Since personality is a set of characteristics that reflect, how we think and act in a given situation. As such, our personality per-determine how we relate with each other on the job. Employees with a cheerful and upbeat personality help bring a positive perspective to the workplace. In addition, the reverse is true for employees with a negative personality or “Debbie Downer personality” this personality type can have a devastating effect on everyone. Organizations that is able to identify and hire people with the personality type that matches the organization’s goal is on the path to become successful. Since it is often said that “our attitude determine our altitude”.
Employee’s attitude is affected by management and their leadership style. According to Chris Miksen in his article entitled, “How the behavior of Company Managers can affect the Behaviors of their Subordinates,” States that, managers, who are loud and abrasive cause subordinates to become loud and abrasive. He pointed out that employees who either flourished or succeed as opposed to those who do not, is due in part to managers and supervisor who guide the company.
The manner within which managers conduct their daily functions can have a positive or negative effect on employees. Managers can cause employees morale to plummet or rise. Since morale is an emotion that directly, affect job satisfaction and ones commitment to the organization. Managers and supervisors need to be careful how they motivate employee
The purpose of this assignment is to have you explore dimensional facets of, the composite hypothetical construct, “personality.” You will do this by studying, self-administering, and then interpreting and reporting on the results of, several “personality tests.”
Morale: With employees, more engaged in their work and more pleased with the corporate culture, their morale will naturally be higher. This leads to less time and productivity lost to illness, tardiness, or extended breaks and lunches.
Companies have started to use personality tests in the past five years so that they can find a potential employee’s strengths and weaknesses. If questions and answers are quite accurate and test is done properly it can help an employer to find more about person’s advantages and disadvantages. It is very important to know because one of the most important points is that most of personality tests help to recognize unqualified candidates. “Although experts warn that many personality assessments don't deliver what they promise, legitimate scientifically validated tests are helping employers evaluate job candidates to select those best suited for particular positions. Other tests are designed to measure intelligence, honesty, management aptitude and other qualities.”
Allport defines personality as ‘the dynamic organisation within the individual of those psychological systems that determine his unique adjustment to his environment’ (Allport, 1937). An individual’s unique personality traits and attributes are a powerful indicator of how he/she will interact with the work environment. The difference between average and outstanding employees can often be solely personality related. As the employee is the most valuable asset to the company, ‘selecting the right employee during the process is critical’ (Carbery and Cross, 2013, pp. 41-53)
A person’s personality trait can define who they are. Some can tell these traits by the way a person reacts to certain situations, personal or on the job. A person develop traits from the way they were raised and the environment that surrounded them. Everyone carries some type of personality trait, but no one carries any that are identical. Managers have personality traits just like everyone else. Traits are linked personally and indicates a person’s character. No one has the same feelings or thoughts. So it is vital for manager to understand their personal traits and figure a way to use them in management. These
Personality traits reflect people’s characteristic patterns of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Motivation is a factor that is highly dependent upon personality and because of this, managers must be able to recognize and respond to the different traits. Personality has been studied extensively throughout the years and researchers have found five distinct personality traits that are most relevant to organization; agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, extraversion and openness. Because of the way personality influences a person’s performance, these are
Most Employees report to work as required, undertake their tasks based on their job descriptions and they get satisfied for the good work they do. Employers should play their role of increasing the morale of the employees by remunerating them on timely basis and incorporating them into the daily business operations. This is a principle of good morale (Sornum, 2010). However, various reasons in the organization may result to low morale. The following are causes of low morale within the organization.
Personality has been inherently defined as possession of a particular set of characteristics possessed by people which influences their behaviour and reactions in different situation along with their motivation level to react to difficulties at the workplace. However, understanding personality traits and their development has been a contentious matter. Nonetheless, various theories have been forwarded to rather contribute to this contentious debate. For example employers set goals and encourage involvement with the company to have a better employee performance, which would result in higher motivation level subsequently leading to increased efficiency. Studies regarding the relationship between personality traits of a particular employee
This essay aims to analyse how personality can affect the performance of teams. This essay will also explore various theories relevant to personalities and will assess how different personalities can be beneficial in increasing team performance as well as any disadvantages. This essay will also explore how personality can affect the inter-personal relationship between team members.
The purpose of this essay is to explain how personality affects employees’ behaviours, attitudes and performance at work, how personality is measured by organisations. And using academic evidence, argue it is valuable for organization behaviour scholars to conduct personality testing before hiring new employees.
The study mainly focus on the various attitudes of employee’s in different groups and its impact of the performance if individual, group or team & organization. Further, the study also focuses on finding out the significant relationship between the attitude of employees and its impact of completion of module, work, deadlines, and target. This study is limited to the
The employee behavior is one of the most effective internal factor which affect the organization in core level. And it is how the employee react to a particular situation at their workplace. The employees are the back bone of the organization, so that the organizations’ goal can be affected by the employee behavior, that’s why it is important that we know about the factors which affects/influence employee behavior.
Countless studies and meta-analysis have been done on the effect of the individual personality on success, whether it be within the workplace or an educational institute (ETS, 2016).
The other important factor that can influence the behaviour at work is an individual’s personality. An individual with proactive personality is said to change his work environment, identify opportunities in his organisation, take action and utilize them to bring a meaningful change whereas the other individuals simply adapt, react and change according to their work environment. Most of the studies suggest a person with proactive personality
Morale can be defined as the confidence, enthusiasm, and discipline of a person to maintain a belief in an organization, goal, or oneself. Alexander H. Leighton, a sociologist and psychiatrist of dual citizenship, defined morale as “the capacity of a group of people to pull together persistently and consistently in pursuit of a common purpose” (Banerjee, 1995). The maintenance of high morale is a very important responsibility of the management team, especially within an organization that is undergoing an organizational downsize. Professionalism and productivity are more likely to flourish in an environment in which high morale is