Dulce Et Decorum Est By Jessie Pope Analysis

In Dulce Et Decorum Est Wilfred Owen makes war seem horrific. When describing the soldiers, he says ‘Coughing like old

Erich Maria Remarque’s novel, All Quiet on the Western Front has a central theme of the harsh realities of war and a general negative attitude toward the subject. This attitude is synonymous of other war poems such as Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen and War Is Kind by Stephen Crane; however, the attitudes are revealed differently in all three pieces through each respective author’s use of diction, imagery, and tone.

By dictionary definition, war is a state of armed conflict between societies generally characterized by extreme aggression, destruction, and mortality, using regular or irregular military forces. For centuries, war has been used to resolve conflict, but it also has been used to create chaos. In the 70's for example, there was a big revolution against the Vietnam war. As a result of this "double standard" many individuals have multiple opinions about war and its purposes. In the two pieces "Dulce et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen and "Who's for the Game?" by Jesse Pope, each poet emulates war in various points of views to produces different effects on their readers.

The poems I have chosen to compare in this essay are Wilfred Owen's “Dulce Et Decorum Est” and Jessie Pope's “Who's For The Game?”. The two poems I have chosen to compare are both about the first world war. Yet the two poems have very different opinions on the Great War. My first poem, Dulce et decorum, is against the war and the injustice of it all. It is narrated by one of the soldiers who is fighting in the Great War and having to face the horrors of war. On the contrary my second poem, Who's for the game, is a recruitment poem.

The poems “who’s for the game” by Jessie Pope and “Dulce Et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen both were written during the period of WW1. Although both poems deal with the subject of war, the poets' attitude towards war varies radically. “Who’s for the game” is a more jingoistic poem through which Pope represents war as a fun, jovial and full of glory that any young man could earn if only he had the courage. The second poem “Dulce Et Decorum Est” was written as a reply for Popes poem, the poems sates that war is horrific, and that there is nothing sweet about fighting a another country additionally Owen states that it is wrong to lie to boys about what it would be like. Although both poems deal with the subject of war, the poets' attitude towards

The poems “Dulce et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen and “Who’s for the Game?” by Jessie Pope are direct antitheses of each other, such that their views about war, the chosen literary schemes, and the effects on the readers are exact opposites in each view. “Who’s for the Game?” is a strong pro-war poem with a simplistic rhyme scheme, basic meaning, shallow imagery, and is intended to provoke and challenge young men into joining the war. Conversely, “Dulce et Decorum Est” is an anti-war poem with a relatively more complicated rhyme scheme, complex meaning, deep imagery, and is intended to discourage those who write such propaganda as “Who’s for the Game?”.

During World War I, a collection of poems were written by soldiers serving in the war. The poems include If I Should Die by Rupert Brooke, In Flanders Fields by John MacRae, Dulce Et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen, and On Passing the New Menin Gate by Siegfried Sassoon. The poetry differs in opinion on the war and dying for one’s country from soldier to soldier, with If I Should Die and In Flanders Fields romanticizing heroic death and glory, and Dulce Et Decorum Est and On Passing the New Menin Gate showcasing the gritty truth of war and the feelings of the soldiers who experience it.

Each poet tries to persuade the reader's perspective on war by developing a distinct point of view through their language and imagery. To begin with, Jessie Pope’s poem “ Who’s for the Game?” has a particular point of view regarding war. War is depicted as an honor rather than a nightmare, and the tone of the poem is noble

In Dulce et Decorum Est… Wilfred Owen informs the reader of the physical and emotional torment soldiers go through during and after war. In the opening verse Owen describes the soldiers physical health as they sluggishly make their way through the muddy terrain. Owen makes effective use of similes in lines 1 and 2.

The poetry of World War I is an artifact of that period. There was an increase in poetry activity Wilferd Owens was a soldier that gave proof that he had shown what life really was like during the war. In Wilfred’s poem “Dulce et Decorum Est,” he talks about the glorification of war. Wilferd Owens thesis argues the phrase “Dulce et Decorum est pro patria mori” (Wilferd Owens) 639, and it translates to it is sweet and proper to die for one’s country. Which he believes is a lie or at least questions it, especially in the brutality of war.

Wilfred Owen’s porter vividly depicts the horror and futility of war and the detrimental impact of war upon the soldiers. Owen’s poem, ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’, written in 1917 depicts the horror of war as the physical and mental damages on the solders. Most importantly, the context of the poem subverts its title. In his other poem, ‘Futility’ written in 1918, conveys war as fatal and that war is pure wastage of human lives.

Wilfred Owen’s “Dulce et Decorum Est” is a poem made of four stanzas in an a, b, a, b rhyme scheme. There is hardly any rhythm to the entire poem, although Owen makes it sound like it is in iambic pentameter in some lines. Every stanza has a different amount of lines, ranging from two to twelve. To convey the poem’s purpose, Owen uses an unconventional poem style and horrid, graphic images of the frontlines to convey the unbearable circumstances that many young soldiers went through in World War I. Not only did these men have to partake in such painful duties, but these duties contrasted with the view of the war made by the populace of the mainland country. Many of these people are pro-war and would never see the battlefield themselves. Owen’s use of word choice, imagery, metaphors, exaggeration, and the contrast between the young, war-deteriorated soldiers and populace’s favorable view of war creates Owen’s own unfavorable view of the war to readers.

The popular view of war at the time is reflected in Jesse Pope’s poem ‘Who’s for the Game?’ The strong patriotic views favoured during World War 1 are portrayed in this poem. Jesse Pope was an admired propagandist. She wrote dynamic poems and stories to entrap people into the belief that signing up for the ‘Great’ War was an honour, and a ‘manly’ thing to do. In her well-received poem ‘Who’s for the Game?’ she uses rhetorical questions to make men question why

Wilfred Owen’s piece, “Dulce et Decorum Est,” slams open the doors of the ideology of a soldier’s demeanor and uncovers what truly lies in the smoke and rubble of war, specifically in the battlefield of World War 1. Wars appears to be this grand exemplification of heroism and gruesome occurrences to most. However, what fails to meet the eye is that a soldier’s life, though inglorious is an addition to that person’s being, it is a part of who they gradually become.

War Poetry Comparative Essay The saying dulce et decorum est pro patria mori comes from the roman poet Horace in Ode III.2.13, it translates back to how sweet and fitting it is to die for one’s country. When ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ was first written in 1917, it was directed at the poet Jessie Pope, then the dedication changed to ‘a certain poetess’. However, this dedication was never published as Wilfred Owen wanted the poem to reach everyone and not just Pope. Pope was a famous WW1 poet best known for her pro war, motivational poems, her most famous being ‘Who’s for the Game’. The themes in ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ (DEDE) are war, death and patriotism.