preview

Countermovement Jump

Decent Essays

Peak propulsive power (PP) has been identified as a determinant of athletic performance and training to develop peak power has become common practice in professional and amateur sport (Cronin & Sleivert, 2005; Haff & Nimphius, 2012; Hansen, Cronin, Pickering & Douglas, 2011; Kawamori & Haff, 2004). A countermovement jump (CMJ) has been established as an valid and reliable measure of PP (Markovic, Dizdar, Jukic & Cardinale, 2004; Sheppard Cormack, Taylor, McGuigan, & Newton 2008). Performance of CMJs on land under progressive loading produces a power curve displaying peak power and the decline of PP as the load increases (Haff & Nimphius, 2012; Kawamori & Haff, 2004; Sheppard et al., 2008; Stone et al, 2003). As the popularity of an aquatic environment increases as a training and rehabilitative tool, the purpose …show more content…

2007; Ploeg et al., 2010; Stem & Jacobson 2007). Arazi and Asadi (2011) reported at the end of an eight-week plyometric program, during which one group of young male basketball players trained in the water and another group trained on land, both groups showed significantly improved sprint times (36.5m and 60m) from baseline to post testing with no significant differences between treatment groups (land vs. water). The aquatic training group also showed significant differences in increased leg strength when compared with the control group, but no significant differences when compared to the land training group. White and Smith (1999) also reported increased muscle strength at the end of an eight week aquatic training program. Arazi, Coetzee, and Asadi (2012) repeated a study similar to Arazi & Asadi (2011) and reported similar outcomes- the aquatic and land trained groups displayed similar improvements in anaerobic power. The results of these studies imply aquatic based plyometric programs are at least equal to land based plyometric

Get Access