Delisting the Grey Wolf
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service are considering removing the gray wolf from the endangered species list once Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming have enough wolves to be deemed sufficient to continue to expand the wolf population, requiring only that each of these three states have a management plan in effect to prevent the gray wolf from becoming endangered again. With the current attitude of the governments in these states, the wolf should not lose their federal support under the Endangered Species Act as it would merely serve to cause the wolves to become endangered once again, or at best, held to the absolute minimum population that the states can pass off as “viable, self-sustaining populations”
…show more content…
The state legislature has favored the ranching industry above ecology and continues to do so. Public polls “conducted by Boise State indicate that the overwhelming majority of Idahoans (nearly 70 percent) support wolf restoration” (Laverty, par. 4) and the legislature is seeking to remedy this by re-educating the public with “a balanced view of the impact of wolves on big game species, those sectors of the economy dependent upon sport hunting, livestock, domestic animals, and humans” (State, 3). Furthermore, the “cost of wolf reintroduction will be presented as a part of any public education program including direct and indirect costs” (State, 3).
This so-called balanced view was presented in a program in which the “most misrepresented issues concerned the economic impact of wolves. Ranchers were allowed to claim unsubstantiated losses, with no attempt to validate the accuracy of these claims” (Laverty, par. 2). In granting the balanced view sought by the legislature, the “program portrayed the salt of the earth rancher as a poor victim of the federal government’s whim to restore the ‘killers’” (Laverty, par. 2).
The lies by omission also showed up in this balanced view program, it “failed to expose the enormous subsidies that benefit
With the reintroduction of the Grey Wolf into the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem there have been many people who are opposed. Mainly the ranchers in Montana
We looked first at the relationship between the wolf population and the moose population. From about 1960 to 1970, the wolf population remained fairly consistent at about 20 to 25 wolves. During this time, the moose population grew steadily from 500 to over 1200. The next 10 years saw a doubling of the wolf population to 50. This same 10 years saw a decrease of the moose population from over 1200 to over 800. Then in 1980 began a two year drastic decline in the moose population, which was brought down to 15. For the rest of the decade, the moose population remained quite low at numbers near 20. During the 1980s, the moose population doubled again from around 800 to
These two somewhat-polarized examples of public opinion relative to wolves should give the reader an understanding of the range of wolf-related emotions over that 20-year period. Read on to determine other opinions and ideas relative to Canadian wolves and their management and if there has been much change in these
One supporting detail was stated in the video titled, “Isle Royale” it states that “Federal designated land is the place in our country that we are most proud of that humans have not intervened and not having an impact on the land and wilderness.” This means that land that are specifically made to not be intervened with by human need to stay that way. This also means if we mess with the nature there it a tampering making the land not federal preserved. This supports that we should allow nature on Isle Royale to take its course and not intervene with the population of wolves.
The article, Washington wolf killing sparks rebukes, controversy discusses the local issue in Spokane Washington. Cattle ranchers have experienced a problem with the Profanity Peak wolf pack. The wolves attacked the rancher’s cattle as they grazed. It was reported that 6 cows were killed. In response, hunters grouped together and killed 6 wolves. This hunting riddled many environmental groups. They say that the wolves should not be slaughtered simply for living out their natural ways. In recent reports, Washington State University disapproved a professor, Robert Wielgus, who released inaccurate information regarding cattle rancher’s actions that rallied people against the ranchers. The misguided information resulted in death threats towards
There are approximately 50 Red Wolves left in the wild today! Out of the 250 Red Wolves that are known to exist only 50 are roaming in the wild. The rest are in zoos or animal centers being repopulated. In the 1960s, there were plenty of these Wolves. Until, us humans caused their habitat loss, and predator control programs. They were considered endangered in 1973 and efforts started to be made to protect these creatures since then. The Red Wolf Protection Act should be passed to protect their environment, to repopulate them, and to bring them back into the wild.
Over the past several years, the gray wolf, native to the Wisconsin area, has been listed federally as an endangered species due to the graphic and horrific treatment they had received during the industrialization periods of America, when they were frowned upon and hated because they are predatory creatures and did, on occasion, attack livestock and pets. Because the government was encouraging the hunting, including bounties for the animals, the wolves were hunted to near extinction. However, now Wisconsin faces a new problem. With the reintroduction of the wolves to the state, and their continued endangered status federally, the population has increased well beyond expectations, reaching what could be considered a problematic state. A
While researching the gray wolf, I found out that it is actually a very touchy subject in Michigan. The hunting of Gray Wolves has been a very controversial topic. Gray wolves are native to Michigan but were nearly wiped out in the 19th and early 20th centuries by hunting and state-sanctioned bounties. In 1973, when Congress created the federal endangered species list, only six wolves were known to still exist in the Michigan wild, and gray wolves were considered an endangered species. By 2007, the wolf population in the Upper Peninsula topped 500 -- far exceeding the recovery benchmark of 100 set by the federal government, making the Great Lakes gray wolf one of the most successful recovery stories in the history of the endangered species list. The gray wolf actually came off the endangered species list in 2012, but as of December 2014, has been relisted.
These were all key factors to their near extinction. In 1974 the wolves were placed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), but were not protected for long. Many environmentalist agreed with this act because environmentalist knew how crucial this keystone specie was to the ecosystem. Without the grey wolves existence, the whole rest of the ecosystem would not function properly. Unfortunately, around the 1960s, the gray wolf population was basically extinct, which resulted in a huge controversy. Luckily, “In 1995, the first 14 wolves were introduced to the Yellowstone National Park to increase the wolf population”(Transplanted) that had been decreasing gradually. Over the years more Canadian wolves were introduced to the Yellowstone National park to increase the wolf population. This procedure was successful because the wolf population throughout the Yellowstone region was on the rise. The long term goal for the environmentalists and Yellowstone park rangers would be to have around 1,000 wolves roaming the region.
The red wolf is listed as endangered under the U. S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) (United States Public Law No. 93-205; United States Code Title 16 Section 1531 et seq.). Wild red wolves inhabiting the north eastern North Carolina (NENC), USA recovery area and a single island propagation site (St. Vincent NWR, Florida) are designated as experimental non-essential populations under Section 10(j) of the ESA. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species lists the red wolf’s status as critically endangered.
One of the only animals you can find North Carolina is the red wolf. According to Christopher Ketcham, only 47 red wolves are left in North Carolina wild (Ketcham, 2016). Protecting this species is going to take a lot of effort because it’s already at the edge of extinction. Some people might not want to due to the fact of money must be involved. The safety of the animal and its habitat is going to take tremendous money to keep up with the cost of providing what is needed. Although the cost is outstanding and unimaginable, the end result will be worth more than what was put into saving the species. Losing one species may change the food chain which can cause a disruption in the resources farmers and companies need to make the needs we, humans, want. These reasons won’t convince people to fund the protection of biodiversity loss, but organization has been made to protect and enforce laws to help protect species. One of these organization is called, The United Nations Environment Programm (UNEP). This organization tells the responsibilities of humans, management of forests and other preventions of biodiversity loss (Briefing PapersWorldConferences, n.d.). Another simple and most common reason to save the species and every other species is, simply put, “the fact we have a place that’s globally significant for biodiversity right here in North
After Leopold shot the wolf, he and his friend reached the old wolf in time to watch “that fierce green fire die in her eyes” (68). Leopold continues to state, “I realized then, and have known ever since, that there was something new to me in those eyes- something known to only her and the mountain.” After killing the wolf and explaining his theory on how fewer wolves meant more deer and that no wolves would mean hunters’ paradise, Leopold is quick to recognize his cruel error. In paragraph 7, the author says, “Since then I have lived to see state after state expirate its wolves. I have watched the face of many a wolfless mountain, and seen the south-facing slopes wrinkle with a maze of new deer trails. I have seen every edible bush and seedling browsed, first to anaemic desuetude, and then to death” (Leopold 68). After coming to realization of what he had just done, Leopold feels empty, as now there is an important factor in the wildlife missing. The author’s experience reminds me of the way myself and others often take situations and people for granted. I find myself taking advantage of things; whether it be friends, sports, or opportunities, not knowing what I had until it is
The article is about the war between wolves and humans. The war is not a literal war it is more one sided. It is one sided because the humans are really the only ones killing. The humans view wolves as vicious predators, but actually they are just territorial and protective. When a human comes to close to a den, the wolf will warn the human to stay away, but if humans do not listen to the signs, the wolf could attack. In 1974, Canis Lupus were declared endangered, but in the 1980’s wolves started to reappear and then vanish again. To help get wolves back into the U.S, game wardens brought wolves from Canada to release them in Yellowstone National Park. This article talks about the “war” between humans and wolves and how they are misunderstood.
Wolves and humans have an ongoing battle between one another. Hunter vs the hunted, humans are always the hunted and the wolf the hunter, but in an amazing turn of events humans take matters into their own hands and become the hunters, demolishing the danger that hunts them, the wolf. Wolves have been depicted as voracious killers, for as long as I can remember, and we humans are the prey they seek, victims of their sharp teeth and thirst for blood. The media does an extraordinary job in representing the wolf as a killer, deceiver and danger. Wolves however, were a symbol of life in the olden days, around 300 BC. It wasn't until humans began to own farm lands that this battle, and stigma developed. Wolves no longer became a symbol they idolized , but a symbol of terror and gruesome death. As our societies developed, the media became part of our everyday life, resulting in a new image. An image where the wolf, as a species, drastically changed. My visual argument demonstrates three categories: Big Bad Wolf, Ranchers Eye, and Wolf as Lamb. I hope to demonstrate the negative impacts that the media has created for the wolf, as a result, helps reinforces the fears and beliefs we have as a society have of wolves, negative associations that depict the wolf as evil, dangerous, and a threat to our lives.
The gray wolves ingigenous to Oregon were eradicated in the 1940's because they menaced livestock. In 1973 the endangered species act was passed by congress and the grey wolf was desighned an an endangered species. In 1999, Oregon saw it's first wolf pups were born in the state. On November 9, 2015 the state delisted the gray wolf claiming breeding guidelines had been reached.