preview

Evidence Based Practice Proposal : Literature Support

Better Essays

Evidence-Based Practice Proposal: Literature Support The literature review studies discuss the recurrent issue of higher and lower staffing ratios and how they affect patient outcomes. The studies show how several factors affect the nursing workload and the adverse results of the patients. The information is investigated under several methods that range from level one to a level five on the pyramid. The extensive research studies provide the support and the evidence on the issue needing change. Search Methods The evidence found, was focused on issues with staffing ratios and the adverse effects on patient outcomes. The research data was obtained by observational studies or cohort studies, cross-sectional studies, mixed method studies that …show more content…

The research article was written by MacPhee, Dahinten, and Havaei (2017) shared their aim of study which was to understand the effect of the unit. The job and task-level workload factors on three adverse patient outcomes (medication errors, urinary tract infections, and patient falls) and two nurse outcomes (emotional exhaustion and job dissatisfaction). These higher workloads to show adverse outcomes due to staffing ratios. The research directed by Stalpers, DeBrouwer, Kaljouw, and Schuurmans (2015) explains their aim was wanting to accumulate knowledge in addition to previous studies referring to the outcome measures such as mortality, length of stay, and healthcare associated infections. To systematically review the literature and establish an overview of associations between characteristics of the nurse work environment (nurse staffing ratios and nurse-physician collaboration). Design Methods The article by Aiken et al. (2014), used an observation study approach with a cohort study; the study was during the time of 2009-2010, and the other was based over a 30-day period. The research article directed by Ball et al. (2013) used a cross-sectional study. Data was collected from January 2010- September 2010 with the survey typically in the field at each site for 12 weeks. The study by Butler et al. (2011), used a

Get Access