Evidence Trial Report On Thursday, July 23, 2015, I attended a trial at the First Judicial Circuit for the State of Florida. This trial was held in the M C Blanchard Judicial Building in Escambia County. The judge presiding over the trial was the Honorable Linda Nobles, who is also the Chief Judge for the First Judicial Circuit. The prosecuting attorney was Assistant State Attorney (ASA) Tom Williams. The attorney for the defense was Public Defender (PD) Melissa Scarbrough. In this case, State of Florida v. Craig Jackson, the plaintiff is the State of Florida and the defendant is Craig Jackson. The defendant in this case was facing multiple criminal felony charges including burglary of an unoccupied dwelling, grand theft, two counts of dealing in stolen property, and two counts of false ownership for pawned items. Originally, the grand theft charge was supposed to be for the value of $10,000 or more but less than $20,000. However after the state rested, the …show more content…
Before the trial even started, the entire court house was evacuated due to the fire alarm going off. After the building was cleared, we were allowed back in and returned to normal operations. I stayed for half a day of the trial in this case. My first initial observations were that the lawyers from both sides were rather friendly with each other and talked as friends. I also noticed a difference in the way the lawyers performed during the trial. ASA Williams was very calm and collected, very well versed, and did not appear to react in any negative manner when the defense made an objection. In my opinion, PD Scarbrough did a mediocre job during this trial. She appeared to be nervous when she spoke to the judge or the jury, and also when the prosecution made any objection she appeared to get flustered rather quickly. In my opinion, the judge handled the trial extremely well and I feel that she ruled correctly when she made her
The Emmett Till murder shined a light on the horrors of segregation and racism on the United States. Emmett Till, a young Chicago teenager, was visiting family in Mississippi during the month of August in 1955, but he was entering a state that was far more different than his hometown. Dominated by segregation, Mississippi enforced a strict leash on its African American population. After apparently flirting with a white woman, which was deeply frowned upon at this time in history, young Till was brutally murdered. Emmett Till’s murder became an icon for the Civil Rights Movement, and it helped start the demand of equal rights for all nationalities and races in the United States.
Famed Confederate General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson’s legacy is hardly easy to define. His is most remembered for cunning speed and brutality in battle and many consider him without equal. The same strategies Jackson used in the Shenandoah Valley campaign were scrutinized by both Rommel and Patton for inspiration in WWII. Jackson’s personal discipline carried over into his command. Although his men were often barefoot and near starvation, he pushed them forward into battle, not wishing to sacrifice the element of surprise. Many of his battles were actually waged on Sundays which contradicts Jackson’s steadfast devotion to Christianity that many attribute to fanaticism.
The history of the United States is bursting with instances of extreme racism, discrimination, segregation and prejudice. The gruesome murder of Emmett Till, a 14-year old, Chicago teenager shined a light on these subjects. The Mississippi Trial of 1955 which was the trial held for Emmett Till’s murder, became a sensational case that was watched and followed around the United States. The response followed by the trial would shape the history of racism in the United States, catalyzing many civil right movements, protests. Without massive coverage of the event through the Chicago Defender, the trial never would have become famous, leading to an enormous draw back in civil right movements both at the time and throughout history.
Judge Johnson was very respectful to the defendants and their attorneys. He read every case’s documents thoroughly, talked to the defendants and their attorneys respectfully, made sure he interpreted the law wisely, gave every party a fair hearing, and enforced the law with love and
One of the most famous and publicly known cases of all time is the OJ Simpson murder case. This case was publicly announced for many years. It was very popular because not only was O.J. Simpson a famous former American football star but also an actor that had been accused of a very serious crime that changed his life forever. Although the case was publicly announced, many people don’t know many of the specifics about his early childhood, his athletic career and most importantly about the famous murder trial.
Emmett Till a native of Chicago had no idea that his life would tragically end while visiting family in Money, MS. The death of Emmett Till had a major impact on the already rapidly growing Civil Rights movement (www. Biography.Com). Till’s death gained national attention to the small town of Money, MS after Till made a choice to make hissing gestures at a white woman. Till’s death was just one of the hundred deaths that were occurring in African American men and women of color.
The criminal trial process is an interesting process that takes place in Courtrooms all across the United States and throughout the globe. This study intends to set out the various steps in the criminal trial process in the American justice system. A trial is described as a "legal forum for resolving individual disputes, and in the case of a criminal charge, it is a means for establishing whether an accused person is legally guilty of an offense. The trial process varies with respect to whether the matter at issue is civil in nature or criminal. In either case, a jury acts as a fact-finding body for the court in assessing information and evidence that is presented by the respective parties in a case. A judge presides over the court and addresses all the legal issues that arise during the trial. A judge also instructs the jury how to apply the facts to the laws that will govern in a given case." (3rd Judicial District, 2012)
March 25, 1931, nine men hopped on to a freight train of no return (Uschan 10). Unjust, prejudice, and racist the Scottsboro Trials, were definitely not just another ordinary case. The Scottsboro Trials changed how America viewed segregation. The nine young men, who hopped onto that train that day, were innocent and harmless. The Scottsboro Trials revealed the unjust treatment that African Americans faced outside of the Harlem Renaissance and changed views on segregation.
It is the right of every citizen in this nation to have his or her case decided by a fair and impartial jury. The selection of the jury panel is one of great importance and one that can have a great effect on the outcome of the case. Therefore, it is obvious that the attorneys have a
In 1987, Kohlberg, Kravis Roberts& Co. (KKK) won control of the company and they turned it private.
a. $50 and the defendant has previously been convicted of any grade of theft; or
Jackson v Attorney General (2005) is an important constitutional law case in the UK. But what made Jackson v. Attorney General particularly significant, is the dicta relating to some constitutional matters mentioned by the judges in relation to parliamentary sovereignty.
After dinner Jackson made it 50 ft before tiring and turning around to walk back to his room, keeping his right hand on the wall the entire time to keep from falling down. He thought about what he’d done four days ago when he forced himself out of bed to rescue the people on his hospital floor and wondered how he managed to do it as tired as he was at the moment, along with how he survived and didn’t get himself and everyone killed, he really pulled of a miracle that day and kept up his reputation intact of pulling off the impossible, but boy it really
Arguably, the criminal court is the most important aspect of the criminal justice system. After all, “[t]he criminal court is the setting in which many of the most important decisions in the criminal justice system are made. Eyewitness identification, bail, trial, plea negotiations, and sentencing all involve court decisions” (Siegel & Worrall, 2016, p. 156). Naturally, I decided to experience the criminal court in all its glory, as the court is such a focal point for the decisions in the criminal justice system. I went to the Thirteenth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida to observe [criminal trials, jury selection, arraignments, and plea negotiations…], specifically to the Criminal Courthouse Annex across from the Edgecomb Courthouse. This court was a court of general jurisdiction, which means that it was a state court that had jurisdiction over cases that involved felonies or serious civil issues that dealt with a dollar amount exceeding that set by
The victim impact statements largely focused on the alleged lack of remorse of the defendant, who was quoted as saying “well, people die everyday,” the fact the the parents of the defendant will never get to meet their potential grandchildren, and the overwhelming sadness that never would go away. The judge likely considered the 0.24 BAC, which is three times the legal limit, and the fact that the defendant was belligerent and actually assaulted one of the officers as aggravating factors for sentencing. Since the defendant was an ASU student, this case made me think of how easy my life could be forever changed because of an irresponsible decision.