There is an economic benefit when it comes to euthanasia. It lessens hospice bills, reduces a financial burden, and it puts more focus on other patients. Hospice care can be very expensive. In 2010 Medicare paid an average of $10,700 per patient, roughly $151 per day (Fay). With euthanasia the patient has the option to reduce or even eliminate hospice completely. It is up to the patient to choose whichever option. Another benefit is that it reduces a financial burden, this goes along with the lessening of hospice bills. Some families do not have the means to cover such large medical expenses, so it would help put an end to it. The last benefit is that it helps put more focus on other patients. If there is a patient that can not be cured and
There are many arguments in favor of Physician Assisted Suicide. Many illnesses like certain types of cancer, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, and ALS may result in slow agonizing deaths. Many patients decide to use physician-assisted death because it relieves them from a tremendous amount of pain and suffering. A patient knowing that they’re going to die and that the pain is only going to get worse causes them to choose this decision. There’s no reason in letting a human suffer until they finally give out. “When death is the only way to relieve suffering, and inevitable regardless, why not allow it to come in the most humane and dignified way possible?” (Bender 21). Another pro is that health care costs are reduced. Medical care
However, when the patient has chosen the date and time of their death this gives families ties to adequately prepare and grieve. V. There is also the financial benefit with voluntary active euthanasia. According to an article written by the new England journal of medicine in the united states 30 percent of the Medicare budget is spent on the five percent of people who die within that same year, and as the patient gets closer to death the costs associated with keeping them alive becomes ridiculously expensive and often the total cost of care is not covered by health insurance leaving some responsibilities on the family. With euthanasia patients, can avoid this immense financial burden by opting out of this expensive life sustaining
The economics of treating a terminally ill patient is normally at an astronomical cost and the problem is that the patient will eventually die. Comparing the costs and the benefits of Physician assisted suicide, it is acceptable to say that the benefits far outweigh the costs.
Another pro is death by dignity. Usually for people it is very degrading to have everything done for them by nurses or family members because then they feel like a burden so euthanasia puts those people in control of their life and let’s them make a decision that changes their lives and the lives of their families. It’s much easier for families to let go of someone that they know won’t suffer in death and it’s easier for the person dying because then they know that they aren’t burdening their family members. People who are terminally ill and choose the path of euthanasia also save a lot of money because they’re not using up the medical facilities that they normally would. This lessens the burden once again on the family and the patient as well as the hospital. Lastly, euthanasia gives the individual a freedom of choice and allows the person to take control of their own life rather than being unstable and having to be at the mercy of others. This gives a sense of peace and hope to the patient and their family because they’re making their own choices and deciding how they want to carry out the rest of the life they have
Medical support for someone who is terminally ill is never cheap. The Journal of the Royal Society of medicine claims, “Annual expenditures for hospice and home care—two healthcare segments that are closely involved in the provision of end-of-life care—are about $ 3.5 billion and $ 29 billion, respectively. (cite)” Physician assisted suicide also has a cost, but it is not near the same amount it takes to keep someone on hospice till the end of their life. According to the Vermont Alliance for Ethical Healthcare, “The cost of the lethal medication generally used for assisted suicide is about $35 to $50, far cheaper than the cost of treatment for most long-term medical conditions. (cite)” Not only would this save money for families, it would also save money for the government. The government could put the savings toward better palliative care for the patients who choose not to go with physician assisted
A person who is suffering from a terminal illness will have constant medical bills. According to Nathaniel Pallone, the average person should only incur $1,000,000 in medical bills in their lifetime. In Pallone’s article, he explains how an unnamed person watched his wife die before him and how he could see the terror in his wife’s eyes. In just nine years this guy has paid $631,027.46 in medical costs, which is getting pretty close to hitting the lifetime cap of $1,000,000. That’s only in nine years, imagine if he could have kept his wife alive longer. Just because a person dies from a terminal illness does not mean that the medical bills will just disappear. All the bills from the surgeries, radiation, and chemotherapy will still be there. This is another instance where I would definitely say yes to physician assisted suicide. Not only do I want my family to remember me in the better part of the terminal illness, but I do not want to leave my family with the medical bills after I pass. I would look at this the same way if it were my mother. Of course, a person wants to be selfish and keep their loved ones alive, but you need to let them make their own choices, it is their body after
The biological definition of life is the ability to grow, respond to stimuli, reproduce, metabolize, adapt, and breathe, but is this really living? Living is more than the functions humans are capable of carrying out: it is the many different experiences one encounters, the emotions from everyday life, and the bonds of family and friends. Every human being has the chance to enjoy these parts of life, but what if it was taken away. A man is no longer able to talk to his wife and kids, experiences of eating delicious delicacies cannot be enjoyed because this man can no longer ingest solid food, and dreaming about how happy he is walking his dog is all that is left. For now, all that is left is the short walk to the bathroom which cannot even be made. This is what may happen when one is diagnosed as terminally ill. So, why make
Pereira). Euthanasia is also beneficial for our economy. Back to the palliative care option, it is in fact very expensive to pay for the funding for this type of care. Life.org states that “Healthcare funding allocations, shortages of beds and nursing staff, as well as an increasing elderly population in the future, will undoubtedly influence policy makers and doctors to look at euthanasia as a means of cost containment.” The fear of becoming a financial burden on loved ones is just one of the reasons why “right to die” advocates believe euthanasia should be legal. And I agree, the pros of physician assisted suicide outweigh the cons. Economic cutbacks in health spending pose a major threat to those who are medically disadvantaged. If assisted suicide or euthanasia became legal, once the public had been de-sensitised to the whole idea, it would then increasingly become a method of cutting costs for health care providers. Besides the economic benefits, this practice is beneficial to human sanity. The modern world is still full of sufferings and pain. Present diseases, very often incurable, make people’s life intolerable, steal the sense of life and create a strong will to die. Even with the rapid development of medicine, not everyone can have the possibility to save their life or to relieve their pain. Jack Kevorkian says that “dying is not a
It has been argued that for people on life support systems and people with long standing diseases causing much pain and distress, euthanasia is a better choice. It helps in relieving them from pain and misery. In cases like terminal cancers when the patient is in much pain and when people associated with them also are put through a lot of pain and misery, it is much more practical and humane to grant the person his/her wish to end his/her own life in a relatively painless and merciful way.
Assisted suicide was invented by Jack Kevorkian in the 1990’s .He helped more than 130 terminal ill people die between 1990-19898. Today only five states legalized assisted suicide these state are: California, Oregon,New Mexico, Washington and Vermont. 1 in 6 people in todays world live in a place where assisted suicide can actually be preformed.
This is why Euthanasia is important and summarizing the research that I found on Euthanasia. Euthanasia is important because there is a lot of arguments about Euthanasia. Some people support it and some people do not support Euthanasia (Euthanasia and assisted suicide- Arguments). Euthanasia allows people to be free from physical pain. It is the hastening of death of a patient to prevent further sufferings (Euthanasia Revisited). The religious argument states God chooses when human life ends. Euthanasia also causes mental suffering because they are in physical pain or they are experiencing with terminal illness. It is a debatable issue. There are many different opinions on Euthanasia.
The benefits are numerous in that the person euthanized would cease suffering, and the families would begin the healing process from grief and/or depression from the situation.
Euthanasia is the practice of ending the life of an individual for the purposes of relieving pain and suffering. Over the years, there has been a big debate about its merits and demerits, and the debate is not about to end anytime soon. However, no matter what side of the debate one supports, it is important to consider a few facts. One, the prolonged stay in hospital is bound to raise medical costs. Two, some medical complications bring suffering and pain to the patient without any possibility of getting back to one 's normal activities of daily living. However, ending the life of a person intentionally may be treated as a serious crime in some jurisdictions. Given these facts, it is evident that making a decision about euthanasia is bound to be a challenging task. Although not everyone might agree, euthanasia is a necessary procedure that relieves the pain and suffering of the patient and rids the family and the government of expensive medical costs that would not necessary improve the life of the patient.
First of all, what is euthanasia? It is something that not many people think about until they or a friend or family member is put in a position where they might actually have to consider it. Euthanasia, in the dictionary, simply is: the action of ending someone’s life in a painless way. It seems pretty simple but in reality it is a lot more complicated, not only for the people involved but for the society in general as well.
There would be some cases when doctors will take into consideration the financial situation of the patient while deciding whether to apply euthanasia or not. For example if a patient cannot afford to pay for the continuous health treatment an immoral behavior of doctor would be suggesting euthanasia in order to save some money from this patient’s treatments. It is unethical and immoral of doctors to behave so but we should certainly consider it as a possible alternative.