preview

Corruption In Rome

Decent Essays

During the Fifth century, Germanic tribes from the north invaded the Western Roman Empire and sacked Rome (González pp. 260 & 270). This created political and social disorder. The Empire was then divided into separate independent kingdoms (González p. 269). As a result, the church tended to fill the void for order created by the political instability (González p. 260). However, as various kingdoms became established, local church leaders began to be appointed by kings rather than the churches (González p. 273). And, since the church had acquired much land, bishops became lords rather than pastors (González p. 273). The political instability cre-ated by a lack of a strong central government led to an increasingly feudal society (González p.318).

Because they were organized, the church and the monastic movement were able to preserve much of the Christian teachings and ancient knowledge from the Empire. The church was also …show more content…

273). For protection, church leaders often made alliances with local rulers who in turn needed the support of the church (Placher p. 134). Secular authorities often appointed church leaders. Simony and moral corruption became common, and church leaders became more concerned with political maneuvering than with tending to their flocks (González p. 323-325, 333).

Overall, there were positive and negative consequences for the church resulting from the changes that occurred during the medieval period. The preservation of Christianity by the church and the monks cannot be understated. The corruption that occurred in the church carried the name of God in vain. Could the church have maintained the simple fellowship that it started with and still maintained its identity and teachings gained from the apologists and teachers of the second through fourth centuries? I do not know what that would have looked

Get Access