Evidence Of Macroevolution

The Thurmond Rule is an informal and somewhat amorphous rule in the United States Senate regarding confirmations of judicial nominees. While it originated with former Senator Strom Thurmond's opposition to President Lyndon Johnson's nomination of Justice Abe Fortas to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in June 1968, the specifics of the rule vary between sources. Thurmond himself said that no lifetime judicial appointments should move in the last six months or so of a lame-duck presidency.[1] In the last year of George W. Bush's second term Democratic Senator Patrick Leahy stated the rule as meaning "judicial nominations do not advance in the Senate in the latter part of a presidential election year without the support of Senate leaders

Could not explain the Cambrian explosion, all life forms appeared or disappeared, completely formed totally devoid of transitions.

When it comes to the origin of life, most of us will readily agree it is an important question that we think about. Where this agreement usually ends, however, is whether it was created or if it has evolved. Some are convinced it evolved while others maintain it was created. Throughout his article, Millstein defends Evolution while discrediting Creationist views. He continually emphasizes scientific findings.

Because of aspects like how someone was raised and what type of culture they lived in, individuals interpret the Bible differently. This means that even if an individual believes the Bible is the inherent word of God, they may not have the same beliefs as someone who declares the same claim.

Courtney Knowles Relg 202-1: Vandergriff January 13, 2015 Tuesday/Thursday 2:00 pm--3:20 Is the Bible True? By William C. Placher Placher starts of his article with stating different claims that come with the Bible. The claims that we have heard our whole lives: what the Bible states is completely true – so we automatically believe it. It also states another claim is that everything stated in the Bible is true so we should be able to trust it. From my personal view I was brought up to believe these same things.

It has been discovered that more than forty percent of Americans deny that humans evolved from other animals and think that the earth is only thousands of years old instead of millions of years old. These kind of people are known as the “history deniers” or the “ 40-percenters” throughout this book. Many preachers agree that evolution is true and that Adam and Eve are just a ‘symbolic’ meaning will never actually mention that in a sermon. The purpose of this book is to reach those history-deniers and those who know

The reason that the Bible was created because the stories and books in It was chosen because it taught some sort of lesson that related Christianity and showed examples of what to do and what not to do to please the God. The Bible is a collection of books that were written thru out the ages, it wasn't until (referring back to the first discussion question and my opinion on it) J,P,E,D turned the first five books of the Bible into the Pentateuch. It could have been verbally and physically written by Moses. This started the creation of the Bible by gathering stories that relate to God, that would teach lessons to help them understand God and Jesus. So the Christian followers could read these philosophical lessons at any point in time.

I am going beyond my facts and I admit it, but so have the advocates of the contrary and they have been doing it for many thousands of years. (Watson).

In the story Canterbury Tales The prologue Chaucer explains how he really feels about how things are being ran and how things in the story make him upset about certain places. Chaucer is a man of his word, he likes taking people for his made up stories and make the characters say things that could get Chaucer in trouble, so his made up characters say them so people who get upset by them don’t come and beat up Chaucer. There are three types of places that Chaucer likes using satire. He uses satire in the church, men ruled over women and the difference between class.

oh, 99% believe in evolution do they? Further, I believe in evolution I just don't see the evidence for macroevolution.

The bible is a book, used as a guide, and the vital proof of the faith of many

The first 39 books of the larger work called the Bible, is called the Old Testament. The Bible itself is arguably the best selling and most read book of all time, yet it’s well known to be quite challenging to read through and understand. The Old Testament portion of the Bible, notably the most difficult portion of the Bible for most to study and follow, yields 39 books from multiple authors, and spans over 4000 years of crucial world and church history. If that were not enough to take on, the Old Testament comes our way through multiple styles of authorship and formats, including but not limited to, books of history, law, proverbs, ethics,

Yes, I agree that the Bible is a divine-human book. God uses various authors and genres over an extended time period to bring His Word to humankind. Though this special book has several authors and is written over a considerable time span, the completed book is still one with a cohesive message regardless of the fact that it had multiple authors in different societal structures, political climates and time periods. God allowed these authors to capture the revelations that He gave through His Spirit and preserve it throughout the generations. Additionally, the Bible has not only been substantiated by ancient sources, modern day archeological findings, but also by the prophecies that have been fulfilled and are still being fulfilled today.

Evolution has been debated for many years. Most scientists assume evolution to be true, but it is not officially proven. Evolution is known as “fact and theory,” because it is a fact that organisms have changed over time, but the mechanism that changes those organisms is uncertain. One of the major debates regarding evolution is the belief in creationism. Creationists believe that the Universe and organisms on Earth were all created by a divine power. There are also some theories in which creationism and evolution coexist. One idea is that the divine being who created the world used evolution as a method. Another idea is that science and religion are actually the same thing and religion explains the unknown parts of science. For example, science says that the world couldn’t have been created in seven days, but one of God’s days may not be the same length

In 1859, Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species, introducing the theory of evolution. One hundred and fifty-six years later, scientists still accept this senseless philosophy. House Majority Leader Tom DeLay states, “Our school systems teach the children that they are nothing but glorified apes who are evolutionized out of some primordial soup” (Snyder). Schools worldwide have presented exactly this to the young, impressionable minds of your future doctors, engineers, scientists, and presidents. They assure us that if we give a small amount of mud enough time it can, by itself, bring about the art of da Vinci, the plays of Shakespeare, the music of Mozart, and the brilliant mind of Einstein.