preview

Discrimination And Discrimination

Good Essays

America’s prison incarceration rate has increased by over 600%. This outlandish statistic leaves America with the largest incarceration rate in the world. (Pager 2003) As of right now, one-third of the population has a criminal record of some sort (Barraza 2016). The issue of incarceration doesn’t stop with alarming numbers, however. A damaging amount of stigma is attached to those that have a criminal record. Having a record essentially becomes an automatic stamp of dismissal from American society; you are barred from, or severely limited in your ability to, gain meaningful employment, pay for higher education, or, in some cases, be banned from housing altogether. In 2016, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced that they would now be expanding the protections of the Fair Housing Act to restrict the blanket denial of housing to those with criminal records (2016). To better understand the content of this newer policy, the social conditions that made it necessary, and the impact it can have on inequality, having an understanding of sociological concepts such as approaches to community-based discrimination, de facto segregation, steering practices, total discrimination, and the benefits of integration is essential. The Fair Housing Act of 1968 was passed to prevent the same discrimination we seem to be suffocating in today. The purpose of the act was to make it unlawful to deny access to housing based on the “race, color, religion, or national origin” (Yinger 1999). Later, the act would be amended to included “protected parties” such as disabled people, for example. Almost 50 years after the original act was signed into law, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is making a change to expand, or at least specifically acknowledge and included, those that have a criminal record. The press release made by a department representative explicitly states, “Under this standard, a facially-neutral policy or practice that has a discriminatory effect violates the Act if it is not supported by a legally sufficient justification. Thus, where a policy or practice that restricts access to housing on the basis of criminal history has a disparate impact on individuals of a particular race,

Get Access