017)
Health and human services policymakers expressed the need to move from single –disease solutions to population health interventions. The need is due to a growing public health concern- almost 1 in 3 Americans is diagnosed with multiple chronic conditions and more than 65% of health care spending is for care given to this group. (Kangovi peer research October 2017).
CHW, trained laypeople who share socioeconomic background with patients, have been
The article “Effects of a Comprehensive Educational Group Intervention in Older Women with Cognitive Complaints: A Randomized Controlled Trial” provides an overview of a new educational group intervention that focuses primarily on psychological education in healthy older women with cognitive complaints related to aging. This randomized control trial study sought to investigate the negative perceptions women faced when cognitive
Shou-yu Wang MD1, Jiang-ning Wang MD2, De-cheng Lv MD1, Yun-peng Diao PhD3, Zhen Zhang MD1
This paper is an academic critique of an article written by Lautrette, et al. (2007) titled: “A Communication Strategy and Brochure for Relatives of Patients Dying in the ICU” and accurately reflected the content of the article and the research study itself. The abstract explained the article in more detail, while remaining concise. The type of research study, sample size, variables, intervention, measurement method, findings, and conclusion were all mentioned in the abstract.
The data from this research study is clearly expressed, consistent and reflective of the data. There are primary sources cited in the article, and relevant landmark studies were described and used in this
One-fourth of American citizens have 2 or extra chronic disease, and this population accounts for greater than half of of overall healthcare costs (Giovannetti, Dy, Leff, Weston, Adams, Valuck, … Boyd, 2013). Having multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) can negatively affect quality of life, ability to work, disability, and mortality. No matter the high incidence of MCCs and corresponding terrible results, the care for individuals with MCCs is often fragmented, incomplete, inefficient, and useless, resulting in doubtlessly avoidable inpatient admissions, negative consequences of therapeutic interactions, and postoperative complications (Giovannetti, et al., 2013). A Strategic Framework for improving health outcomes and quality of life developed
Fred S. Apple, PhD; MaryAnn M. Murakami, BA; Lesly A. Pearce, MS; Charles A. Herzog, MD
The author’s development of explaining the theory and validity of the research had minimum thorough explanation. The results were provided through quantitative means instead of qualitative. This is not an issue; however, this could have been studied
Ge Li, MD, PhD; Lucy Y. Wang, MD; Jane B. Shofer, MS; Mary Lou Thompson, PhD; Elaine R. Peskind, MD; Wayne McCormick, MD, MPH; James D. Bowen, MD; Paul K. Crane, MD, MPH; Eric B. Larson, MD, MPH
The discussion briefly describes the results, but it failed to restate the purpose of the study. It discusses the results with many new citations that had not been provided in the introduction. It discussed future research implications but not in great detail. One of the greater strengths of the discussion was that it discussed multiple implications for professionals to consider. Additionally, the limitations and strengths of the study were discussed in detail.
In this chapter the results obtained from the analysis of data collected (previous chapter) are discussed in relation to the aims and objectives of the study. The study attempts to answer the following research questions:
The purpose of this paper will be to present the contrasts in the type of information that was gained while reviewing two studies. The studies reviewed were a qualitative study and a quantitative study. The general advantages and disadvantages of the two types of studies will also be presented. Qualitative and quantitative studies both have a place in research, even though the two study designs take a very different approach to research. Lastly, a response will be given in support of the qualitative research being beneficial to the world of science.
Dawn E. Alley, Ph.D., Chisara N. Asomugha, M.D., Patrick H. Conway, M.D., and Darshak M. Sanghavi, M.D.
The quantitative research method is being used in this research study. Quantitative research methods are a number of statistical and mathematical tools that can be used to capture and analyze information on quantitative
Chapter two of the study contained the review of literature which offered concisely the foundation for conceptual, theoretical, and empirical framework. It also gave the precise description of the findings and conclusions of previous studies that were related to the problem
Secondly, the investigation was based on data from small sample. Eight participants are from the same university and all of them are postgraduate students. Therefore, the size and the variety of sample may limit the possibility of generalization.