Kiana Clay
Mrs. Esquibel
AP Biology
17 May 2016
Does gender play a role in altruistic behavior? In the Oxford Dictionary, altruism is defined as “the belief in or practice of disinterested and selfless concern for the well-being of others.” In other words, altruism is “when we act to promote someone else’s welfare, even at a risk or cost to ourselves.” (What is Altruism?) Many stereotypes exist dictating acceptable ways of how men and women should behave, leading to the questions: Does gender play a role in whether or not one chooses to act altruistically? Is one gender expected to act more altruistically over the other? Different conclusions based upon different experimental studies have been formulated as answers to these questions. “It is gender differences in expectations about others’ giving — not differences in tastes for fairness that explain the altruistic behavior of men and women” (Rigdon and Levine), and it is dependant on the situation that determines if “women are more generous than men, or if men are more giving than women.” (Andreoni and Vesterlund) However, Andreoni and Vesterlund also found, “men are more likely to be either perfectly selfish or perfectly selfess, whereas women tend to be “equalitarians” who prefer to share evenly.” The stereotype that women should behave altruistically while it is not a requirement of men, has existed for decades. Women are expected to be “nurturing and socially oriented”, “supportive and concerned for the
Even in nature you see acts of altruism. An example is the meerkat; who participates in a cooperative breeding and feeding, and community guarding. The dominant males and females are the “chosen”, which are allowed to breed
Of charter, proprietary, and royal colonies, colonists from charter and proprietary colonies would enjoy the most freedom because they had the power to establish their own government, they weren’t directly ruled by the British government, and their rules from Britain were not highly enforced. In many charter and proprietary colonies, colonists could form their own their own governments, whereas in royal colonies, colonists were ruled by a governor who had been appointed by Parliament. Also, in charter and proprietary colonies they could elect their own officials to represent them in government, something that did not happen in royal colonies. Lastly, in charter and proprietary colonies they had rules from Britain that they were supposed to
Sarah-Elizabeth Atunrase Final Paper 5/9/18 Final Paper The two behavioral concepts I recognized in the DeWaal paper were true altruism and empathy. Altruism is defined as “altruism without obvious advantages for the actor” (DeWaal). Reciprocal altruism is the act of giving aid or preforming an act of kindness in order to receive delayed benefits or even immediate benefits (Lecture 23: Empathy and Altruism). In order to participate in altruistic acts the species must have empathy. Empathy is important because in order to perform these acts of kindness one has to understand the emotion of another and be able to imagine what someone else is going through. Dewaal discusses how altruism in animals must stem from something other than actions with
Women are portrayed to be naturally maternal and caring when men can be rugged and tough. Even in today’s society, women are looked down upon if they go out without their children or go to work and leave their children with a babysitter. The hypocrisy between men and women and their capabilities is
A theory of mind allows for other forms of altruism, reciprocal altruism, in contrast to kin selection (Clegg, 2007) is when the benefit is conveyed on another whom is not a relative and with no guarantee of anything in return. It is a gamble, the altruist must have a theory of mind in order to possess a level of trust that the benefit will be reciprocated and so is therefore a more human trait. This has been studied and observed by evolutionary psychologists using The Prisoner’s Dilemma Game (Clegg, 2007 pg. 147), the most common method used for studying altruism. Similarly with indirect reciprocity, the altruist is not guaranteed a benefit but bases his gesture on the possibility of a gain not from the person who the altruistic act was bestowed upon but from another, such as the wider community, for example, to boost one’s reputation (Clegg, 2007). McAndrew and Farrelly et al used empirical evidence to suggest that one’s reputation has a direct correlation with how attractive they are perceived to be and so therefore could have an influence on reproductive success (as cited in Clegg, 2007). Nedelou and Michod discovered a genetic element for altruism (as cited in Clegg, 2007) and as it has been demonstrated to be universal, it is probable that altruism is an adaptive behaviour.
Does gender affect how much authority one has over another? In what ways are the male gender superior in relation to “The Homeric Hymn to Demeter”? The hymn is often viewed as an explanation of how the seasons came to be. However, many overall themes can derive from the myth. It tells the story of Persephone, goddess of spring, taken against her will by Hades. Her grieving mother, Demeter, goes through great lengths to be reunited with her beloved daughter. Throughout the story a recurring theme can be seen through the divide in power between male and female.
The economic arguments for gender equality are overwhelming - but stereotypes keep getting in the way of progress. There are many reasons women are being held back from being seen as an equal to men. Women are generally perceived as more “communal”:and “loyal”, whereas men are described more as “protectors” and “competent”. For generations people believed what women should be, how they should behave and what they represent and that reinforces unconscious and unseen biases of who a women is.
if the cost of leaving was high (they had to do an onerous task if
Bartel (1976) defines prosocial behaviour as ‘behaviour that intentionally helps or benefits another person’. Batson (1987) defines altruism as ‘helping another person for no reward, and even at some cost to oneself.’ This definition of altruism seemingly depicts the behaviour as selfless, however there is a wealth of research which suggests that this is not the case.
It's the way in which they show caring that may differ from what we expect, and often see, from women. “We all develop our personal thoughts about caring”, says O'Lynn, “and if what we see doesn't fit the mold, then we don't recognize it as caring (Stokowski p.4).”
Batson, C. D. (1991). The Altruism Question: Toward a Social-Psychological Answer. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Why do we show altruism? Social and evolutionary biologists, psychologists, economists and philosophers alike have made many attempts at providing an explanation for altruism. As a result, many opposing theories have developed over the years. In this essay, I will attempt to explain altruism as the presence of an altruistic gene which is selected for by natural selection in terms of kin selection. I will explore evidence supporting this theory, as well as evidence pointing to psychological explanations such as reciprocal altruism, social norms and primitive sympathy.
Benjamin Cardozo has a strong argumentative essay against the idea of altruism. Cardozo’s central claim is if people allow altruism to be practiced in government then they will lose their individualism and their government would eventually collapse. To being his article Cardozo explains how the lower class will always dislike the upper class and that is the reason altruism has been a topic of discussion for centuries. Cardozo then proceeds to explain how the world is driven by self interest. The reason things get accomplished by people is for the reason of self interest. Cardozo explains that altruism would kill the idea of self interest and people would be less likely to be productive. Next Cardozo describes how altruism would make all people poor which would give the illusion that no one was actually poor. Cardozo then goes on to ask the question of how altruism
Humans are prenatally motivated to help those around us due to its evolutionary benefits that our species has a better chance of survival if all cooperate. Humans can also be nurtured to exhibit altruistic behavior through good parenting. Although most of the population agrees that altruism benefits society, scientific research has shown that even those who believe they are altruistic are not when they are put in situations which calls for selfless behavior. One phenomena that refutes the claim that most of the population strives for selfless behavior is known as the bystander effect. The bystander effect is when a person feels less responsible for doing selfless acts when they are in an environment of a group of
Altruistic acts are often seen through the benevolent acts of family members express towards each other on a regular basis. Because of the significant amount of genes we share with our kin, the survival of a family is prioritized equally to the survival of the individual. Each member of the family will therefore behave altruistically towards each other, due to the evolutionary drive for survival. The reason that parents behave this altruistically towards their offspring is because “parents (adults) are in a maximally favorable position to dispense inexpensive aid to offspring (eggs) that maximally resembles the parents genetically” (Alexander, 462). Even through altruism is perhaps highest between family members, people also feel more empathetic towards others who possess similar traits, as a large number of genes are share. As altruism “involves a loss of individual fitness, [it] can evolve only by group selection” (Nunney, 228). Therefore, we can see that nature’s force of the survival of the group is a primary driving factor for the appearance of altruism.