Drug Laws Research Paper

I can’t speak for the entire State of Texas but Travis County drug court is making a positive impact on offenders’ lives. Two judges who manage Travis County’s drug court are directing addicts into a court supervised treatment program instead of incarceration. Drug courts like the one in Travis County have successfully handled nonaggressive defendants with drug and alcohol addictions. People who complete drug court programs rarely fall back into substance abuse. Per four drug-court judges surveyed, about 10 percent of program graduates commit new crimes. That’s a recidivism rate of one-fifth that of traditional probation programs. Which shows drug courts can ease the strain on congested penitentiaries and save taxpayer money. A study done by

In the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, drug use became a major concern for most Americans. As the War on Drugs and “Just Say No” campaign were being thrust into the spotlight by the government and media, the public became more aware of the scope of drug use and abuse in this country. The federal and states’ governments quickly responded by creating and implementing more harsh and punitive punishments for drug offenses. Most of these laws have either remained unchanged or become stricter in the years since then.

The Drug Court: Treatment Program Feedback Survey will be made available to current participants who are in the program, prospective graduates, and prior participants who have recently failed or completed the drug court program. With current drug court participants, the survey packet will be given to them during their weekly judicial visitation. For the prospective graduates, the survey instrument will be built into graduation requirements. For prior participants who have already completed, been terminated, or dropped out of the program, surveys will be mailed to their latest address along with a prepaid postage envelope. In the drug court survey packet, there will be a confidentiality/consent form, which will need to be signed prior to taking the survey. Surveys will be made available via paper-form or online, which will be noted in the packet. Those who opt to take the survey online via the individual drug court program website will be given a user id and password associated with each participant’s name. This slip will be provided in all survey packets, making the online survey an option for whoever has computer access.

For my Civic Engagement project, I plan on studying and learning more about Drug Courts. After reading about drug courts in the state courts chapter and after watching the video, A Better Deal, about the nations first drug court, I immediately got hooked on the topic and wanted to learn more about the court in depth. Before we go more in depth about the topic, let’s take a step back and ask, “What is drug court and what is the purpose for it?” Drug court is a specialized court, meaning it is it’s own court. Drug court is a diversionary program that offers offenders a second chance to correct their drug problems and also offers an alternative route rather than going to prison for breaking the law due to their drug abuse. The goal for drug courts

Drugs. They have entered our communities, our schools, our neighborhoods, our homes. For generations now they have been affecting our society; influencing politics, laws, wars, science, and the overall structure of society. Russia and Mexico have had some of the highest involvement in drugs, and the fight against them. In Russia almost 6 percent of the total population, which is about 8.5 million people are drug addicts, or regular users. Russia has also become increasingly involved in the trafficking of drugs. In comparison Mexico has been one of the largest marketplaces for drugs, and has been a major producer and exporter of marijuana and heroine. In order to further better their countries, Russia and Mexico have implemented certain policies to restrict, outlaw, or limit drugs and the trafficking of them. This paper is going to compare Russia’s and Mexico’s policies on drugs, it will explore the history and background of both countries policies, the effectiveness of each of the countries policies, and will compare the two countries policies. In this comparison we will discover which country if any has had a more effective policy on drugs.

Drug court is a court given responsibility to handle drug addicted offenders through comprehensive supervision, drug tests, treatment services, and immediate sanctions and incentives. Drug court offers individuals facing criminal charges for drug use and possession a chance to open up to a substance abuse recovery program instead of jail time. The requirements of drug court are strict because staying clean or off of drugs is a hard road to stay on. A person on drug court is tested frequently, they must attend substance abuse recovery meetings and make regular court appearances in order to abide by the requirements of drug court. Drug court programs bring the full weight of all interveners (judges, prosecutors, defense counsel, substance abuse

Drug courts have historically been the preferred way to treat drug users/offenders. What are the requirements for an offender who participates in drug court? How does this differ from the LEAD program?

The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) gives certain bodies or individuals such as research scientists, pharmacies, doctors and manufacturers the legal right to access controlled substances.

Drug possession laws in Maryland are quite simple and easy to understand which makes them more damaging than thought.

When developing drug court programs, drug courts should combine alcohol and other drug treatment services with the criminal justice system. The two complement each other and ensures success when participants are willing.

f I had to choose only one comprehensive treatment option to fund in New Jersey, I would choose drug courts. Drug courts would be a viable choice because it's already been proven as a valid post-trial method. I would leave drug courts in the post-trial timeline because it naturally seems to make the most sense for rehabilitation. Drug court allows offenders who are non-violent to avoid jail time to receive the specific individual treatment needed. This aspect is why I think drug court is such an important choice, for it treats the offender through a custom like plan designed with their needs in mind. Drug court is an intensive program that has the ability to positively overhaul a persons life. Yet it maintains that the offender being treated,

Since no drug court follow an uniform standard model, each state addressed the issue depending on their own jurisdiction model or code with slight variation of the six requirements under Morrissey (Oram & Gleckker, 2006). In State v. Cassill-Skilton (2004), Washington state statute authorized the creation of drug courts but failed to provide the provisions for operating the treatment program. The notice requirement became the center focus of the case where the defendant was admitted into a drug treatment program but violated the terms of conditions when the defendant was charged with another offense during the course of the treatment (State v. Cassill-Skilton, 94 P.3d 407, 2004). The court terminated the defendant from the treatment program

Scientists need to heavily increase the research and studies on Schedule 1 drugs, focusing on psychedelics, to uncover their full medical potential.

Millions of people are arrested every year because of drug law violation. For the longest time in our history the practice of drug wars have led to exceptional rates of incarceration and marginalization of many Americans, targeting poor people and people of color-while failing to lower the actually issue at hand of drug use and other drug-related harms. In this paper, I will address and define the terms “decriminalization” and “harm reduction”. Also will reflect on the sale/use of prescription opiates, in parallel to the use I will identify how it effects society as a whole, by analyzing one cost and one benefit from the use/sale of prescription drugs. Lastly, I will apply a “harm reduction” strategy to the negative consequences that are

Currently, possession of less than 30 grams of marijuana is often dealt with through a fine. However, this penalty will heighten as premiers and chiefs are in favor of zero tolerance, early enforcement, and early diversion and rehabilitation. Associations are concerned about any attempts to allow the medicinal use of the drug (King, 1999). We should be eliminating any thoughts of this drug being available.