Jennifer Gleason
AIU
PHIL201-1203A-08 Introduction to Philosophy
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Logical fallacies
My whole paper will be over the logical fallacies and the examples I had made for each one. Now this all have to do with some kind of philosophy terms and what they truly mean but in my own words and examples. 1. Mere Assertion- Mere Assertion is when someone doesn’t want to give up an argument even known they can’t prove their right with no evidence. * Example: My daughter says she is right when she said she saw a movie last night, but she has no movie ticket to prove herself innocent.
2. Circular Reasoning- The Circular Reasoning is when every argument comes out the truth or considers the same evidence. *
…show more content…
* Example: My friend had but his girlfriend’s name on him and every time he would go out he would cheat on her and say it was his sister’s name. So it would be argument between the two of them.
7. Sweeping Generalization- Sweeping Generalization is like when the police department has two ideas that could lead to the story of what had happen in the case. * Example: A women had got killed and the police had two ideas who could’ve been the killer. So the police had narrowed it down to two conclusions.
8. Slippery Slope- Slippery Slope is like the alphabets because each letter has to come after each other to work out. * Example: When they have a certain road for truck drivers to drive on and they decide to take it away for something else. Than that means it won’t ever be used again for the truck drivers unless they go through the steps to use it again.
9. Equivocation or Changing Meanings- Equivocation or changing meanings is where I would be making my argument and then switch it to another argument to hide away from the truth. * Example: My youngest son was making an argument with us to get away from the truth and when he tried to turn to another argument, I told him it’s better to tell the truth it will make you feel better.
Reference
Higgins, Solomon. “Logical Fallacies.” The Big
The term deception means the deliberate act of misleading an individual some may refer to deception as “little white lies.” Deception has long been used in the criminal justice area by officers in the detecting process of criminal cases, and is one of the most commonly used tools in the investigative process. Investigators use deception in the detecting process. This involves misleading criminals during the investigative and interrogative stages, to gather enough information about the
Bandwagon fallacy for helping readers to realize easily all of the arguments along the story. It is
The police investigation is strongly linked to the labelling concept. Since the community of Crittenden along the police were inspired that satanic cult was responsible for the three eight-year-old boys. One of the possible explanations that the police have considered was cult activity. Although, Echols denied connections with Satanism. After additional interaction between Jerry Driver, the probation officer, and Echols, Driver was more suspicious of Echols involvement in a satanic cult as he further shared his doubt to the police. Hence, this indicates the labelling theory as the police assumptions and stereotypes for the murders influenced their decision not to carry out the correct protocols for their policing. The police thought for sure that the teenage boys were guilty. This is also because Echols and Baldwin were both social outcast (retreatists) who reject the cultural goods and the institutionalized means. Overall, the police investigation was heavily biased in which this can be considered to the theory; the crime of the powerful through militarized police. Due to their presumption in labelling the individuals as criminals, the police use their state power to manipulate and control the case. This is because the police have authorities and they are in charge of what evidence is found and what evidence is brought to light.
22. A ________________ is a fundamental form of reasoning where one proposition is inferred from two others.
| Demonstrates solid understanding of the concept of reasoning fallacies and identifies the most important fallacies in the argument by name and discusses their
The practices of police can best be explained in the elaboration of case probability versus class probability. Case probability is when police take specific evidence with concrete proof in regards to the victim of a crime to accuse one of a crime. Class probability, however, is when police generalize normal committers of the specific crime to accuse one for it. For example, if police aimed to prosecute a seller of marijuana and Hispanics were typically known to commit such a crime, class probability would be integrated into case investigation if police searched every Hispanic on site for the
In other words, this part of the argument may be reliable to some, but the way it is presented to the audience negates that.
Coherentism is the view that individuals have justified beliefs, which result from a finite system of beliefs that promote each other non-circularly without the requirement for justification outside of the system (2014). For coherentism, justification is a procedure in which all of the beliefs are seen wholly as a system rather than individual parts. For example, V", V', and V are beliefs. The beliefs V", V', and V work together to achieve epistemic justification without the need for any further
Taking a look at the doubting game, Elbow writes that in order to doubt well, it helps if “you make a special effort to extricate yourself from the assertions..”(Lines 12 and 13). Additionally, placing the assertions against one another, letting them work against each other for the pursuit
Teaching higher order thinking skills is not a recent need. It is apparent that students, at all levels of education, are lagging in problem-solving and thinking skills. Fragmentation of thinking skills, however, may be the result of critical thinking courses and texts. Every course, especially in content subjects, students should be taught to think logically, analyze and compare, question and evaluate.
induce the speaker to withdraw it and to admit that it had been mistaken, must
The next section is titled Defense. It goes over logical fallacies, their downfalls, how to spot them, and much more. Such as, the “Seven Deadly Sins” of rhetoric, and the defensive tools of practical wisdom.
This is called trivialisation/denial. You can also see that some people try to add new elements to their beliefs that make the picture fit. This is called creating consonance and an example of it could be: “my friend always
The concepts of critical thinking and creative thinking are both gaining increasing importance in the world today. Critical thinking allows people to understand difficult concepts in a manner that is clearer and more defined. They can more readily understand those concepts if they employ critical thinking. In all portions of everyday life, a person is expected to make independent judgments. Those judgments are based on experience and knowledge. Without the ability to think critically, every situation that a person comes across would have to be considered in isolation from all other situations. When a person encounters a problem that is a new one, he or she may be able to use critical thinking to solve those problems.
Knowledge is generated through critical and creative thinking. Creative thinking is something new or original that is created with value. Critical thinking is a type of thinking that questions assumptions and validates or invalidates a current belief or something that is said to be previously true. Knowledge is created through the culmination of generally accepted assumptions and creativity. How do you separate general assumptions and creativity? These two types of thinking can be easily separated in regards to concrete or realistic ideas compared to abstract or original ideas however to generate new, acceptable knowledge critical and creative thinking must interact together. The questioning of established beliefs with the creation of