Dear King George III Letter Analysis

King George III did a lot of stuff to America for no reason. We shouldn’t of put up with as long as we did. George made people who owned house just let British soldiers come into their house and stay there for as long as they want. Some people do not have room for these soldiers just to come into their house like that. It was are for the people of America to just accept that. When the British troops committed a crime they got away with it. None of this is fair. British cut off all trading with the world and we are loosing everything we have because we can’t make money or get different things to survive. British is a bigger countries and far more developed than us at the moment so we can’t make money like they can. British thinks it's protecting their countries and job but it's not protecting or helping the Americas. George has never let us have any peace in our

Most Gracious Sovereign: We, your Majesty’s faithful subjects of the colonies of Codak, Inspirational, and Silver Shire, in behalf of ourselves and the inhabitants of those Colonies who have deputed us to represent them in General Congress, by this our humble Petition, beg leave to lay our Grievances before the throne.

This document contained the complaints of the colonists to many of the acts of Parliament. They objected to the oppression of Americans by distant British crown. They were taxed unfairly without representation and their trade was regulated for the benefit of England. To preserve the colonists’ rights, America’s independence form Britain was formally announced.

After a long time coming, the 13 colonies: New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina and Georgia, finally won their independence against the british government on July 4th 1776. This war of independence made not only political changes for the US but also around the world. After years of tension building up, the first strike for americans to be against britain was when the British government implemented the Stamp Act. This was a tax on all stamps to help reimburse Britain for the land they acquired for the 13 colonies. The colonist weren’t all that thrilled about this tax not only because the tax was high but because they had no representation

Don’t you ever imagine how your life might differ if the British weren’t making you do certain things and forbidding some things as well? Aren’t you getting tired of them enforcing more and more taxes along with their tyrannical rule? What if you somehow can get away from that and govern yourselves and build an empire that could one day rule the world? Well, this can stop being a dream and become a reality if help you us, your fellow colonists start a revolution against the British. Let us be free of Great Britain and their ridiculous acts loyalists and parliament in which we are not represented and be independent with our trade and manufacturing of our own products.

But any plan of imperial restructuring, no matter how well designed, faced an enormous obstacle. Why did the Stamp Act and Townshend Duty Act spark widespread unrest in the colonies? • The Colonists didn’t believe that Parliament had the constitutional right to tax them without their consent. They ended up protesting against the Stamp Act tax and the Townshend duties on imported goods in an attempt to preserve colonial liberties. Their protests included petitions for a redress and trade boycotts and also violent mob

In 1765, the English king was terribly in debt after the French and Indian War. His solution? The infamous Stamp Act that riled up citizens throughout the American colonies. But why were they so upset? They already payed less taxes than mainland englishmen, what was there to be angry about? These colonists were upset because this law was a violation of the very rights that they inherit as English citizens by the Bill of Rights.

In Document 1, Patrick Henry says “We have no representatives in the British Parliament. So how can the British Parliament place this tax on us ? It is simple; they cannot !” Patrick Henry thinks that the British tax laws are illegitimate because they have no representatives in British Parliament. The only way to make these taxes is to have a representative, when there are none at this time. The Americans believed that it was unjust because the British still tried to tax them without representatives. The American colonists took action to this by disobeying the law. But if they did this, they would be tried in the court.

Americans, who did not elect members of the parliament, opposed the act not only because their inability to pay the tax, but also because it violated the newly enunciated principle of “no taxation without representation.” The constitutional principles and protest tactics established during the stamp act crisis laid the groundwork for the American Revolution. Arguing that not only their own representative’s assemblies could tax them, the colonies insisted that the act was unconstitutional. And they escorted mob violence to intimidate stamp collectors into resigning. Parliament repealed the stamp act in 1766, but issued a declaratory act at the same time to reaffirm its authority to pass any colonial legislation it saw fit.

The 18th century can be marked as a period of internal and external struggle for the American colonists. From improper representation, to unfair taxes, such as the Stamp Act, to being overall abused by Britain, the colonists were justifiably angry. From this anger, the slogan “No taxation without representation” was born and quickly began to emerge from the lips of almost every colonist all across America. The demand from colonists everywhere for no taxation without representation weighed heavily as a symbol for democracy, as it revealed the mindset of many – Britain was using the hardworking colonists and took their money without even giving them a say – and laid the foundation for the American revolutionary war, allowing more arguments and

In the text, “Letter to Queen Victoria”, written by Lin Zexu in 1839, he implores the Queen of Great Britain, Queen Victoria, to stop her subjects from selling opium to the Chinese public. Zexu does so by exemplifying the past relationship of China and Britain, by moral persuasion, and by warnings and threats. However, Lin Zexu’s assumption of calling British subjects as Barbarian and compliant to Chinese rule ineffectively persuades.

The second source to be analyzed is Qian Long: Letter to George III, 1793. This source is a letter written to King George III of Britain. The letter was written by Qian Long, the emperor of China who ruled through much of the 18th century. The source was written in China 1793 and was in response to the intended audience, King George, and his request for trade privileges with

By 1765, at a Stamp Act Congress, all but four colonies were represented as the “Declaration of Rights and Grievances” was passed. They were determined to let Parliament know that they were equal to British citizens, that there would be no “taxation without representation,” and all efforts to stop tax on colonists would continue (Kennedy, etal 2011.) Although Lord Rockingham, the predecessor of Grenville, sought to repeal of the Stamp Act, this in no way meant Parliament was conceding their control. In fact, while the Stamp Act was repealed, another called the “Declaratory Act of 1766,” gave Parliament the authority to make laws binding the American Colonies, “in all cases whatsoever.” In 1767, George III passed the Townshend Acts to collect tax on glass, lead, paints, paper and, tea. Recognizing that tea was a favorite among the Americans, it ensured greater revenue the British government. Again, the colonists’ rights for representation were ignored and they started to boycott British goods and ultimately, smuggle tea. When the Quartering Act was passed, which specified that colonists were to give room and board to British troops, tension began to rise. For two years, the colonists tolerated British troops on their soil and their dissatisfaction with the British Parliament and King George III became evident through many violent riots, abusiveness of tax collectors and destruction of property. According to Kennedy, etal (2011), Parliament, continually met with

Lord Chesterfield express his values in an effort to guide his son throughout this letter of advice. Chesterfield uses this letter to help his son understand all of his concerns and how he is so disappointed in how his son turned out. He wants his son to be the best and excel in everything he puts his mind to.Lord Chesterfield uses diction and pathos to reveal that he values compliance and success.

Lastly, That it is the indispensable duty of these colonies, to the best of sovereigns, to the mother country, and to themselves, to endeavour by a loyal and dutiful address to his Majesty, and humble applications to both Houses of Parliament, to procure the repeal of the Act for granting and applying certain stamp duties, of all clauses of any other Acts of Parliament, whereby the jurisdiction of the Admiralty is extended as aforesaid, and of the other late Acts for the restriction of American Commerce.