preview

Disadvantages Of Reduction In Force

Decent Essays

A reduce in force of full-time staff members, not only affects over 500 faculty members, but also the quality of life and education for students that attend St. Louis Community College(STLCC). Chancellor Dr. Jeff Pittman has concluded that a reduction in force seems necessary since the Missouri Governor, Eric Greitens, cut $3.58 million in STLCC’s budget(Jost). The disadvantages of cutting full-time staff members, outweigh the few advantages. Has Missouri’s governor and chancellor fought hard against these budget cuts? State Representative Scott Fitzpatrick says, “I mean, it's a difficult decision, but [Greitens] probably made the right one,”(Rosenbaum). Probably? This decision is not a small change, this decision will affect hundreds, if not thousands of people. It should not be a dubious decision. The phrase “reduction in force” is simple and takes away the humanity of STLCC staff members. A RIF does not just affect the number of (full-time) staff members on campus, it affects real lives. These people have families and other needs that they need to …show more content…

If full-time staff members are forcibly turned into part-time staff members, money could be tight for them. Hence, seeking another source of income/job. No longer putting in 100% of their efforts into the one job that they held before. That is not to say that part-time staff members don’t put in a great effort. In fact, my father used to teach at Webster University as well as being a high school teacher at Ladue High School. He was putting in long hours, and at times I could tell he was putting in a little more effort towards the high school students. Thus affecting the quality of education that other students did not receive. In the end, what is in the student's’ best interest? The quality of education that students receive heavily lays on the jobs of such staff members. If these staff members are cut to contingent employees, it would not only impact

Get Access