preview

Deontology and Homosexuality Essay

Decent Essays

If a faculty advisor censors an article written by a gay student, they are following their traditional viewpoints against the homosexual lifestyle. Several researchers have addressed the issue of sexual preferences and consequential discriminative beliefs. According to research by Herek (1987), religion is one of the most important social agents in defining viewpoints against homosexuality, and their intolerance reflects on both the academic community and the entire society. As a moral realist, I cannot form prejudices because the main rule of moral realism states that the objective truth is not related to subjective beliefs. The perlocutionary analysis will be used in evaluating and responding to the issue because my goal is to …show more content…

The Roman Catholic Church did not accept the gay lifestyle at the time when the article had to be published, so it was expected that they will censor it. According to the divine theory, God sets the rules people follow and his rules are absolute in all circumstances (Wierenga, 1983). While the Church argues for God's perfection, I would argue that the rules they follow are their own, and I would point out the contradiction in their own rules. In the case of homosexuality, the Church states that they are against homosexuality. On the other hand, the Church promotes love and compassion for all living beings (Herek, 1987). Homosexuals are living beings, so it is not possible to promote love for living beings and prejudice against homosexuals at the same time, and the argument imposed by the Church displays a deductive fallacy. If God is the creator of the world and loves all of his children, it is not possible to state that God is against the gay lifestyle and gay people. In conclusion, despite the differences in sexual orientation, God equally loves all people.

According to moral realism, statements can be true or false, and its status is defined by objective factors that are unrelated to subjective beliefs and opinions. If I am a moral realist, I cannot accept discrimination based on subjective viewpoints against other people. In that case, the letter would display statements such as, “It is unethical to separate

Get Access