Dmc Case

• Net profit margin has been negative and no major patterns over the 9 year period on net profit since the trend of the industry is based mostly on economic factors, and whether or not they secure contracts. Due to high percentage of COGS they are only left with a net profit of $980 or

According to the comprehensive income statements of Blackmores, the figures of net profit margin of the three years

1.Their expected profit for this year before tax( $320 to $355 million) was well below last year ($352 million)

The changes in the above given accounting policies and estimates, affected the reported profits as follows:

the sales for the total market is estimated to be $34 billion. The major custo

recorded totaled $127.7 billion in 2007 and are expected grew 14.3% at $146 billion in 2008. Further,

Although revenues declined in 1999, net income increased by 13% over the prior year. As the graph below illustrates, net income has been volatile in the latter half of the 90 's. Sharp decreases in 1998 and 1999 net income were due to restructuring charges. If these charges had not been incurred, income would have been flat for both years. Efficiency in cost control and inventory management has allowed net income to increase while revenues decreased in 1999. Note that the largest growth rate was 43% in 1997 over the prior year with net income of $795.8 million.

After seeing, the net profit margins go down this lead me to look at the gross profit margin. This tells a different story than net profit margin did. Gross profit margin stays steady throughout the time reviewed. However, we also see that the highest gross profit margin was actually in 2015, that same year had the lowest net profit margin. I found this very interesting; it tells us that the gross profit was good while the net income was not.

They experienced a substantial growth in 2013. They had the gross profit margin of 25.35 percent in 2012 and 26.66 percent in 2013, which is a 5.2 percent increases. (Gamble, Peteraf, & Thompson, 2015, p. 368, Exhibit 1). They expected additional growth to the company in over the year. Thus, they targeted to achieve $50 billion sales by 2018 fiscal year and 12 percent profit margins by 2015 fiscal year. (Gamble, Peteraf, & Thompson, 2015, p. 371). However, the increases in profit were not last forever. They had the gross profit margin of 24.83 percent in 2014, which was the declines of 6.87 percent compared to the previous year. (Gamble, Peteraf, & Thompson, 2015, p. 368, Exhibit 1). According to Cancino (2015), “We could be facing the largest single-year scale decline in the company’s history with income at barely half of its 2013 peak” (as cited in Chicago

The Group posted a net income of P10.14 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to P13.59 million in 2009. The decrease can be attributed to lower restaurant sales and higher operating expenses incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2010.

In 2010 with the net income of $459 million, excluding special items it achieved 285% profit increase from the last year, $600 million bank line of credit and 40% debt to total capital.[2]

* What changes of demand is expected to be seen over the next few years?

loss? Is the rate of return on net assets increasing? What were cash inflows and outflows? Is the

All these were resulted them to have millions of Riggit losses weekly. (Business Plan, Our Way Forward, December 2011, page6)

07 | 12/31/2008 | 12/31/2009 | Revenue | - | 74,250,000 | 50,490,000 | 28,215,000 | 23,760,000 | 23,760,000 | 23,760,000 | | | | | | | | | 2) | Year 2004 | Year 2005 and onwards | | | | | Cost of Goods sold | 60% | 54% | | | | | | Operating Expenses | 24% | 26% | | | | | | | | | | | | | |