Deontology

Overall, deontology is based upon not just by following universal rules or performing what is ought to do, but by respecting human beings as rational beings as well. Deontology judges the ethical motive of an action not by its consequences, merely by the reasoning behind it.

Another theoretical framework noted in the documentary was deontology. Deontology is a duty or obligation, but can clash with moral ideas.

Deontology or also know as Deontology ethics is an approach that is taken that determines the goodness and rightness of a specific act or rules and duties that a specific person has to perform. Deontology is the complete opposite of consequentialism. Consequentialism is the where the outcome of an act has a major influence and not the actual act itself. In better words it is what comes after the action that is made and not the action itself. As for deontology an action can be considered right or something acceptable even if the outcome of the action is something bad. A perfect example for deontology would be “ do onto others what you would have them do onto you.” This is just something that

Deontology is an ethical position that examines the morality of an action based on the action’s adherence to rule or rules. Many times is described as obligation or rule based ethics (Alexander). Therefore, the only actions that are considered moral are those that are performed solely for one’s duty to the moral law rather than one’s desire. Deontology is the school of thought that Kant comes from. Immanuel Kant was a critical figure in philosophy in the modern age. His work was the foundation of the most famous form of Deontology.

Deontological ethics is sometimes called duty-based ethics, which is a branch of ethics that believes people's actions should be based on rules about right and wrong. People who subscribe to deontological ethics believe that actions should be taken or not taken based on these rules about right and wrong (Mohn, E. 2016). A Deontologist looks at the reason that the act is done rather than looking at the consequences (Mossser, 2013).

Deontology is an ethical theory concerned with duties and rights. The founder of deontological ethics was a German philosopher named Immanuel Kant. Kant’s deontological perspective implies people are sensitive to moral duties that require or prohibit certain behaviors, irrespective of the consequences (Tanner, Medin, & Iliev, 2008). The main focus of deontology is duty: deontology is derived from the Greek word deon, meaning duty. A duty is morally mandated action, for instance, the duty never to lie and always to keep your word. Based on Kant, even when individuals do not want to act on duty they are ethically obligated to do so (Rich, 2008).

Deontology is the study of the nature of duty and obligation. It comes from the Greek word “deon” that means duty. Deontology ethics is the views of moral that make decisions. It is the ethics that focuses whether actions are right or wrong themselves, but not the right or wrong of the consequences of those actions. An example of deontology is the action of killing someone, even if it was in self-defense, is wrong by moral standard.

Deontology or duty is “if a cultural norm of law conflicts with a moral duty, then the moral duty should take precedence over the legal duty” (Boss). So with Boss’s example of the doctor in a bit of a dilemma, he must make a decision between telling the wife the real situation of her husband's real condition and keep a marriage from falling apart. Or in terms of Deontology, the doctor must choose between going against cultural norms. But lawfully speaking, the doctor doesn't have the right to tell the wife about her husband’s health condition. So in that way she is choosing her moral duty over the lawful conditions of her profession. My beliefs on this is split. I do believe that the doctor must follow protocol and not inform the wife because her profession says so but I also believe that the wife deserves to know that status of her marriage. So either side of this Deontology argument can be made in my opinion. But the side of the argument that has the doctor informing the wife of the situation is the Absolute Duty. This is “one that is always morally binding regardless of the circumstances” (Boss). The argument that is the doctor following the law is the Prima Facie Duty. Morally binding till it conflicts with moral obligations.

Deontology can be defined as “moral theories that guide and assess our choices of what we ought to do, in contrast to other theories that guide and assess what kind of person we are should be (Alexander & Moore, 2007). Consequentialism “argues that the morality of an action is based on the action’s outcome or consequence, the action’s outcome or consequence, a morally right action is one that produces a good outcome or result, and the consequences of an action or rule generally outweigh all other considerations” (Anonymous, n.d.). These two theories differ in various ways. While deontology focuses in the rightness and wrongness of one’s intent to conform to duty or laws, consequentialism emphasizes on the potential outcomes and

Deontology come from the Greek word for duty. Deontology is the belief that good outcomes are largely irrelevant to moral concerns. Deontology takes away the effects of our actions and places the focus on the actions themselves. Actions that are prohibited in deontology include lying, killing, and dishonesty (Williams and Arrigo, 2012). In our example, Slager was responsible for the death of another, lied about how the incident occurred, and was overall dishonest.

As chief nephrologist of the legal and ethical hospital, it has come to my attention that our kidney dialysis appointments have a limited availability. A shortage in a key component has made it impossible to acquire more equipment in the immediate future. As of 9/5/2015, there will be a new methodology in place to ensure we are able to provide the greatest amount of good possible for as many patients. Nurses and receptionists will need to inform any patients attempting to schedule an appointment of the new procedures and professionally explain how a shortage of supplies has limited area hospitals.

Philosophybasics.com - Deontology, also known as “duty-bound” ethics, mainly focuses on the rightness or wrongness of an action, as opposed to the rightness or wrongness of the consequence of the action. In short, Deontology teaches that any act is ethical as long as it adheres to the moral

The primary difference between deontology and utilitarianism, two competing systems of ethics, is that the former system is concerned with whether an act is intrinsically right or wrong, while the latter system believes that only the consequences of an act are important. Deontology deals with intentions and motives. Utilitarianism focuses only on results. ("What Is The Difference Between Deontology And Utilitarianism?")

Proponents of deontological ethics do not consider consequences as important when determining whether an individual is moral or immoral. Morality is based solely on the person’s action. Several ethical theories are deontological theories.

The word deontology is derived from the Greek words deon, meaning duty or obligation, and logos, meaning science or study. This school of ethics looks at the acts we attempt to do, and holds that right becomes before good. This means that if an act is not right, it may not be undertaken, no matter how much good it produces; an act is judged not on its consequences but whether or not it follows from one’s duty. Deontology recognizes two different types of imperatives; hypothetical and categorical. The categorical imperative is the deontological way of doing ethics. An example of an hypothetical imperative is “if I want to have white teeth, then I should brush my teeth”, and example of a categorical imperative is “I should brush my teeth”. According to Kant one should act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law without contradiction. This means that when you want to steal something you should think about it as a universal law, and thereby give other people the right to steal from you. However, if stealing would be an universal law then private property would be impossible and you would be unable to steal. This is a contradiction, and the general rule in deontology therefore is that stealing is morally