Elie Wiesel Quote Analysis

Wiesel opens his speech with an appeal to ethos. He asserts, “Mr. President, Mrs. Clinton, members of Congress, Ambassador Holbrooke, Excellencies, friends:”(Wiesel 1). By associating himself with people in power, Wiesel builds his credibility. Another excerpt from the speech is, “In the place that I come from, society was composed of three simple categories: the killers, the victims, and the bystanders”(Wiesel 3). Wiesel further establishes his reliability by showing that he has personal experience pertaining to the topic. This experience leads the audience to believe that he is a reliable source.

1.If you were stripped of your freedom and individuality to be held in a camp waiting to die would you feel indifferent. Elie Wiesel, a Nobel Peace Prize winner and Boston University Professor, presented a speech as part of the Millennium Lecture Series at the White House on April 12, 1999 2.(Wiesel 221). President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary Clinton hosted the formal event. Numerous government officials from a wide order of public, private and foreign office attended the event 2.(Wiesel 221). Although Elie Wiesel designed his speech to persuade, it actually felt somewhat outside from its original intended purpose, as being more different.

In this speech, Elie Wiesel discusses indifference and how staying neutral can have serious consequences. Wisel uses his experience in the Holocaust to support his argument, going on to say how he felt forgotten and how the only hope he had was that nobody else knew what was happening so they couldn't help. (p.14) He uses alliteration and repetition to make his point clear, showing his surprise and disappointment when he learns that the U.S. government did know what was happening in the concentration camps. Wiesel uses his ethos to appeal to the White House and the people around the country, using his time in the concentration camps as a way to have some leverage in the issue.

The two poems “Never Shall I Forget” and “We Remember Them”, written by Elie Wiesel and Rabbi Sylvan Kamens, have their fair share of similarities and differences. These poems are both highly influenced by the Holocaust, the genocide of over 11 million people, 6 million of them being Jews, during World War II. In “Never Shall I Forget”, Elie Wiesel talks of his sufferings in a concentration camp and “We Remember Them” pass on the memory of those who died during the Holocaust. “Never Shall I Forget” and “We Remember Them” both have a shared theme of remembrance, but Elie Wiesel wrote of what he would rather forget than remember, whereas Rabbi Sylvan Kamens wrote of what he wishes to never forget.

Approximately 6 million Jewish people died in the Holocaust. The speaker's name is Elie Wiesel. He was a Holocaust survivor. Elie was also an author and gave many speeches about the Holocaust. The occasion was him speaking out at the White House.

The Nobel Peace Prize recipient and Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel, in the text, “The Perils of Indifference,” uses numerous of effective rhetorical strategies in order to build his credibility and engage his audience. Wiesel’s purpose is to persuade his audience to denounce indifference and act to stop the suffering and intolerance that occurs around the globe. Throughout the text, Wiesel describes historical events during the Holocaust and how indifference allowed for suffering and injustices to continue. Nevertheless, Wiesel acknowledges with gratitude the efforts of America and the actions of the brave. Wiesel, with a hopeful tone, encourages change and undertaking to save sufferers from inhuman and woeful experiences. In “The Perils of

“Light can be found in even the darkest of times, if only one remembers how to turn on the light” - Albus Dumbledore from J.K. Rowling’s “Harry Potter” Like J.K Rowling, Elie Wiesel and Edgar Guest use imagery to reveal how they feel about the experiences they went through.

Some people decide to take different stand points in an argument and some decide to stay neutral. Is it better to choose whether to be an oppressor, victim, or to be neutral? Elie Wiesel once swore to never be silent and to speak up when humanity was suffering, to take a stand and choose a facet because neutrality would favor the oppressor causing the victim to be tormented. He explains how when people do not take a valid standpoint for what is right that the tormentor does not see what they are doing wrong since no stands are being taken. I personally agree with Wiesel, people should not have to suffer because the people of the society do not want to take a stand and subsist silence. If communities were being tormented they would want someone

I honestly agree to what Elie Wiesel has to say, “when human lives are endangered when human dignity is in jeopardy, national borders and sensitivities become irrelevant. Where ever men or women are persecuted because of their race, religion or political views, that pace must at the moment become the center of the universe.”

Elie Wiesel once said, “...Whenever men or women are persecuted because of their race, religion, or political view, that place must -at that moment-becomes the center of their universe”. Wiesel’s perspective is correct because not a lot of people understand the importance of being equal.

Amel shook his head, sighing. He looked disappointed. I had finally quelled the happiness in him. Or, so I thought, until he gave me a small smile. "I'm sure living here for as long as you have has been taxing. The people here are so sad and violent, but they don't want to listen, Cerin. Hope, joy, and love... they don't have to hide very well here. There are so many distractions, so many fake things they tell themselves, that any virtue is easily covered up. God could give us so much food, we'd never ever starve, or so enough money for absolutely everyone to live in a nice house, or even heal all the sick and raise our dead loved ones, and we still wouldn't believe in Him. But He shouldn't even have to do any of that, He already made us, and

“Never again" becomes more than a slogan: It's a prayer, a promise, a vow. There will never again be hatred, people say. Never again jail and torture. Never again the suffering of innocent people, or the shooting of starving, frightened, terrified children. And never again the glorification of base, ugly, dark violence. It's a prayer. (Elie Wiesel in Hostage)

When responding to situations in life people must consider if doing so will benefit themselves or the people around them. In circumstances that demand quick thinking people often can not form a concrete decision based on how little information and time they have. In life people frequently must try to do so through their daily battles with the people around them as well as themselves.

Wiesel uses pathos in the beginning of his speech, by using He instead of I; he is able to appeal to the emotion of the audience. Through his speech, the first thing he wants to be able to do is to get the crowd to comprehend his position in the situation. He lets the audience put themselves into his shoes, so that they can view his story from the same perspective. By using He, the audience is able to sympathize and mentally place themselves into the situation of the boy, but if he used first person, the audience would be keener to pity him and would feel some restriction when addressing opinion on the speech in fear of offending the speaker, which is not the affect Wiesel was going for. He wanted his story to impact the audience and allow them to feel what happened so they would allow for a change. By addressing it in third person, allows the audience to have no restrictions when it comes to their opinion an what they take away from it. They would put their selves in the character’s shoes, because the speaker addressing the issue would be doing the same.

The Holocaust changed the lives of many. Those that survived have many terrifying stories to tell. Many survivors are too horrified to tell their story because their experiences are too shocking to express in words. Eli Wiesel overcomes this fear by publicly relaying his survival of the Holocaust. "Night", his powerful and moving story, touches the hearts of many and teaches his readers a great lesson. He teaches that in a short span of time, the ways of the world can change for the worst. He wants to make sure that if the world didn't learn anything from hearing about the atrocities of the Holocaust, maybe they'll be able to learn something from Elie's own personal experience. Usually, a person can internalize a situation better