preview

Differences Between International Law And Human Rights Law

Decent Essays

Both international law and human rights law work towards establishing some grounding to maintain a sense of peace within and between nations. However, they also have differences between them such as what their regulations apply to, and how they are applied. The main differences between international law and human rights law is that one is intended to govern the relations between independent states, whereas human rights law are intended to maintain the standards without which people cannot live with respect to themselves. As written by scholar Celina Romany in her text called “Women as Aliens: A Feminist Critique of the Public/Private Distinction in International Human Rights Law,” neither international law nor human rights law are likely to recognize, secure or actualize human rights for all humans. In her text, she particularly addresses women and how they are the “paradigmatic alien subjects of international law”. This statement can be reinforced by various aspects of systemic inequalities that women face, thus proving the insufficiency of human rights law in recognizing, securing and actualizing all human rights for all. Both international law and human rights law are subject to similar organizations and actors such as states, international organizations, multinational corporations, and more. The sources of the laws formed by both are also similar for they include but are not limited to treaties, conventions, and principles. Human rights laws have been defined by the

Get Access