preview

Dom Casmurro

Decent Essays

Dom Casmurro and Pedro Paramo also share a theme of having a narrator looking into the past. In both plots the narrator’s life is detailed; they each focus on recollections, remembering the past. In Dom Casmurro, the narrator Bento, speaks in the past tense with the ability to describe what was going on, how he felt about it and what he should have done. At times, he speaks about how he, at this point in time, should have done something or acted a specific way. This is illustrated when he describes a Monday that he was going back to the seminary when he “saw a lady fall down in the street.” With regret, he says “My first reaction, in such a case, ought to have been pity or laughter; it was neither one thing or the other” (109). He goes on …show more content…

The differences in chronology set the books apart from each other. Dom Casmurro occurs more in sequence than Pedro Paramo does. In Pedro Paramo, the story does not coincide with the exact order that these events occurred. Part of what makes this novel so puzzling and contrasting to Dom Casmurro includes the fact that the reader has to work harder to figure out the timeline of Pedro Paramo. The sections are not in the order of how they occurred in the past. Figuring out the timetable is a big part of the reader’s drive to learn more. As the story goes on, concepts from previous points in the novel are explained. For example, in the beginning of the novel, Eduviges says, “Dolores’s boy should have been my son”(11). This occurs in the beginning of the novel where the reader is being loaded with a strange, outlandish pasts and may be confused by this. The reader does not receive an answer to what that quote means immediately. In fact, this incomprehensible information continues to confuse the reader when Eduviges Dyada talks to Dolores’ son saying, “you came within a hair of being mine” (18). Currently, the reader is unaware of what Eduviges is referencing. This keeps the reader’s interest until he or she learns later that Dolores had been scared to consummate the marriage with don Pedro on her wedding night because the wedding lined up with her menstruation cycle and …show more content…

This stems from Dom Casmurro having a reliable narrator while Pedro Paramo’s narrator is inconsistent. This difference of technique allows the reader to follow a man’s past thoroughly. Through the narration of Bento, the reader is able to see how a man’s life unfolds and can understand why Bento feels guilty for ruining his marriage. The reader gets in the mind of Bento and understands his reasoning. Through the character Sacha, we are able to see how a man such as Bento, who loves his wife since they were children, can still feel attraction towards another. We are able to peer into the mind of Bento and feel his guilt when he has an encounter with Sancha and thinks, “I felt Sancha’s fingers again, as they gripped mine and mine hers. It was a dizzy moment, a moment of sin.” Here, we see that Bento is aware of his attraction to Sancha and understands that it is wrong of him to feel this way of another women that is not his wife. The reader may be able to relate to Bento as he evokes sympathy from the reader. The different forms of narration set these two books

Get Access