Evangelical Movement Research Paper

Jamestown and Plymouth Plantation are just like any other city now, they are different in many ways but still are similar in ways. Plymouth Plantation had a leader, Bradford, he was very strong and knew what he was doing because of his experiences it didn't “crash and burn”. Unlike Jamestown's leader, Smith, he was a strong leader at first and he knew what he was doing but then he left and Jamestown went bad. Both of them were sent to go explore the new land and see what is in it. When going through it there were always obstacles, but they managed to overcome it and continue with their voyage.

Evangelicalism came out of various movements that came in the Protestant church the second Great Awakening” of the 1820s-1840s, resulted in the “Christianization” of young America and the dominance of evangelicalism over the American religious climate ”.The Second Great Awakening marked a fundamental transition in American religious life. Many early American religious groups in the CALVINIST tradition had emphasized the deep depravity of human beings and believed they could only be saved through the grace of God. The new evangelical movement, however, placed greater emphasis on humans' ability to change their situation for the better. By stressing that individuals could assert their "FREE WILL" in choosing to be saved and by suggesting that

Harriet Jacob’s auto-biography consist mainly on hardships she encountered throughout her life as a slave. Jacob’s long line of misfortune starts at a young age after her mother and courteous mistress dies. Being a slave, she is then given to another mistress who is a child. Dr. Flint, the child’s father is abusive and tries to make sexual approaches towards Jacob’s. However in Jacob’s novel she is named Linda.

Fundamentalists believed in traditional Christian values rooted in the past. After World War II, fundamentalists became concerned with the morality of the country. Therefore, prominent leaders such as Billy Graham emerged to sway Americans towards a return to Christian Values where children were taught religion in schools, abortion was illegal, and women and men were married before having children. In addition, this group used politics to push their agenda; they courted and helping to elect political candidates that would legislated policies that were important to their ideals. Hence, the group was able to ensure the election of presidents, but their efforts proved misguided as promises were broken and their message was unrealized.

The main reason that I am sold on this Baptist thing is because our statement of beliefs is not a creed or confession that tries to express all of the things that southern Baptist believe but is instead broad statement that hits the main points. This is important to me because unlike some other mainline denominations Baptists do not base the whole organization around a certain theological system. Because of this the Southern Baptists allow for a minister to change his view as he grows, reads, and learns without having to leave the denomination.

In the late 1980's, David Bebbington attempted to define what it meant to be an evangelical in America. He came up with a four part definition. The definition has four criteria and they are: biblicism, conversionism, crucicentrism, and activism. He wished to find a definition that would show what unified different evangelical movements and denominations during his time. Bebbington's definition can also be applied to modern or historic denominations and movements. Bebbington's definition should fit with any church that defines itself as evangelical, but what about a modern non-denominational bible church meets that definition? Also what does Bebbington's definition say about the pre-bible belt Baptist movement in colonial America? If both a modern non-denominational bible church and a pre-bible belt baptist movement meet the definition set forth by Bebbington, then they should have some meaningful connection. However, that connection between a “evangelical” church and a “evangelical” movement is not so clear. Bebbington's four part definition is too wide and accepting to different interpretation to be called meaningful. Each part of his definition needs to be explained and evaluated to see if any meaningful connection between a bible church and the Baptist movement of early souther America have have any meaningful connection under Bebbington's definition of evangelical.

I have chosen to discuss the Christian movement known as the Prosperity Gospel. I will attempt to discuss and explain the Prosperity Gospel movement’s origins, distinctive beliefs along with the impact it has had on Christendom. The Prosperity Gospel movement began to make inroads in American culture in the 1950's. White Christians were benefitting from a post-war economy and were living, in many ways, the benefits promised by this movement.

Evangelicalism originated in 1738, with many theological sects of christianity assisting to its association. The religions that help assist Evangelicalism is English Methodism, the Moravian Church, and German Lutheran Pietism. Conspicuously, Methodists were at the seed of precipitating this new movement during the First Great Awakening. Today, Evangelicals are located over many Protestant sects, as well as in different churches not subsumed to a specific sect. Many major leaders and major figures of the Evangelical Protestant movement were George Whitefield, John Wesley, Jonathan Edwards, Billy Graham, Harold John Ockenga, John Stott and Martyn Lloyd-Jones. The movement acquired huge momentum during the 18th and 19th centuries with the Great

In the Social Order the Evangelicalism way where fulfilled by having big impacts in many ways. They group had significant affects on three aspects of American culture. One of the three aspects was the drinking habit of the people. Another aspect was ideals of women and the family. Also another aspect and probably the most important to the group were the Protestant attitudes towards a growing population of Roman Catholics.

The protestant Christianity was divided into two parts in America. They were Mainline and Evangelical. The Mainline were the liberal mainstream and the Evangelical were the conservative evangelical. The Evangelical was the most powerful Religious force in American society during the 20s of the last century. The status of the protestant evangelical as the mainstream had greatly declined once. This change was caused by the impact of the modernization

The Baptists and Evangelical methods were becoming fast-growing religions in the country. The Evangelical instinct favored average people over privileged and high classed people. The reason to this was their belief that deliverance was more important at the moment. Evangelical churches were determined by the idea of travelling from place to place. It also included the Calvinist tradition, which emphasized upon the thought of shallow corruption of the nation. Their idea was that a single could only be rescued through the assistance of God. Otherwise, the new evangelical settled their belief that an individual could claim their “free will” in determining to be relieved. By that suggestion, the salvation was wide-open to

Evangelicals think that they have more to share than to find out in a spiritual dialogue (32 percent vs. 17 percent).

The writer of the book of Ecclesiastes is correct, “What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.” (Eccl 1:9). It is especially true in America. Racial and ethnic divisions appear to be just as wide as they were during era of slavery, Reconstruction, and Jim Crow. Within the past century, Christianity in America, particularly Evangelical Christianity has endeavored to address social issues like racism but unfortunately has been relatively unsuccessful. Evangelicalism, particularly white evangelicalism must expand their understanding of cultural engagement to include more than abortion and homosexuality. To be relevant, and maintain any semblance of integrity, evangelicalism must apply different strategies regarding racism, classism, justice, and equality. As an African American evangelical preacher, I believe that Scripture had more to say about liberation other than the famous words in Exodus, “Let my people go!” The question is how is an evangelical who is committed to the sufficiency of

Emerging church adherents see a “cultural shift from knowledge to experience. The traditional evangelical view begins with facts which influence belief, which influences behavior, the emerging church begins with experience which influences behavior, which influences belief.[12] Thus the emergent church places a geat “emphasis on truth.[13]

According to Bill Hull, “While certain pockets of evangelicalism have grown, overall, the church is in a decline. Many congregations can attest to Hull’s assessment, in that, churches in America are indeed experiencing sharp declines in its numbers of baptisms and church attendance. Over