preview

Corcoran State Prison Summary

Good Essays
Open Document

Steve Rigg and Richard Caruso were prison guards at the Corcoran State Prison in San Joaquin, California in 1988. Corcoran State Prison was the most dangerous maximum-security for violent inmates resided in, they stayed in their own cells all days. Those dangerous inmates only had one hour allowed of exercise in the Security Housing recreation yard. Rigg and Caruso were correctional officers were on their duties in the Department of Security Housing Unit (SHU.) During their shift, they witnessed the death of inmate, Preston Tate. Tate was fighting against other inmates and then shot by a correctional officer unethically. From this moment, it changed their ethnical reflections and became whistleblowers. In the situation of …show more content…

Rigg and Caruso were aware of the Department of Corrections would covered up the violent death of Tate. In the Moral rules level, they wanted to act against their correctional culture to expose the factors of unethical behavior within the Corcoran State prison to the media and FBI. Their intent of purpose was to address the unethically moral codes from the correctional culture that would sought to be whistle blow. (Copper, 2012) stated,” Moral rules we acquire through the socialization process from professional experiences” (p.20), refers how Rigg and Caruso wanted to alleged the brutality and violent incidents by supervisor and officers to the media and …show more content…

For Tate’s death, it was their final particular condition to became whistleblowers. The fate of Tate’s death and incarnated inmates’ lives depended on both guards’ whistleblowing actions. .” (Dryburgh, 2009; Arax 1996a) refers “the case of the Corcoran whistle-blowers illustrates both negative and positive aspects of Perry’s public service motivation theory.” At last, both actions’ whistleblowing actions were justified and recognized in the post-ethical level. Truth, loyalty, integrity, and justice were their intent of actions when they discouraged the undesirable behaviors of correctional officers and supervisors. (Dryburgh, 2009, p.158) refers “Extreme commitment could lead to fanatical behavior, suspension of individual judgment . . . termed ‘failures of socialization’ ” (1990, 370).” For this reason, guards used their ethical reflection based on the correctional socialization failure with prison, their courage urged them to dismissed the unethically moral codes to save inmates and cleared the falsified report of Tate’s

Get Access