As the population of the young United States increased more and more people hungry mouths were asking for food. Farmers had to keep up with new technology but there were also many setbacks in government policy and economic conditions. In the period of 1865-1900, there were many ways in which technology, government policy, and economic conditions changed early American agriculture.
From 1870 to 1890 railroads were more widely spreading through the west and everywhere else. This should effectively decrease the price for farmers to get his crops to market. However, this gives the many different railroad companies the opportunity to spike up prices. This got so bad in some states that government policy was written to protect the farmers.
…show more content…
In 1892 Mary E. Lease talks about the low prices in farming and how politicians mislead them and tell them decreasing prices are from overproduction(Document G). Even though Lease thought otherwise data at the time was contrary. Document A shows this. For wheat as production increased price per bushel decreased, for cotton for the most part as production increases the price per pound decreases, for corn from 1870-1885 as production increased price decreased. 1900 in the outliner because production increased and so did price. This is way in Document J farmers are against the gold standard. Big cities were for the gold standard because it helped with industrialization but farmers were against it for a plethora of reasons. Their complaints were gold's inflexibility. When farmers brought their crop to market in the fall, an inflexible currency would cause a shortage of money which would drive down prices. Document H talks about the unpredictability of farming and how this can affect prices of the product. And based on the price of the product it depends how much food a family can keep for themselves. So not only is the production of the product to sell unpredictable but so is the welfare of the family based
As the amount of crops produced increased, the prices paid for them decreased. This is shown by the graphs, “Production and Prices, 1860-1895” In 1860, only 1000 million bushels of corn was produced, and the price per bushel was about $.65. By 1895 over 2500 million bushels
Therefore, the roads began to lose money because of all the competition, so in order to makeup for what they lost they made rail service more expensive in farming areas. Farmers hated this, not only did it make it harder for them to afford rail service but they felt that this was unfair. Document H tells the story of a man who calculated everything based on the freight rate which was two cents a pound, then when he found out it went up to five cents. “He was under contract to deliver his crop. He could not draw back. The new rate ate up every cent of his gains. He stood there ruined” (Doc. H). Farmers were very valid in their criticism of this, it left many of them with little money and in
In the period 1865-1900, technology, government policy, and economic conditions all changed American agriculture a great deal. New farming machinery had a large role in the late 19th century, giving farmers the opportunity to produce a lot more crops than they used to. The railroads had an enormous influence on agriculture. They were able to charge the farmers large fees, expenses that farmers barely had enough to cover, in order to transport their goods throughout the expansive country. The booming industry also changed American agriculture, creating monopolies and gaining incredible wealth with which the farmers simply could not compete. Economically, the monetary policy along with the steadily
Beginning in 1871, several states passed laws controlling railroad freight. The railroads fought the Granger Laws, in federal court, where they were ruled unconstitutional. The railroads regularly used rebates and drawbacks to help win the business of large shippers, and made up this loss in profit by increasing the cost to smaller shippers such as farmers. As a result, many farmers, already hurt by the depression in agriculture, were ruined. These farmers were hurt by the unfair practices of the railroad enterprise.
1. Railroads- Railroads in each area were often controlled by one company, enabling those railroads to charge what they wanted. Railroads were the only way for many western farmers to get their produce to market and high prices were always charged. Railroads controlled storage, elevators, and warehouses so the prices the farmers paid were very high.
The West had no time for that seeing as they were engrossed by the changes in the market. The market fluctuations were especially difficult on farmers. The wellspring of ranch vitality, to drive the machines and executes, was enhancing all the time from 1860. It went from men to stallions, to more grounded steeds, to steam tractors, then to the fuel motor. All the advantages that came to the American people from the American customer who were provided cheaper, ample and higher-quality sustenance all the way to the customers abroad were all because of the American agriculturists themselves.
The Populists took major issues with the capitalists and monopolies of the era. In their party’s platform (Document A), the Populists say that the land is “concentrated in the hands of the capitalists.” This prevented the small farmer from living the American Dream of building a successful life for himself and his family. A common view for farmers was expressed by James B. Weaver in 1892 (Document F), who believed that the monopolies of the era were “organized to destroy competition and restrain trade.” These large scale farms caused overproduction, causing an “alarming fall in the price of wheat (Document E).” This price fall caused a chain reaction of events that all had the same effect, small farmers being crippled by loss of income.
The farmers that relied on t the freight trains to carry their wheat cotton and tobacco to the market was located in the west and the south. But in doing this they had to pay unfair prices set by the railroad companies.
With the development of industry, the population of Americans rapidly grew. So, more people needed to be fed. But, the prices of the crop was the same, because the farmers in other countries also did same farming, which means that American farmers wouldn’t give more profit. Also, because of the improvement of railroad and machinery, the farmers needed to cost more than they were. Then, the farmers started to buy more land and to increase production. However, what they did only pushed prices even lower. As a result, some farmers became as tenant farmers, some of then became farm laborers.
A. Background: What changes were taking place in agriculture in the U.S. between 1870 and 1900?
The ability of farmers to take advantage of the new tools available to them in the 1800’s is very much tied to the progress of our country at that time. The inventions of the John Deere’s steel plow made the work of one person equal that of many people previous to that, this plow allowed a person to plant many more acres of food than previous. The invention of Cyrus Hall McCormick’s mechanical reaper allowed farmers to increase from harvesting about a half acre of wheat
In the period 1865-1900, technology, government policy, and economic conditions all changed American agriculture a great deal. New farming machinery had a large role in the late 19th century, giving farmers the opportunity to produce many more crops than they had ever been able to previously. The railroads had an enormous influence on agriculture. They were able to charge the farmers large fees, expenses that farmers barely had enough to cover, in order to transport their goods throughout the expansive country. The booming industry also changed American agriculture, creating monopolies and gaining incredible wealth with which the farmers simply could not compete. Economically, the monetary policy along with the steadily dropping prices of
The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) administers food assistance programs that help provide food for low to no income families. It is their goal to increase food security and reduce hunger by increasing access to food, a healthful diet, and nutrition education for low-income Americans (Caswell, 2013, para. 1). Some of the current nutrition assistance programs include “the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)”(Caswell, 2013, para. 1). SNAP will be the primary nutrition assistance program of the paper at hand. No matter how morally good it is to try to help reduce hunger and increase food security within the United States, there are still many questions regarding issues with SNAP. This paper will be discussing why there is such a strong support for the program, how it helps the United States as a whole, problems with the program, and why some people are against SNAP.
Until the late nineteenth century, the United States was still an agrarian community. As factories sprouted to process the products obtained from agriculture and to manufacture farm equipment, there rose
America — a land known for its ideals of freedom and new opportunities, a nation built under the idea that every man and women is created equal. However, the definition of what makes a person an American is entirely different from what it is that makes up America, itself. J.Hector St. John Crevecoeur, author of Letters from an American Farmer (1782), exposes what he believes makes an American. However, when compared to the standards of what makes an American in today’s world, it seems that becoming an American then was much simpler then, than it is today. The definition of an American is always evolving due to the influences of our changing nation. During a simpler time, Crevecoeur defined an American as someone of European