Reliability And Validity Of Interviews Essay

I am now going to look at five types of interview and approaches that can be taken for different reasons;

Alyssa is showing concern about who will view her record. The case manager explains that she knows privacy is important to Alyssa. The supervisor, consultant, and other staff who are working directly with Alyssa cannot view her record without her signed consent. In explaining to the client there are exceptions in cases of emergency where information may be shared without her consent. For example, suicide, homicide or other life-threatening situations (Woodside & McClam, 2013).

*For the purpose of this assignment and to keep the privacy of participates, the interviewee will be addressed as such, or as Person A.

In these agencies visits the skill that was mainly used and develop was interviewing. Interviewing is defines as a formal meeting between one or more individuals where questions are being asked and answers are being given. The type of interview that was conducted was face to face consultation. This is one of the best types of interview because it gives you an opportunity to observe the surroundings and body language of the interviewee.

Motivational Interviewing (MI) refers to a client centred counselling approach, which is directed to enhance motivation in an individual for behaviour change Miller & Rollnick (as cited in Christopher & Dougher, 2009). MI as a method understands and accepts that the clients are at different levels of readiness to change their behavior. It consistently focuses on goals to prepare the client for transformation by providing motivation for commitment to change (Bricker & Tollison, 2011) in the domains of substance abuse, addiction and risky health problems. It proceeds to make the client aware of the causes, consequences and risks that could be a result of the behavior. Through this, the client foresees the possibilities of enhancement and becomes motivated to achieve it (Jenson, Cushing, Aylward, Craig, Sorell & Steel, 2011). MI is coherent with the

One method of research is using interviews. For example, when using interviews in a care home, when conducting research, many ethical issues can be raised. Interviews not only take place face-to-face, but also can happen on the phone, online, through text messaging, using a video messenger and though social media. Interviews are a very useful way of collecting information because a wide range of detailed information can be collected at a large quantity. There are two types of interviews: structured or unstructured.

We are going to look at the use of interviewing techniques by those who investigate. As a result of interviews conducted after accidents and criminal offenses, the interviewer must be able to analyze witness statements in order to translate witness observations into facts and create logic from confusion. The interviewer must have an understanding of those factors that affect witness reporting. The gathering of witness information comprises about 50 percent of the investigating technique, the remaining 50 percent hinges on the ability of the interviewer to analyze and apply his or her knowledge to the sometimes

Whereas a structured interview follows a standardised format, in an unstructured interview the interviewer has complete freedom to vary the interview. Supporters argue that this brings a number of important advantages. Such as, rapport and sensitivity, the interviewee's views are clearer, the ability to check understanding, flexibility and the ability for the interviewer to explore unfamiliar topics. However, there are multiple disadvantages to using unstructured interviews in sociological research. Such as, practical problems, which include, time and sample size, training, and interpersonal skills, there are also issues with representativeness, reliability, quantification and validity.

Therefore, validating the data as dependable, trustworthy, unfailing, sure, authentic, genuine and reputable as proven results in any research study (Smith 2003). In the event, credibility, the key feature is to establish the research results as true to being credible or believable to the research literature evaluations (Smith 2003). In addition to these ethics of evaluating research literature, here are five principles within the research study by Smith 2003; (1) be conscious of multiple roles; (2) avoiding roles which distort your judgment and harm to others (Smith 2003), (3) remember to adhere to the informed consent rules; avoiding risk adhered to respecting the confidentiality and privacy of all individuals involved (Smith

Scientific merit is considered as a way to examine if our research study represents good science. Therefore, we will need to make sure that any research we are working on, clearly states the research questions and its overall objectives. The research should also include the contextual data that will also have peer-reviewed literature to support why the research is needed. We also should make sure that if human beings are being used as participants, that their privacy and safety will be respected, and if there is any possibility of harm, no matter how small it is, and the benefit and risks whether indirect or direct for the partakers in the study needs to be very clear in the research proposal. According to Gonzales (2013, para. 2, p. 1), the data collection, recruitment, and analysis should align with the research questions, as well as the monitoring, safe storage, and how the data will be destroyed should also be specified.

You can establish credibility with your audience before and during your presentation by showing that you care. You can do this by showing that you value their time and opinion. You can also build credibility during your presentations by using research from well-known sources. Lastly, you can build your credibility after your presentation by making sure the information in your presentation is useful and accurate allowing it to be used at a later date.

There are several threats to internal validity related to participants based on lack of information about the individuals selected for the study.

How frequently do you handle appeals? I check senior UHC appeals multiple times a day and general senior staff appeals at least once a day, unless I’m on LOA.

A thematic analysis of an interview was used to help students develop an understanding of the role of an RC. This role is dynamic and challenging; it offers great opportunities to grow and work in an academic team based environment that fosters constant learning. Often RCs play a significant role in the process of bringing a project from conception to completion which requires a variety of qualifications and leadership qualities. An inductive approach to this process, beginning with data collection and analysis, allowed me to consider specific aspects of the topic and progress on to more general concepts. Eventually, I was able to discover connections between existing knowledge and the data I analyzed. The finalized themes included Qualifications; Role of Team Leader; Rewards and Challenges.

The valid information is mostly expected from the grounds of what are the changes in behaviour and how much responses are ethical. In this regard, the most of the responses are valid from focus group analysis, lab research and questionnaire as well as interview studies.