Unit 9 Defender Direct, Inc.: A Business of Growing Leaders Case Study Analysis Kaplan University School of Business MT460 Management Policy and Strategy Author: Lissete Duran-Pereira Professor: Dr. Andryce Zurick Date: October 3rd, 2016 Name of Case Study Company Name: Defender Direct, Inc.: A Business of Growing Leaders Topic of the Week: Leadership, Policy, and Culture Synopsis of the Situation Defenders Direct Inc. was started by Dave Lindsey as a home business in 1998. Lindsey started the company with the family savings of $30,000 and it has grown ever since. The company was originally known as Defender Security Co. and it became the largest security dealer in the Midwest. As of right now Defenders Direct Inc. has over 1500 employees and 120 offices in about 40 states. …show more content…
Defenders Direct Inc. should be constantly reinventing the company to keep the competitive edge 2. Defenders Direct Inc. should consider sourcing long-term finances like debt. 3. Defenders Direct Inc. should look into expanding into car security systems. Selected Solution to the Problem When looking to expanded, Defenders Direct Inc. should consider something like debt financing. When combining debt financing with a short term sources, the long term debt capital will be cheaper. To increase the diversity productivity and flexibility for the company, Defenders Direct Inc. should invest in more marginal capital expenditure projects. Debt capital is beneficial because the providers of the debt will not try to control the affairs of the company. This will allow the company to grow without having to worry about any interference from the capital providers. Implementation the debt capital that Defenders Direct Inc. needs would be raised by an independent debt capital market. How this markets work is that they identify the new sources of capital and strategic investors. After they associate this investors with the right companies that requires the
Debt capital: borrowing someone else’s money to finance the business under the condition that the money plus accrued interest must be paid back in full by an agreed upon date in the future
Nevertheless, the use of the Optimal Capital Structure (OCS) is the right techniques to be used in order to acquire the right combination of debt and equity that can maximize the
options to obtain the needed capital and how you would approach securing this type of financing.
Finding the perfect capital structure in terms of risk and reward can ensure a company meets shareholder expectations and protects a firm in times of recession. Capital structure refers to how a business puts its money to “work”. The two forms of capital structure are equity capital and debt capital. Both have their benefits and limitations. Striking that perfect balance between the two can mean the difference between thriving versus trying to survive.
Cash dividends on their stock are funneled back into the company to finance growth of the company. What are they doing to achieve this growth? During the last 2 fiscal years they have introduced 46 new handgun models and 13 new long-gun model thanks to the 40 member R&D team (10-K Annual Report p.2, 2011).
A capital structure policy aims to balance the trade-off between the benefits of debt financing (interest tax shield) and the costs of debt financing (financial distress and agency costs). Every firm should set its target capital structure such that its cost and benefits of leverage ultimately maximise the firm’s value. Graham and Harvey asked 392 firms’ chief financial officers whether they use target debt ratios. Results show that the majority of them do, although the level of strictness of the target policy varies across different companies. Only 19% of the firms avoid target ratios, of which most are likely to be the relatively smaller firms. This clearly
To support their growth and offset portfolio losses by their venture capital investors, management was ready to raise additional capital through a public equity offering.
The advantage of debt financing is that interests paid on such debt are tax deductible. If a company has the intention of maintaining a permanent debt, the present value of the tax shield can be obtained by discounting them by the expected rate of return demanded by the investors who hold the debt (this is a perpetuity, where in reality would be the maximum possible present value for the tax shield). This tax shield value reduces the tax bill and increases the cash payment to investors, increasing the value of their investments.
6. Yes, we think that it is better for the society if companies use debt. This allows people who have extra funds and need to invest it to earn interest revenue on their funds. Debt is generally less risky than equity investing because as we know debt has certain maturity date and
CCL is currently looking at an initial public offering (IPO) and long term debt as two options to help finance the new research and development (R&D) of new products. The bank loan can provided financial stability but will have the interest repaid over a longer time is higher and would be tax deductible. Banks may
The relationship between capital structure and firm value has been discussed frequently in the literature by different researcher accordingly, in both theoretical and empirical studies. It has also been discussed that whether the firm has any optimal capital structure that has been adopted by an individual firm, or whether the proportions of debt usage is completely irrelevant to the individual firm value.
Adding more debt into capital structure will reduce agency As more debts are added, agency cost of debt cost of equity as managers are left with less free cash flow Lowest agency cost of equity. would be further reduced. that could have been exploited for perk consumption. Since part of the earnings is paid to meet the debt repayments, dividends paid deceases comparing with actual 2011. But this is counter-balanced by increased earnings per share (EPS) as the shares outstanding is reduced Comparing with 20% leverage, dividend continues to decrease but EPS
Already in 1958, Modigliani and Miller have pointed the discussion of capital structure towards the cost of debt and equity. According to their first proposition, in a world of no corporate taxes and with perfect markets, financial leverage has no effect on a firm’s value. In their second proposition, they state that the cost of equity equals a linear function defined by the required return on assets and the cost of debt (Modigliani and Miller, 1958).
Now, the advantages of debt capital centre on its relative cost. Debt capital is usually cheaper than equity because, the pre-tax rate of interest is invariably lower than the return required by shareholders. This is due to the legal position of lenders who have a prior claim on the distribution of the company’s income and who in liquidation precede ordinary shareholders in the queue for the settlement of claims. Debt is usually secured on the firm’s assets, which can be sold to pay off lenders in the event of default, i.e. failure to pay interest and capital according to the pre-agreed schedule;
Capital structure is defined as the mix of the long-term sources of funds that a firm use. It is composed of equity, debt securities and affect long-term financing of the entity. It is made up by shareholder’s funds, long-term debt and preference share capital. The capital structure mostly focus on the proportions of debt and equity displayed in the company financial statements, especially in the balance sheet (Myers, 2001). The value of a firm can be calculated by the sum of the value of its firm’s debt and equity.