Examine and Assess the Ways the State Claims Legitimacy Essay

The laborers demanded a 20%, greater protection and rights, and have the work day reduced to nine hours instead of ten. The stubbornness of the corporation would ultimately be their own defeat. The strike was becoming a substantial burden on the United States due to the diminishing amount of coal being produced. Due to this, Roosevelt decided to intervene. It is true that Roosevelt threatened the mine owners when no negotiation was met, but this would be the first time a president sided with a union over corporations. This is quite a revolutionary action for unions, because Roosevelt heard the people’s voice and answered. The owners agreed, and the workers got the terms the union had been fighting for. Roosevelt is known to be overly expressive, so he also convinced Congress to pass the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906, and the Meat Inspection Act. Congress was cautious in passing these acts due to the amount of influence the meat industry had, but Roosevelt was the man that convinced Congress. These acts protect

Strikers were blacklisted and put on a do not hire list to prevent them from working again The aftermath of this even was to create the National Guard, whose main purpose is to enforce order at home and protect Americans against foreign threats

contributed a strike dictating higher wages and cut on hours with an acknowledgment of their union by

This controversy is connected to sociology in many ways. As stated in the PowerPoint, society is a social organization which is made possible

This story is a literary sample that gives us a system of Government, where the law was created with the intention of limiting the individuals and turning them into beings with actuation equality, controlling them through the transmitters or obstacles in their body for that people could not exercise freely their natural abilities and any kind of right view.

The national government’s original purpose was not to govern the states, but instead to monitor them and provide them with protection. During this time period the nation was run under the principle of Dual Federalism. Which meant that both the national and state government had an equal amount of power. However, over time the national government gained a grand amount of power while the states lost power, turning the once proud self-governed “countries” into nationally governed states.

There were 3 significant strikes; the Great Railroad Strike 1877, Homestead Strike 1892, and the Pullman Strike 1894. Each one fighting an unfair inequality against the American citizens and workers. Railroad strike lasted 45 days, causing millions in lost property damage and lost revenue because there was an economic panic around the time to wages being cut. The Homestead strike had to have 300 Pinkerton Guards hired to remove them from Carnegie steal, they were holding a sit in protesting their 80hr work weeks, dangerous conditions, and wages. And last was the Pullman strike in which workers were protesting their wages being cut but still being forced to live in a company town in which the prices of food/housing remained the same. This turned into a nationwide strike and was considered the worst economic panic up to that point. While these companies were doing great things for the US, creating railroads to connect the east and west coast, and their own steel, there were still injustices hiding underneath all the money that the owners and government constantly overlooked.

The “state” is best understood in relation to a government’s power, influence and involvement with citizens’ rights in a given territory. The larger the state the more involved it is in the lives of its citizens.

From here, came the Great Strike of 1877. According to Fredrick Kunkle of Washingtonpost.com, “The Great Railroad Strike of 1877 began in Martinsburg . . . when railroad workers responded to yet another pay cut by shutting down the yard. Violent clashes broke out, and from there the trouble raced along the great railroad lines into Baltimore, Pittsburgh, Chicago, and St. Louis, building in ferocity as it went” (1). Kunkle adds, “By the time the strike was put down, an estimated 100,000 workers had taken part and about 100 people had died” (1). However, this disturbing event would never have taken place without John W. Garrett’s signature. “The spark came when John W. Garrett, president of the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, signed off on a 10 percent wage cut,” says Kunkle (1). This ‘Great Strike’ gave a brutal example to the consequences that might follow injustice in the workplace.

At times confuse is made among state and Government and the two words are used on the other hand. Government is an instrument of the state through which it does its inspirations. A state, as we have seen, is a politically dealt with and geographically obliged collection of people that has the benefit to use constrain. It is a reasonable substance in this manner ought to have an instrument through which to work. Government is such an instrument. Each one of the nationals of a state are not part of a government (Shobeiri, S. M. 2007).

INTRODUCTION: According to Politics in States and Communities (Dye and MacManus, 2009), government in the constitutional form is primarily about conflict resolution. It exists to find solutions or at least to set parameters for implementing solutions within strict limitations. At the state and local levels (which operate together under state authority), governments have the freedom to address issues and conflicts very directly through the governance policies and restrictions they put in place. For the federal government, however, decisions are tied more directly to what the US Constitution says or what it has been interpreted to mean, and it is very difficult to change.

This book, “The Rise of the States: Evolution of American State Government,” by Jon Teaford, is his explanation of how the states have changed positively and negatively throughout the years. Each state has control over their citizens living in the state differently. Teaford addresses these issues in the form of his own discussion and explanations. Teaford begins with a background of the United States and different series of events that unfolded from the mistreatment of the national government to it’s citizens. I enjoyed the quote by Roscoe Drummond, “Our federal system of states no longer exists and has no more chance of being brought back into existence than an apple pie can be put back on the apple tree.” This is a great explanation of how the national government has changed vastly within history.

State is commonly referred to either the present condition of a system or entity, or to a governed entity, such as a nation or a province. The state itself consists of the society, government as well as the people living there. Before the Second World War, State is often seen as the main actor in international Relations as it can declare states of wars, control most of the economic influence within the region and larger states often dominant the role of international relations within the region or even in the globe. However, after the Second World War, the impacts on state influence as an actor has become less important than before, regarding to this point, there is

And so it helps the Government in formulating suitable laws. In pursue its economic and social policies for e.g. law and legal propositions are not find or absolute. They are in the state of becoming. Accepted norms or principles whether statutory or as principle of justice, equity and good conscience are applied again and again to test its voracity or

It has often been said that relationships between states lack order. This work will explore this idea through an examination of class text and the theories within it. One must first ask how it is possible that the "state" the central authority responsible for governing and establishing a sense of "order" in both micro and macro level issues of sociology could create relationships with other "states" that lack order. This work will argue that this lack of "order" is seen in the political with regards to the establishment of authority internally and externally and in the social with regard to variations in acceptable social order or the ways in which the populous of one state is expected to act or is allowed to act by force of social norms and the legislation of them and its lack of accordance with other states legislated social norms. These issues are fundamentally separate, i.e. the political and the social and yet they are also not mutually exclusive as they individually influence one another to a large degree.