preview

Ethical Dilemma Case 8

Decent Essays

CASE 8 Nurse L informs a patient of alternative medicine, after learning the patient did was not told about the other options. When the oncologist finds out the patient has changed his mind about treatment and chooses to do alternative medicine due to what the nurse told him, the doctor wants the nurse license revoked and says that she was unprofessional. In this case, the reader can see that doctor believes the nurse had no right in telling the patient about his other options. Also, it is made clear that the doctor does not tell advise the patient to all of his options; the doctor limits him. The night felt it was her right to tell the patient his options because she would be following the rules to informed consent. In the case the doctor, …show more content…

Nurse L, should have been there for the patient and help the patient get through his treatment. In her option, the nurse needs to know he role, so that the role of the doctors and nurses are blurred to the patient. That will help the hospital run smoothly. With the nurse informing the patient about the other options, it caused friction between the two, which could make the work event hostile in a way. If the nurses stuck to their role of providing the best care and being there emotionally for patient, then the doctors could do their role in giving the patient the best treatments and assisting it serious medical situations. With nurses stating their options or informing patients about things that were not discussed with doctor could cause the patients throughout the hospital to distrust authority and start to question the professionals who are only trying to better their …show more content…

For instance, if the doctor just continues to explain to the patient all the possibilities without worrying about the outcome that would Kantian. However, if the doctor is stuck wondering if he should tell the patient’s boyfriend because he is worried about the future for the patient. That is an example of utilitarianism. The doctor is worried about the greater outcome and the great trust they have established. Whereas with the Kantian prospect, it is about being one hundred percent honest and not worrying about the outcome. Overall, the doctor would not be hurting anyone if he did not tell the patient the extra information. In a way this sernarial, fits into the harm principle. Same how the patient took it hard about him having HIV, the same thing could occur to the signicant other. If the signicant other has already be infected and does not know, the illness would manifest and cause the person to be very sick or face life or death

Get Access