When directors choose to adapt a novel or short story to fit the silverscreen, they often face the arduous task of keeping the author’s original plot in tow as well as, putting forth a believable product. In the case of Scotts Fitzgerald’s short story, The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, director, David Fincher and screenwriter, Eric Roth chose to scrap the original framework of the story and start anew. Although Fincher and Roth keeps the basic idea of Benjamin Button’s existence the same, their screen adaption tells a more sincere version of how it would feel to live life in reverse. However, both the director and screenwriter acknowledge that Benjamin’s tale cannot be told without giving the audience an explanation for why he is born …show more content…
This explanation of the clock also resembles Mark Twain’s affirmation that, the best part of life comes at the beginning while the worst comes at the end. Keeping this in mind, Fincher then presents the audience with the character of Benjamin Button, a child who is born with all the physical characteristics of an elderly person and who is thereby doomed to age backwards in the same way as Monsieur Gateau’s clock.
This addition of magical realism by the screenwriter and director to explain Benjamin’s story allows the viewer to have a visual metaphor of how it would look if time ran backwards. Like the Monsieur Gateau’s clock, Benjamin is an anomaly that is meant to defy the mechanisms of time. Yet, Benjamin and the clock both fall short on that front. Throughout the movie, the audience is shown how Benjamin is plagued with the same ailments as others even though he is ageing differently. Just like a regular human being, he experiences the lost of family and friends due to death and has to come to terms with the fact that he too will soon die. Ultimately, this shows that regardless of the way that an individual ages, death is inevitable. Even the clock eventually succumbs to “death” when it is submerged in water during the flooding of New Orleans at the end of the movie as Hurricane Katrina finally hits. Once this happens, the viewer must face the fact that
Abdomen: The lipases appeared unremarkable. The liver, spleen, gallbladder adrenals, kidneys, pancreas and abdominal aorta appeared unremarkable. The bowels seen on the study appeared thickened. Dilated appendix seemed consistent with acute appendicitis. All the structures of the abdomen appeared unremarkable. No free air was seen.
July 24, 1943 was a gloomy morning as Michael Holtzapfel became “another human pendulum”. Michael, like every living thing eventually will, had run out of time. In the days leading up to Michael’s death the weight of being able to go through life while his brother could not rested upon his shoulders slowly killing his will to live. As a result Frau Holtzapfel lost everything, much like Liesel later did after the bomb hit Himmel Street. Michael was, “Another clock, stopped”, although it was by choice. But everyone’s a clock just ticking away until their batteries run out whether it be caused by their deliberate resignation to life or they were just laid-off for eternity. After the bombs hit Himmel Street Hans, Rosa, and Rudy were also clocks
The temporal setting “oppress the character with the shape of a pendulum” (3) He fears its deadly velocity which represents his final hours of life. He feels terror of the doom that will “cut” his time on earth. As everyone knows, this symbolizes that death is inevitable.
In one of the extracts we were shown we see Tykwer uses distinctively visual techniques to show us Lola’s determination to save Manny. He utilises the use of a split screen with a close up shot of Manny and a close up tracking shot of Lola running to show how Lola is running towards him to try and save him. Then we hear the ticking of a clock and the top half of a clock comes onto the bottom of the screen to show how Lola is running out of time to save Manny. This is another example of how clocks are a reoccurring motif to symbolise time being overwhelming. This scene also demonstrates the love that Lola has for Manny and her determination to never give up trying to save him. This distinctively visual technique is utilised to hep show the audience that even with Lola’s everlasting love she is unable to change time and Manny slowly slips away from her, making himself unsaveable.
As Benjamin transition out of adolescent, he constantly struggles with the decision regarding his future and to find the best way of becoming a man. Ironically, it is his relationship with Mrs. Robinson that helps Benjamin transformation
In The Autobiography, Benjamin Franklin recounts the many paramount experiences throughout his life that shaped him into great American figure he was known to be. On the opening page, Franklin reveals the book’s epistolary format by writing, “Dear Son,” going on to admit that he’s made some mistakes in the past and to recollect that past is a way to relive it. By divulging his desire to “change some sinister Accidents & Events” (Franklin 3) the author indicates how important it is for his son to observe as he amends his mistakes. Pride, virtue and vanity play a pivotal role in Benjamin Franklin’s life and the way he portrays himself to others. Instances occur where the author is shown gloating about his great accomplishments and he puts
"Life is like a box of chocolates...You never know what you're going to get" says the main character Forrest in the beginning of the movie. Forrest Gump is the story of a man who overcomes numerous obstacles throughout different stages of his life and always seems to see the brighter side of things in the process. Through the movie’s entirety, outstanding performances from various award winning actors give this film’s involved and interesting plot a sense of realism that is far superior to that of other dramatic movies. Forrest Gump is about a simple man’s journey through complicated times; he has an IQ of 75 at the movie's start and stays pretty much on that level all the way through. His trove of facts
As the world turns around and around, our knowledge increases. Everyday that passes by is one lost to the overflow of information in our unending world. Soon, all that we will have left will be an innumerous amount of useless information. We might be understanding how our world works, but does it cost us? As we focus on the way our world works, we lose contact with the things that matter the most. We start focusing on how to survive in our world that we forget to live it. In literary works, The Rememberer and The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, both authors demonstrate the consequences of losing focus on what truly matters in life. Each main character follows a simply devolution, where they lose focus in life and become an unintelligent
“The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” written by Eric Roth and based on a short novel by F. Scott Fitzgerald is a story of an interesting man who lives his life backwards. The movie takes place in New Orleans during Hurricane Katrina and is told in a flashback perspective from the love of Benjamin’s life, Daisy and their daughter, Caroline. I heard many times throughout my life and nursing career, including from myself, “If I could only go back and know what I know now.” Benjamin Button lived this theory, a theory that seems very similar to the Gerotranscedence theory (Touhy & Jett, 2016, p. 37). Scheidt (2017) states in regards to his own aging “I am dealing with
In reading the Benjamin Franklin's Autobiography one can see the true character of a great man. But some may argue that this man, deep down inside, was not so great. Through out his book he touches on many aspects of his life. He lets the readers have a glimpse at what he was thinking and why he did things the way he did. Some critics do not agree that Franklin was such a noble man. They thought he might not have been telling his whole story, and that he was hiding a lot he had to offer. This paper will look at how one critic portrays Franklin---" Benjamin had no concern, really, for the immortal soul. He was too busy with the social man (292)." This critic is D.H. Lawrence.
Søren Kierkegaard, a Danish philosopher once said, "Life must be lived forward, but can only be understood backwards" (Quotes, 2008). This quote seemed fitting to Benjamin Button with him aging backwards and having to grow up in a world where here is growing young. “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button” is a short-story written by F. Scott Fitzgerald, the story was first published in Colliers Magazine in May of 1922. Following that, the screenplay was made, by Eric Roth. The screenplay was loosely based on the the short-story. They both do not have too many similarities besides the two aging backwards. However, with the movie being loosely based upon the short-story, there were more differences, including their families and their children.
Between F. Scott Fitzgerald’s short story and the film version of Benjamin Button, the development of purpose is analyzed differently. The short story develops the purpose through satirizing the expectations of society by focusing on human’s social mentality. On the contrary, the purpose of the film is developed through drama and magical realism, targeting the romance of Benjamin and Daisy through the obstacles of Benjamin’s dilemma.
Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography is an inspiring tale of his personal, as well as public achievement throughout his life. Franklin’s life embodies the exemplary model of a life composed of discipline, self-reliance and self improvement. From his humble beginnings as an apprentice candle and soap maker in his father’s business to a successful business man, author, philosopher, civil activist, politician scientist, inventor, and diplomat, above all Benjamin Franklin was, and still is, an American Icon and truly a pioneer of the American Dream.
At this late hour, the man of the crowd finds himself in one of the new department stores where customers are still milling about. It is here that Benjamin claims the flâneur makes his “last promenade…he roamed through the labyrinth of commodities as he had once roamed through the labyrinth of the city.” Contrary to Baudelaire’s view, Benjamin believes that the flâneur met his demise with the triumph of consumer capitalism, introduced by the urban changes instituted by Baron Haussmann. As intellect and reason ceased to soften the desires encouraged by the modern city, “the individual surrenders to the ever more extravagant, ever more conspicuous, displays of merchandise.” The flâneur could no longer find the inspiration and meaning for his
Now in the literary story Benjamin has a grandfather who at the start was antagonized, became to enjoy his grandson’s company. It is a brief account of his grandfather but a meaningful one as this was the first one who gave him a sense of acceptance. The film version gave him acceptance through Queenie and we never get to know a grandfather; though one could say the patrons at the old folk’s home could have been grandparent surrogates for Benjamin. The patrons at the old folks home taught him many things but his experience living there taught him not to fear death and what loss was about which, in a sense, desensitized the character so that when Queenie passes he is not visibly upset.