In department 47 there were many trails going on. The judge was calling by the numbers in the line and each trail has a lawyer who represent his plaintiff or defendant. One of these trail was Pascal Anton Case Number C1638971 the, she was not present for her trail for that the Judge jumped it. The another case was Number 12 but I am not sure about the Name, but we saw the judge asking the defendant to stay away from that woman or he is going to sentenced him for three years. What we observed in department 47, there were no Juries we were surprised because it's kind of different from what we thought. The judge calling by Numbers and there are only lawyers of defendants or plaintiff.
These guidelines and procedures help to “provide for orderly conduct of legal processes and ensure the rights of the litigants. (Schuetz; pg. 37)”. In the case of Reilly Winter versus TBT Innovative trial, held in court on Saturday, February 11, 2017. The court engages the service of the jury to decide on the case and the court is presided over by judges, even though it is a civil case. This is provided by the seventh amendment, which allows the use of juries in civil cases but does not mandate it.
The Honorable Glenn Thompson, Circuit Court Judge instructed the attorneys and defendants to be alert as the docket was long and there was a need to avoid delay due to individuals being out of the courtroom when their name was called. The defendants were called alphabetically to receive their sentencing.
As deputy manager it is within my job role to conduct monthly supervisions which then lead into an annual appraisal. At this time I currently have three supervisees.
My understanding of the court system has changed almost weekly from the beginning of my semester. I do understand things that I never thought I would’ve have known or even cared about in the least. The book Courtroom 302 has brought an even different side of thinking into this. The book goes into detail about the criminal court in Chicago. He watches all of the actions and different trials that come and go in the courtroom 302. He presents many different cases throughout the book which gives more insight then just a single case.
The book Courtroom 302, written by Steve Bogira in 2005, is about the criminal courts in Chicago, IL. Steve Bogira graduated from Northwestern University, and is an excellent reporter for the Chicago Review. Courtroom 302 is story told mainly from through Steve Bogira’s observations. Bogira observes a courtroom (Courtroom 302), and basically the entire justice system process from beginning to end. The courtroom that Bogira observes is in the control of Judge Daniel Locallo. Judge Locallo helps give Bogira an all access view, plus vital personal thoughts and feelings about issues and events that he has dealt with; and Bogira has observed. Judge Locallo is not the only person that expresses personal information. Many employees of the
There are many things which can affect access to complementary therapies. The ones I will be explaining are:
In this section I am going to evaluate the effectiveness of Lay people within the English Legal System.
Describe possible multiple conditions and/or disabilities that individuals may have. Individuals may have multiple disabilities/conditions such as mental health issues, physical problems, learning difficulties and sensory loss. Extra support may be required for individuals that may have these multiple disabilities.
Importance of teamwork is that when a team works well together they tend to understand their team members strengths and weaknesses. Strong teamwork can benefit from the team members and I say this because they become more capable at splitting up tasks so that they are accomplished by the members of the team that are more highly qualified. If businesses didn’t have strong teamwork within their business, it could make everything a lot harder for managers of the business to settle certain staff members, whom can fulfil tasks at their incomparable standard.
Tesco has a good progress and their strategy is made up of of five elements:
The criminal trial process is an interesting process that takes place in Courtrooms all across the United States and throughout the globe. This study intends to set out the various steps in the criminal trial process in the American justice system. A trial is described as a "legal forum for resolving individual disputes, and in the case of a criminal charge, it is a means for establishing whether an accused person is legally guilty of an offense. The trial process varies with respect to whether the matter at issue is civil in nature or criminal. In either case, a jury acts as a fact-finding body for the court in assessing information and evidence that is presented by the respective parties in a case. A judge presides over the court and addresses all the legal issues that arise during the trial. A judge also instructs the jury how to apply the facts to the laws that will govern in a given case." (3rd Judicial District, 2012)
Safeguarding means to ‘safeguard’ an individual, to promote and prompt the safety of a vulnerable child or adult. Ensuring you have appropriate measures in place to maximise the safeguarding of others. Safeguarding is everyone’s responsibility that comes into contact with a vulnerable person and it is their responsibility to raise an alert immediately should anything be ‘out of the ordinary’
because of dementia etc.) so as carers we must be aware of medications they are on and look for possible side effects that could be effecting them.
During this documentary, the viewers get an inside look at how criminal proceedings work. In the courtroom, the most important players are the prosecution, defense, and judge. The judge is in the room to make sure the proceeding runs smoothly and to settle any arguments that arise. The prosecution is there to accuse the defendant for whatever crime he or she has been convicted of. The defense is there to defend the person being convicted of the crime. There is also a bailiff who is there to oversee the court and make sure everyone there is safe. The bailiff will bring evidence form the defense or prosecution to the judge, as nobody is to approach the bench without the judge calling attorneys to the