Elements Of Being A Good Juror

For this essay I asked my Grandma Diane questions about jury duty. She has never served on a jury but she has been summonsed to questioning to possibly be on one. When she got the summons letter she wasn’t excited, “ I didn’t want to do it, because I didn’t feel that I [had] the right to judge anyone else,” and didn’t really want to go. She got asked questions like, “Could you be impartial? Could you be fair? If “this” happened would you say that the person is guilty? Are you related to the person/persons involved? Have you heard anything about the case?,” the attorneys asked these questions because they wanted to make sure they had a jury that would make an unbiased decision in the court case. My grandma said that, “It made [her] respect what

Although juror twelve was not one of the main characters in the arguments he was the peacekeeper during these times. He would use his cheesy advertising sayings to stop the arguments. A saying he used was “Put it on a bus and see if it gets off at Wall Street.”. If his sayings didn’t stop the arguments he would use a different strategy and say something like why don’t we vote on it. The example I found of him redirecting the argument he brought the conversation back to the facts. This is when juror nine and other jurors were arguing “Let’s not forget the women across the street. She looked out the open window and saw the boy stab his father. She saw it!”. This I found to be one of the greater examples of juror twelve being the peacekeeper

Well Juror #3 talked about his own son that we see the true reason for his bias against the boy. During the trial, Juror 3 talks about how he once saw his own son run away from a fight. I remember him saying " I told him (his son) right out," I'm going bust you up into little pieces for trying." When his son was 15 he him on the face. Which clears how that this guy has huge problems with kids not respecting their father. In my understanding each Juror brings their own life problems into that jury room. We can't control our emotions, we all are human and it's normal to express feelings. One juror was hurting badly leading him to act that way. He misses his son and is very disappointed in his son for such high disrespect towards his father.

Juries are a crucial and irreplaceable part of the American justice system. The jury system has been around for hundreds of years. Our founding fathers viewed jury service as a critical part of democracy and self government. Twelve ordinary citizens make up the jury and will form a decision about the case. The jury system is still needed in the twenty-first century because it ensures the accused gets a fair trial and it promotes civic participation.

Author Seymour Wishman has a well-regarded background in the law system as he has practiced criminal law for both the defense and the prosecution during his career. Wishman’s purpose for writing this book is to educate the average American about the process of the jury system. Wishman also makes it a point show the average American the perception of being in a jury and how they perceive others. Many Americans have minimal knowledge of the United States legal system. Wishman seeks to educate the average American of how a jury works, what it is like to be in a jury, and more about the United States legal system.

Juror number eight is the apparent leader of the jury. He confiscates opinions from everyone and modestly gives his feedback. Likewise, if there was one leadership quality that I had to describe as juror number eights best quality, it would be his ability to listen to everyone’s opinion and seem genuinely interested in what they have to say. This is a very important quality to have, and one that makes juror number eight such an effective leader. Members of a group must feel that their opinion matters, otherwise they might stop contributing to the discussion. Moreover, this can then hinder group activity and prevent the jury from reaching a verdict. Juror number eight looks each man in the eye when they are talking, letting them know he is listening.

Juror characteristics that would be beneficial to the defendant would be to have someone on the jury who is suffering from a mental disorder or have a loved one who is controlling it with medications. Someone who works in the field of mental illness would also be a plus for the defense. When you have someone, who works with people with mental disorders they tend to have a better understanding of what type of person or illness they are dealing with. The defense will be looking for people who can be unprejudiced about the law, and will not believe that the law always makes the right decision (Hullinger April 1, 2015).

This process not only ensures due process, but it also provides the best means of ensuring an impartial jury. The process provides lawyers the opportunity to review possible jurors and gives them the opportunity to have a say in the selection process. Any jurors that the lawyers feel can be detrimental to the case, can be removed from the jury selection process.

The first juror was the foreman. He was the task leader of the group, taking initiative to sit the people down, numbering them, and telling the jurors when they could go on breaks. This juror goes over the process and rules the men will be using, and sets up the first voting. He also tries to keep the jurors on task and organized. Juror 2 is anxious man. This juror was easily persuaded to change his opinion about the case and tended to have the same opinion of the person who spoke before him. He played the role of a tension releaser which was seen when he offered the men cough drops in tense situations. Juror 3 is temperamental, opinionated, strong, loud, biased, stubborn and intolerable man. This man does not want to hear the opinions of the other jurors and is sure that the boy is guilty. He plays the part of the central negative in the group. When he doesn’t like what other people are saying he begins to yell and challenges that person speaking. He began to be dominating and blocking towards the end. Even though he did not have a statement to backup his vote, he stood alone just because he didn’t want to be proved wrong. His own problems with his son abandoning him also

The Constitution guarantees us a right to a trial by a jury in serious criminal hearings. The jury job is to weed out the facts by reviewing the evidence and deliberating on a verdict based on an agreement of three-fourths or five-sixths of the jurors (How Are Potential Jurors Selected, 2016), (How Courts Work, 2016).

To make a good juror, you would need someone who is not racist, sexist, or biased, because it would make our Criminal Justice System a lot more fair.

Yes, on race (mixture), gender (mixture), similar in back ground to you and have people from your general area. Age not necessarily because anyone can be selected to be a juror that has a driver license and registered to vote. Having this mixture should make a “fair” jury that is guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.

Jurors can oftentimes act in a way that could implicate the trial that they are sitting for by doing acts that could jeopardize or affect the fairness and impartiality of a trial by jury. This is usually referred to as juror misconduct or juror misbehavior and in the past, was mainly dealt with as contempt of court. There are several examples of juror misconducts such as communicating with someone involved in the case , researching and taking into account outside material during deliberation or conducting their own experiments outside the court.

The functions of jury consultants are to assist the lawyers in the jurors selection process. Due to the fact that preemptory challenges are limited, the jury consultants help discover bias of potential jurors. In addition, they also provide the necessary criteria

Becoming a judge is a very fulfilling and rewarding career path. With a great salary and many benefits, a judge is a great job to have. The role of a judge is to interpret the law, evaluate the evidence given, and are one of the most important decision- makers in a courtroom. Judges have to accomplish many tasks like researching legal issues, evaluating records, motions, and applications, listen to and evaluate two sides of an argument, decides whether or not the procedure is being carried out according to the rules and law, and much more. Some important qualities that a judge must have in order to be successful is to have good writing skills so they can properly write recommendations and verdicts on disputes in a manner that each side understands the decision. Reading skills are important as well because a judge has to be able to distinguish important facts from a lot of complex information. A judge needs listening skills so they can pay attention to each side’s arguments in order to reach a fair solution. Decision-making skills are also vital for a judge to be able to evaluate the facts, apply the rules of the law, and make a just decision relatively fast. Lastly, critical thinking skills are also needed in order for a judge to correctly apply the rules of the law while not allowing personal opinions to interfere with the proceedings. With the right skills and mindset, becoming a judge will have many benefits and be very rewarding.