preview

Critical Analysis Of Annie Dillard's 'The Deer At Providencia'

Decent Essays

Annie Dillard:
The Deer at Providencia
A Critical Analy
Annie Dillard is an American Author, she is known for her narrative prose in fields of fiction and non-fiction. From her wide array of published works this critical analysis will be focused on her work ‘The Deer at Providence’
Awards: Pulitzer Prize for General Non-Fiction more Born: April 30 1945 (age 71)
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Spouse: R. H. W. Dillard (m.–1975)Robert D. Richardson
Influenced by: Henry Davi
The Deer at Providencia: Tone, Theme and Type of Essay
A Descriptive Essay with a negative, dark Tone:-
 The Essay is a descriptive type essay with a negative, dark but optimistic tone. Annie
Dillard manages to carry out this tone throughout the passage by contrasting …show more content…

Moreover Alan McDonald being subjected to suffering once again is what Annie Dillard cannot explain.
We see this in the line:
“will someone please explain to Alan McDonald…to the deer, what is goi ng on?” Why is one’s suffering natural, and another’s not? Why do they both suffer? The author knows that there is suffering and unfairness, yet the question she puts to the reader is why
Theme: Natural Cycle Of Suffering
The primary theme throughout the essay is the cycle of suffering, its mystery and universality in life as it affects people in all walks of their life. Her idea of suffering is it is part of a natural …show more content…

 The deer’s death was an inevitable suffering as she believes it served the purpose of food to the native tribes in the amazon.
 But later on contrasting it with Alan Mcdonalds suffering she is unable to explain it and feels the cycle of suffering is flawed.
Annie Dillard’s Inference
The Narrator feels suffering is something we cannot control and is ridiculous to cry over as she has experienced being helpless and useless in the situation of the derr and the burning man. In both the instances she could not save the victims. The implied conclusion is to accept that the suffering is present in the world, but also accept the fact that there is nothing we humans can do about it.
Humans while experiencing suffering start questioning it when they should rather be accepting it, this is the message the author is trying to convey. She feels that this is something humans go through in their cycle of life and is ‘ridiculous’ to cry upon.
‘’ Medicine, cannot ease their pain; drugs just leak away, soaking the sheets, because there is no skin to hold them in. People just lie there and weep. ''
She using this line to describe our human nature of controlling the inevitable pain and suffering we must endure.
Thoughts we can draw from the

Get Access