The Drouth Stricken Area was painted in 1934 by Alexandre Hogue, currently the art piece located at The Dallas Museum of Art l in the American Art section level 4. The size of the art is 30X42.24 in. It is an Oil on canvas. Just by looking at this painting, and without reading the name of the painting, I immediately see from the components of the painting there was a trouble. This painting describes the devastation period of 1930’s mainly the effect of the depression and tailed by drought. All the elements in the painting implies the trouble of the depression and the drought stark the farmers very hard. The painting depicts the abundant farm due to the drought that was symbolized by the sands, the extra skinny cow is about to die from thirst, …show more content…
The horizontal line in the middle of the painting give the art piece the trick of depth. Also, the horizontal line infers to relax, rest, sleep, and calm, thus tie the theme of the painting together. Repetition of the small lines and the wavy look on the sand by the base of the mill lead to the impression of sinking whole. Long vertical lines a long both side of the painting were also present, it depicted the illusion of moving away or leaving behind the main object which is the farm. many other lines were presented it on the sand and wood all gives the delusion of movements. Natural light was present gave the painting the feeling of warmth and shades of some of the features in the painting. The overall presentation of this painting is asymmetrical balance, but in my opinion the Hogue tried to balance the overall appearance of the painting. For instance, items that were painting in one side, were also balance by different object on the other side. Looking even further in the balancing of the painting, the shadow of the mills on the sand were balance by the skinny cow on the other side. Hogue painted a powerful image expressing his sadness of the depression and drought era. I believe he did great job depicting the struggle to survive from the past events because
As indicated by the shape in the foreground, the lines that signify the contour of the rocks and freestanding structure merge. The lines lead the eye vertically as it meets the center. When looking at the painting as a whole, the viewer can see how the artist uses straight
What do I notice from the paintings is a figure sitting all alone amidst a rainy storm as if he or she awaits change at a turning point in their life. The starkness of the painting shows the figures emotions and feelings are strong and yet there is always sunshine after the rain.
In this painting by Ross Dickinson it shows the impending fate of the rich individuals that populated the 1920s. With the mountains and smoke in the back creeping up of the green fields and houses that showed the prosperous life within it. Some areas getting hit faster than others, since not everyone during the 20s were ridiculously. Like George Wilson and Myrtle from The Great Gatsby who were still hanging on but could never afford the lavish life Gatsby possessed. Unlike them George and Lennie from Of Mice and Men were stuck in the time that was overtaken after that during the 1930s, but in the painting it would be shown as those little openings of grass that had already been overtaken by the mountains that have no homes and sign of life.
It is almost a reflection of the man’s trident. That same pitchfork shape also appears in the window of the house that sits in between both figure’s heads. Repetition can also be seen in the dotted pattern of the woman’s outfit, which also appears in the material of the curtain that hangs in the house’s window. The echo of verticals in this painting is also strong. The faces and bodies of the figures seem to be stretched, and narrowed. The pitchfork’s slender prongs and the green stripes on the man’s shirt also add to the elongation of their frame. The copious amounts of vertical wood boards that make up the house and the barn, keep the viewer’s eye moving up and down the picture plane. Wood’s use of verticality in this painting is overwhelming.
Beside the pile of straw which has a wheel leaning against it, a farmer is stooping to collect timbers. Before a thatched cottage in the middle of the painting, several farmers carrying farm tools and riding horses silhouetted in the shadows. They form in groups as if they were discussing some deliberate issues. On the other pile which sits in the other side of the sandy road, a slightly stout farmer with a straw hat is sitting on straws to have a rest. Beside him, an older villager leaning on his stick and a comparatively shorter man who is carrying a basket are talking to him as if they were pleading him for some reason. The trees extend along the sandy road in a diagonal line, creating a spatial demarcation. In the far end of the road, there is a vague tall building with pinnacle roof. The sky above, which takes up nearly half of the painting, is pale and dusty, suggesting the end of the day in a hot arid climate.
This painting used of numerous elements and principles of design. Using line showing the contrast between the animal and the floras. Also, the value (tone) and colour used containing dark and light in colours, the tone of the colour on the right of the painting is darker, and lighter colour on the left. Moreover, this landscape created an emphasis (focal point). An animal is clearly shown in the central of the landscape and creates a focal dominance.
Perturbed times in life often were the influence for Picasso’s paintings. Colors and shades were used on the paintings created to reflect all of the troublesome times he went through and how much of an effect those
From there we will notice that the painting is asymmetrically balanced. Carter placed the farmer, the buckets of potatoes, wagon and white horse on the left side. On the right is the dark brown horse and meadow. To balance the painting out carter used an implied line, by having the farmer look off to his right. This is an implied line because our eyes want to draw a connecting the drivers eyes to the far right of the painting.
Compared to other works on The Peasant's War, The Outbreak shows present most potent content in the painting. The picture shows a lot of people with knives and weapons. This indicates that causes for the peasant revolt, in wich is the abuse by the ruling class, poverty, crushingly hard work and rape of the woman. The woman with the hair band on her head, and she is standing, barefoot, and raised her hand towards the people. It seems she is fighting the right about something, calling the end of the war, or stood up for the people just like her.
The next question we usually ask ourselves is “why?” why the color, why the worn out look of the farmhouse, why the surroundings, in general why is the painting depicted like this? That brings up the need to analyze the work of art at hand. When focusing on this painting, you can see a few birds soaring over the farmhouse. They’re quite small so there’s some difficulty telling if they’re flying towards or away from the farmhouse. It is still very probable that they flew over it at some point in time though. The lines in the painting are mostly depicted in the trees, and outer walls of the farmhouse. Standing firm the trees look, and or represent strength and dominance. It makes you wonder if there’s still hope for the dead looking environment surrounding the farmhouse. When first observing this painting; the thoughts were generally negative such as; sad, abandoned, lonely, and depressing, etc. The painting is indeed centered, and the focal point is obviously the farmhouse.
The relationship in the painting between the mother and daughter give it a definite asymmetrical balance and maybe a little radial balance. A radial balance because of their eyes being the central focus, then the faces, then the holding of each other, then where they are placed on the canvas, and then the bench and the landscape. The colors used by the painter, also creates balance with in the picture. The wine colored dress of the mother, red sash of the daughter’s dress, ruby lips, and the rosy cheeks give a warm feeling to the central focus of the mother and daughter. The cool color of the sky is the same as the women’s eyes as well as the trees and green on the mother’s dress. These balances give unity or a unifying feeling to the painting, especially between the mother and daughter.
There are three main aspects of this painting, each representing a different aspect of society. The first and lower part of the painting shows the working class, gathered in desperate and impoverished lines. This shows the lack of compassion available in the American economy.
The use of line in this piece is also very interesting. The artist employs a high horizontal line to create a plunging effect giving the piece more depth. Another use of lines in the image is to create focal points to attract the viewer. Lines are also used to separate the different sections of the painting. Overall this painting uses lines in dynamic ways that vastly enhance the viewers’ pleasure and admiration of the piece.
It is an oil painting on canvas. Scale or size is big, 11 feet tall and 25.6 feet wide. Horse, Bull, woman with baby, lamp, and dead men are in the painting. I also knew that the place is Guernica, Spain, which divested by German bombing practice in the Basque town of Guernica during Spanish Civil War(3). The painting has a big triangle line. Three; black, gray, and white colors are used. Highlighted actions or expression were brightened while other parts are hidden in darkness. Maybe I think the place is wide plains of a small town but in the painting, space is compressed. It has out of perspective, and characters are viewing from multiple viewpoints. On second sight, I noticed that characters overlapped and scattered seem to reveal and tell the facts that there were many people who in agony and it makes people today recall
As some parts of background are closer to the light source than the front, they are applied with brighter hues, high in value. In addition, Millet places things like haystack, trees and farmhouse in the back, and peasant women in the front. Hence. On the basis the positions of objects, the principle of line perspective, and the relative distance to the viewer, three gleaners visually appear within a larger proportion on the painting. In other words, the front figures’ sizes are bigger than the back objects’.