Disputes Over the the Design Argument and The Theory of Evolution

In his discussion of the argument from design, which he links with teleological principles, the author refers to the concept of design in a way that alludes to the conviction that there are certain divine manifestations in the world that are so perfect that they must revolve around a grand architect who conceived them to be that way. Therefore, he says that proving such an argument requires "indisputable examples of design or purpose" (McCloskey, 1968, p. 64). However, this standard of indisputability that McCloskey is holding this argument to,

Charles Darwin proposed the theory of evolution to explain the origin, diversity and complexity of life. I will will disprove evolution by showing that natural selection only explains small evolutionary changes, collectively known as microevolution. Natural selection cannot drive large evolutionary changes, macroevolution. I will also show that the primordial soup, in which life supposedly evolved, did not exist.

​The design argument for the existence of God is a type of inductive argument that states there exists an implicit and explicit design or purpose of the universe that points to a single designer, of whom many believe to be an omnibenevolent, omniscient, omnipotent, God. Theists in support of the design argument believe that there is such a small chance that the world could be aligned so perfectly for the universe to exist without the existence of an intelligent designer. Analogy is one form of the design argument that states that humans and the natural world are similar to human-designed objects made for specific purposes, and therefore, humans and the natural world must have also been designed by a single creator. There are many who have

For example, inanimate objects such as pencil sharpeners, toaster ovens, and iPhone are intelligently designed; however, the object is not intelligent itself. The fine tuning argument is the strongest teleological argument; ergo, matter is so finely tuned for life possessing the innate capacity to appear on this planet. According to Dr. James Hannam, “atheists have yet to refute the Fine Tuning argument to Design, and therefore we have reason to believe there was a divine creator”

The debate over Evolutionary theories and Creationism beliefs has been a major debate throughout our churches, education system, and even our homes. There have been countless scientists, theologians, journalists and Christians that have studied both sides of the spectrum, that argue how the world we live in was created. Many empty statements, with little to no facts, just assertions about this particular question have been stated in many debates all over the world. So on one side we have Creationism belief that essentially argues that God is the “intelligent designer” and on the other side Evolutionary theories that state the world has evolved over the centuries. In the Merriam- Webster dictionary, Creationism is defined as, “a doctrine or theory holding that matter, the various forms of life, and the world were created by God out of nothing and usually in the way described in Genesis “. Merriam- Webster dictionary also defines Evolution as, “a theory that the differences between modern plants and animals are because of changes that happened by a natural process over a very long time; the process by which changes in plants and animals happen over time; a process of slow change and development”. So is it possible to believe both of those definitions?

The fine-tuning design argument is one the seven olden and present day forms of a design argument. An example of this the world if few items or belongings of the earth change in some small way it can change the way of life here. If everything remains the same, then we can view life as fine-tuned. Fine-tuned has two accounts for its views. One is the chance and the creative , for someone to make the universe the why it is then and now and how life is friendly. It’s the fact that they argument of design happens by incidental, help gives people think it wasn’t planned or forced. Why is the fine-tuning design argument in a much stronger position than the biological design arguments? First we have to know the biological design arguments before

There are two basic theories in this debate. The first is the historical default, the creation model of origins. This theory maintains that the intricate design infiltrates all things, which implies a designer. The second theory is the more recent, atheistic explanation, the evolution model of origins. This theory suggests that the intricate design infiltrates all things and is a product of random chance and excessive time.

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Teleological Argument Also known as the argument from design, the teleological argument simply states that a designer must exist considering that life in the universe can only occur when it meets the right conditions of “certain fundamental physical constants that are within a very narrow range”, according to InspiringPhilosophy. They also exhibit marks of pattern, consistency, unity and order in their design. In the Watchmaker Argument by William Paley, he stated that human artifacts are products of intelligent design. The universe looks like human artifacts.

Intelligent Design is the idea that living creatures on Earth are so complex that, they could not possibly have been created through the natural selection. It is the belief that there must be an ?intelligent designer? that created us all. This creator is usually referenced as God. However, it may also be

The argument of design isn’t about the question of God’s existence but about the answer to the nature of God. The Design argument, also known as “a posteriori”, is to prove the existence of God who has the characteristics of being all- powerful, all- knowing and benevolent.The intelligent design is about observations and coming to conclusions which try to prove the natural world is created by an intelligent being. An analogy was presented between human artifacts and nature to determine that the creator of this natural world must be intelligent.

Throughout the history of mankind nearly all populations of humanity have come to the conclusion that an intelligent being of some sort had a role in the creation of life. Why has nearly every civilization developed a belief that someone or something shaped our world and actively plays a part in our lives? Through science we have discovered the reasons for many of our worldly problems and no longer attribute terrible misfortunes such as disease or drought to the punishments of the gods as earlier humans had done. Recent scientific discoveries since the introduction of The Theory of Evolution by Charles Darwin have caused arguments over whether intelligent design is wrong or if intelligent design even have a objective place in science. Modern scientists who adhere to a purely evolutionary viewpoint of life will claim that earlier humans did not have the benefit of current evidence for evolution and God therefore was the only explanation our ancestors could comprehend. Investigation into the microscopic interworking’s of living cells by researchers such as Michael Behe present many ideas that attempt to prove God through intelligent design. The film Unlocking the Mysteries of Life attempts to present evidence for intelligent design through the specialized structure and actions of cells. Proof for intelligent design is not revealed due to failure to present evidence of irreducible complexity, invoking intelligent design to explain scientific mysteries and misrepresenting the

The first version of the Design argument came from Plato, a Greek philosopher, who developed it to address the universe's apparent order. Plato proposed in his book Timaeus that a “demiurge”, a divine being of supreme wisdom and intelligence, was the creator of the

The Design Argument was created by William Paley. He uses and Analogy known as the watch analogy. Imagine you are in a field and you find a watch. You have never seen a watch before. You ask who made it and see how complicated it is. Your friends say ‘nobody’, it appeared by chance’. You think your friend is crazy. Someone had to design the watch for the purpose of telling time. You conclude that the design of the watch is too complex to not have a creator. If there is a design for technology, why is there not a design for nature? Paley calls nature’s designer God. Some people agree with this argument because when they look around they see evidence supporting this argument and it is easier to understand than some of the other arguments. Others think that Nature evolved to be complex .the survival of the best in nature means the animals that can adapt live and those that cannot become extinct. Why would God design something that would become extinct? Also I god designed everything, then why is there so much in nature that is cruel? Why didn’t he eliminate diseases, deformities and

The problem is one of choosing the correct analogy. He pointed out that the universe more resembles a living organism than a mechanical watch -- which indicates that the universe must have started as a fetus in a cosmic womb! Other scholars also lampooned Paley's argument; Voltaire argued that noses must have been designed to hold up glasses, and that bunny rabbits must have been given white tails so they could be easier to shoot. The idea of design was so thoroughly and effectively ridiculed that theologians of the time actually stopped using it as an argument, although, curiously enough, it would resurface in the 20th century.

There are three major refutations against the design argument, first she designs argument is faulted for its weak analogy between the natural objects and the objects that that is known to have a creator such as buildings. This is the equivalent of comparing apples to oranges. For the second refutation the design argument claims that everything has a perfect design, this simply isn’t the case. For example, we can examine the issues of starvation within the United States, although the world is structured to perfectly provide food for humans, there still people starving because of imperfect circumstances such as the inability to transport food to those who can`t receive it themselves (Tombs 7). The strongest and most accepted argument against the design argument is the theory of evolution and adaptation. Those who support the theory of evolution and adaptation credits the perfect design of the aspects to those two concepts. Artic Fish are an example of this adaption, they have developed a protein in their blood that prevent their blood from freezing which allows them continue their metabolic functions (Lloyd 2). The finally argument against the design theory states that even if the premise of the argument is true, its doesn’t necessarily confirm the existence of God.