Of the demographic data included in Fayette County’s profile, the indicators/variables that best assess how widespread poverty is includes, but is not limited to, population density, lack of high paying jobs, monthly rent, median household income, educational attainment, unemployment, disability with age, reported pregnancies, uninsured persons, mediocre schools, and crime rates (Center for Rural Pennsylvania, 2014).The rationale for selecting these indicators/variables is fairly simple as each indicator/variable is dependent on each other. For instance, the average household income in 2012 was approximately $49,000.00 (Center for Rural Pennsylvania, 2014). This is a significantly low average household income compared to urban counterparts.
There are almost 40,000 households, of which a fourth of them raise children, and almost half of all households are home to married couples. The average annual household income for the city is around $52,000.
Other occupations include healthcare, construction, and transportation. The average household income is $37,058, which is below the national average. This is in relation to the 20.9 % of families in this community that are below the poverty level (70806 Detailed Profile, n.d.).
("Profile: Bibb County," 2015). Of the 29.2% of the population living in poverty, they were
Of these, the cultural demographics of 98% were white and 6.4% were Hispanic or Latino (United States Census Bureau, 2014). In 2011, Dubois County provided only 0.6% of the births in Indiana and 0.7% of the deaths (Kelly School of Business, 2014). The median household income was $54,168 and 7.9% were below poverty level wen the span of 2008-2012 was studied (United States Census Bureau, 2014). The rate of poverty among children in Dubois County was under 10% in 2010(Memorial Hospital and Health Care Center & Dubois County Health Department, 2011). A 7.5% unemployment rate in 2010 was seen as well as an increase in families receiving temporary assistance (Memorial Hospital and Health Care Center & Dubois County Health Department, 2011).
A trend can be seen in the data when comparing the percentage of children in poverty to the per capita personal income of each county. As the per capita personal income decreases, the percentage of children in poverty increases. In the urban county, Travis, there was a per capita personal income of $48,562 and 23% of the children were in poverty. When the per capita personal income decreased to $31,592 in the rural county, Nacogdoches, the percentage of children in poverty increased to 29%. This happens because when the per capita personal income decreases, there is a decrease in the standard of living in the population which causes an increase in
Since this isn’t a large population in the county it is easily overlooked and not too many things are done in efforts so support or help this population. The response this population gets from the community is not much, but there are a few things to help tem out. Isanti County has a Refuge Network for abused and battered women, homeless shelter, and food shelves to ease the hardships of poverty (Isanti County Gov. Center). These resources help to support this population in Isanti County as well. In dealing constructively with this issue Isanti County also has been making efforts toward making affordable housing for low income families and seniors (Isanti County Public Health 2015). This is in efforts to help people escape poverty. The effort to help people out of poverty in this community could be greater. The county may not have a huge problem with people in poverty but it is still there and should not be over looked. There could be more resources available to people in need, one being job assistance programs to help people in poverty to get jobs. The efforts do seem to be growing in support of people in poverty but there still is plenty of room to grow
Poverty plagues the entire nation. People assume that the worst of poverty is in the midst of heavily populated areas such as New York or California. What they don’t realize is that poverty rates in Grand Forks are worse than the average poverty rates in the entire nation. And it isn’t just a slight increase, poverty rates in Grand Forks County are 150% worse than the national average. The poverty rates are ridiculous, yet there are only a few articles in the Grand Forks Herald that actually focus on poverty. I researched through the Grand Forks Herald database and came up with less than ten articles in the past 5 years that focused on poverty in the area. That’s a maximum of ten articles in 1,825 days. This report focuses on the effects that
In 2000, the median income for a household in the city was $39,514, and for a family was $49,681. Males had a median income of $14,137 versus $9771 for females. The income for the city per capita was $15,760. Around 47% of the families were below the poverty line. In 2010, the per capita income was $23,870. The median household income was $40,284. Population that was below the poverty line in 2010 was 17.5% according to the U.S. Census (U.S. Department of Commerce, Census Bureau, 2010).
An equally important factor in determining where poverty manifests itself is the economic opportunity available in a certain region. Hillbilly Elegy makes
Appalachian Poverty Poverty is a global problem, and it has existed from the beginning of civilization. Hunger, homelessness, and lack of health care are major aspects of this world-wide dilemma. Many countries are in complete poverty and a majority are third-world countries. Within the United States of America, a land of plenty, there are also pockets of extreme poverty. Governments around the world are trying to solve this huge problem.
How Can These Challenges Be Addressed. The changing of disability rates, the size of the economy and efforts at privatization may affect how much of an economic burden these programs will impose in the future. As a result, household financial wealth in the world's major economies will be roughly $31 trillion lower in 20 years than it would have been if historical demographic trends had persisted. Raising the retirement age, easing restrictions on immigration, encouraging families to have more children, and achieving faster economic growth will have little impact on this shortfall. To fill it, households and governments will have to increase their savings rates and national economies will have to allocate capital more efficiently, thereby boosting returns (Farrell, 2005).
Wake county, where I am from, in 2015 has a poverty rate of 11.7 percent. It is a lower rate than expected because I knew North Carolina had higher poverty rates than the U.S, but after research it makes sense why. Wake county has multiple populated cities with many job opportunities; therefore, allowing greater income compared to other counties. Through 1997 to 2015, Wake county had about a $10,000 to $20,000 higher median household income than the North Carolina median. Wake county is also a higher concentrated area that creates resources and accesses to those resources. Better opportunities with better pay and more resources readily available may contribute to a lower poverty rate in Wake county than others.
A growing problem that the United States is facing is poverty. Poverty affects around 46.5 million people in the United States. Poverty in America is decreasing according to the census “In 2013, the official poverty rate was 14.5 percent, down from 15.0 percent in 2012. This was the first decrease in the poverty rate since 2006.”("United States Census Bureau." 2015). One town in Pennsylvania shows an entirely different story though. For the town of Reading, Pennsylvania almost half of the population falls below the poverty line.
The term poverty is often used when referring to third world countries like Sudan or Darfur. Painful images of families suffering from malnutrition are often the first thing that comes to mind. Yet, sadly, the same struggle is happening here in the U.S. and even worse, it’s happening right here in Ohio. The Columbus Dispatch reports that three years ago the state of Ohio was 12th in the nation for food insecurity because there were so many people who did not know where their next meal would come from. Now Ohio is ranked 6th in the nation for food insecurity. Many blame the troubles with the unemployment on the state’s difficulty recovering from the recession. Ohio’s poverty rate is rising as the national rate is leveling off (Candisky, 2011). According to the Ohio Poverty Report, Ohio’s individual and family poverty rate are lower than the nation’s average. Urban areas have higher rates but there are still people living in poverty in rural areas. Rates vary between characteristics and circumstances. Many families who receive cash assistance do not usually get out of poverty (Larrick, 2014)
These things make Stokes County residents be at higher risk overall for poverty related issues like unemployment, malnutrition, lack of