Thomas Herzog Essay

Being environmentally friendly isn’t merely a trend. After thousands of years of using the earth’s resources, we have finally come to realize that we are destroying this beautiful gift we were honored with. Architects play an influential role in trying to preserve this gift by encouraging a multitude of strategies that can be more cost efficient in the long run, be more comfortable for its users, and most importantly, have a lower carbon footprint. Strategies can include drastic changes to heat and air systems, construction material selections, or even specific design details to the architecture of a building that would reduce the amount of energy it consumes.

The sloping orientation of the landscape maximises public space whilst having a relatively small footprint. Some roofing areas of the building

From the observation tower the horizontal building’s three parallel bands can be seen that extend into the lush landscape. The architects’ concept was to immerse the museum in nature by creating a set of three bracketed pavilions under one roof surrounded by gardens. The roof can be seen as

The building itself is a large white structure with a massive rotunda and four wings coming off the rotunda like arms. Surrounding the building are small parks and benches, as well as the busy sidewalk, which on Saturdays is packed with farmers’ market customers. The streets surrounding the square are lined with excellent local cafes, restaurants, and bars.

The developed surface that rises from the ground can be defined by wall decors, doors, or curtains, all of which can give extrusions and details to an otherwise flat and 2D surface. While the interior surfaces are ornate with plasterwork and decorations, the ground surface has furniture’s that occupies

Different architects have different styles because they are trying to get at different things. Architecture is not just about making something beautiful anymore, it is about trying to get across a set of ideas about how we inhabit space. Two of the most famous architects of the twentieth century, one from each side, the early part and the later part up until today each designed a museum with money donated by the Guggenheim foundation. One of these is in New York City, it was designed by Frank Lloyd Wright. The other is in bilbao, Spain, and it was designed by Frank Geary. My purpose of this paper is to interrogate each of these buildings, glorious for different reasons, to show how each architect was expressing their own style.

The ‘Glass House’ is a building in which personal qualities are a vital component of the construction framework. The house is focusing on the correlation between an individual and buildings. There are architectural rules including conventions that establish a guide and maintain traditional approaches to building structures. However, Phillip Johnson operates against these standards of design rules and highlights the modernistic period due to the buildings ' orientation and non-traditional materials. The structure of the house is revealing the materials and aesthetic qualities.

With the addition of an amphitheater, I hope to bring more street performers to the square, which will then bring more people in to stay for longer periods of time while enjoying this time. With more trees than in the current plan, the strong winds will be buffered, allowing visitors to be more comfortable. The greater amount of green space hopes to draw more people in from the surrounding communities to relax and have fun outdoors especially in warmer moths of the year. The design of the pathways permits passersby to more efficiently get from one corner of the square to another. This redesign will also still allow for the square’s current uses to continue including the farmers market. Benches facing inwards on the paths will allow for people to better interact with one another and rest easily. These purposes will attract more people to the square and keep them there for

While Moses Herzog sits in the Chicago police station after he has crashed his rental car, the narrator of Saul Bellow's work exclaims angrily, "See Moses? We don't know one another" (299). This is the lone moment in the book where the narrator explicitly suggests some separation between himself and Herzog. Much of the rest of the novel provides an unclear division between the narrator and the main character. I would argue that this unclear division occurs because these two figures, the narrator and Herzog, are in fact the same person. There are small logistical hints in the text that this is true. But these small elements of the text exist alongside much larger similarities between Herzog, and the

The entryways of the building come from four different sides and meet in the middle. The overall shape of the building creates different views and facades. The building was not created just on the looks of it; it is made up of a three dimensional, stimulating, tactile human thing.

In the case study of Macquarie Bank building, the diagonal pattern of the external frame creates a shell like exterior to protect the glass wall panels, which serve to allow penetration of natural light. It is this natural light and continuation of the structural display that further defines the interior (figure xx). Alberto Campo Baeza describes tectonic architecture as one that “defends itself from light, that has to look after and veil its open spaces to be able to control the light that pour into it” (Baeza 2009 p275). This is evident in the atrium of the Macquarie building. Upon entering the space, you walk upon warm recycled gum-tree hardwood floors that juxtapose the stark contrast of the white structure supporting the meeting space pods. As you can see in figure (xx), the internal space is dictated by the central atrium separating the east and west sides of the building, forming a protective shield for the workspaces while allowing connection to the outside world through an abundance of natural light and visible sky. Khan explains that “all spaces worthy of being called a space need natural light” (Khan 1961. p14) which is observable in the atrium space of Macquarie Bank building and influences the working environment of its inhabitants. The atrium design and central interior of the building is a poetic use of the tectonic language. It is the embodiment of a ‘hut’ design that reaches to the sky to enabling an abundance of natural light. Showcasing the external diagrid, which is visible from the interior through the curtain of glass walls to the exterior, the interior space additionally represents a lyrical use of materials and joinery. The structural frames on display through the buildings core draws occupants away from their desks, by

Question 1. Choose an architect or practice whose work is covered by or relevant to this course and discuss critically one or more of their design projects or drawings or urban proposals as precedent case-studies. Selectively situate this work in relation to their body of work, and against the practices and concerns of the period. Focus on the architectural qualities of a specific key aspect of the design of the projects. Selectively consider how they might relate to the historical situation, cultural values, theoretical concerns and design practices of the time. This may involve a selective analysis of compositional design practices, material fabrication production and the experiential reception of built outcomes of the projects.

Architecture was born to serve the essential needs of human life. But architecture is not simply a function, capabilities such as objects, objects. The existence of the same architecture of human life has created the spiritual values​​. Architecture itself has aesthetic value, artistic value is part of the factors. There are small works, with the ancient architecture, over hundreds of years still exist. Many buildings that were built with permanent materials, not too stable structural, mechanical and material in its original meaning; but it still exists, and shine. Because his works contained the great cultural value. In other words, it is the culture of sustainable architecture. Government sustainability "invisible" This has tremendous power, a force without any harm, destruction was, whether natural or man. Conversely, can sustainable building structures, sustainable beauty is destroyed by other factors, such as planning, or administrative guidelines on the management of any construction or it be eliminated by bringing the non-human elements, without the support and consensus of the community.

As people known, to use renewable resource and to save energy or comfortable indoor environment is far from the overall picture. Because construction mentioned above is an industry which include many aspects such as land use and application of advanced technology, etc. Therefore if we want to define what is green building we should recognize the whole industrial chain included each aspects and unintended environment, social, economic, consequence brought possibly of complex activity. Kats (2003) in his article stated that the sustainable or green building should deal with those key points: environment, resource & energy consumption, impact on people, financial impact and the world at large which is a broader set of issues such as ground water recharge or global warming, as well governmental policies are typically concerned about (Kats, 2003, P. 1). And another institute, Office of the federal Environmental Executive (2003) defined green building as the practice of increasing the efficiency with which

Stability and balance is also achieved through the incorporation of the vertical and horizontal planes. In the southwest facade of the building the vertical slits are balanced with the horizontal planes created by the cubes, cornice and the ornamental horizontal band that runs halfway through the walls. These vertical and horizontal planes further dictate a rhythmic continuity throughout the building. Building's scale is rather modest in comparison to its site and the surrounding landscape and the smooth texture of the facade helps its integration to the environment. (Figure 4)