EGTRA: Tax Exemption

after 15 years, the "head tax" becomes twice and apart from this, some new rules were also

Hoffman, W., Maloney, D., Raabe, W., & Young, J. (2013). Federal Taxation Comprehensive Volume. (36 ed.). Ohio: South-W

How much did the pre-tax income increase as a result of the changed ratio in 1984?

Section 152(a) provides that for a taxpayer to take a dependency exemption, the potential dependent must satisfy either the qualifying child requirement or the qualifying relative requirement. Section 152(b)(2) indicates that the taxpayer is not permitted a dependency exemption for a married dependent if the married individual files a joint return. Pursuant to section 152(c), the term “qualifying child” refers to an individual who has not furnished over one-half of his or her own support and who has not attained the age of 19 or who has not attained the age of 24, if a full-time student, as of the close of such calendar year. The term “qualifying relative” under section 152(d) includes, but is not limited to, an individual whose gross income is less than the exemption amount and to whom the taxpayer provides over-half of the total individual’s support for the calendar year in which such taxable year begins. Under Reg. Sec. 1.152 (a), support received from the taxpayer is compared to the entire amount of support which the potential dependent received from all sources, including support which the individual supplied himself. Support includes food, shelter, medical and dental care, education, recreation,

to be taxed to pay the retirement income of elders (Halstead and Lind 79). Now in the

* Gift Tax: living transfer of property; $14,000/yr/donee exclusion ($28,000 if joint), unlimited marital & charity deduction, once in a lifetime exemption for gifts & estate of $5,340,000

| 19 |LO 4 |Dependency exemption: exceptions to the citizenship or | |New | |

How much did the pre-tax income increase as a result of the changed ratio in 1984?

addition, the company has an applicable tax rate of 40% and no unused tax loss or credit carryforwards.

As with any government program, the type of tax imposed on the taxpayers depends on the political group currently controlling the government. With a republican president in office, we are seeing the effects of the conservative philosophy: cut taxes and limit government involvement, thereby decreasing poverty by stimulating economic growth. Earlier in his term, President George W. Bush passed a major tax cut with this rational guiding his tax policy:

First of all, the marginal tax cut was one of the most significant policy in the governing of President Reagan. Starting from 1981, government reduced individual tax (the top tax rate was reduced from 70% to 50 %) and Windfall profit tax. As the Tax reform act of 1986 published, the tax rate of wealthiest Americans was decline to 28 % and corporation tax was decreased to 34%.” In addition, as marginal tax rate for wealthy people decreasing, personal exemption amount increased from $1,080 to $2,000. That means,

This is estimated using the data given in case (Exhibit 1). Considering the tax rates of last ten

Tax policy: I will need to look at certain levels of tax. If tax is

For the tax rate we took the average tax rate from 2004-2006. The tax rate is 39.7%.

Chief Justice M. Hameedullah Beg., Justice N. L. Untwalia, Justice P. N. Bhagwati, Justice P. S. Kailasam, Justice S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer and Justice Y. V. Chandrachud.