When the British landed in the New World, they came across a people they had to learn from. These people were the Native Americans. In order to over come their differences, the British had to learn about the Native American culture. Three stories recorded the beliefs about how the world came to be. The Sky Tree and How the World was Made were stories told my the Native Americans, while the British used The Book of "Genesis" to tell how the world was created. All three stories have there differences and similarities. To begin with, in all three stories the characters responsible for creating the world all lived in the sky, the animals all had a role in the stories, and man was created last. In The Book of "Genesis" it is recorded God lived …show more content…
To illustrate, the Americans had three powers involved in the government and the Native Americans had three parties in the council of the Mohawk. The two cultures agreed about how many groups should be involved in the system of government. All of the parties helped make important decisions for their nations. Then the two nations had the same voting rights. Americans were allowed to vote for political office, allowing them to choose their presidents and governors and in a like manner the Native Americans voted for chiefs and what would happen throughout the nations, giving the individual's the power to have a say about their nation. Finally "The Articles of the Constitution" is split into articles that tell what each article is about and in "Constitution of the Iroquois Nations" is separated into sections that describe what each article writes about. This helps the different declarations to be easily found by the people. It also helps clarify what the constitutions are stating. These similarities illustrate how the two cultures thought alike while creating their
The Iroquois Constitution and the United States Constitution are different and similar in structure, symbols, and council. In the Iroquois Dekanawidah uses symbols to represent peace and other things. The United States Constitution does not use symbols.
United States Americans have always learned about the constitution, but they don’t know everything about it. What most people don’t know is that the U.S Constitution is based off the Iroquois Constitution. The Iroquois is a group of Indians that were having conflict between their five nations; because of this they created a constitution to unite and give structure to their nations. Their constitution is mostly different than the U.S. Constitution, but there are a few similarities between the two.
Another difference is how they were written. The Iroquois Constitution was written in first person throughout the entire document. Meaning the writer of this constitution often uses “I”, “I am Dekanawidah and with the Five Nations confederate lords I plant the Tree of the Great Peace.” (24). While on the other hand the United States Constitution was written third person. “All legislative Powers herein shall be vested in a Congress of the United
The Constitutions of both the Iroquois and the United States have similarities and differences between them. The Iroquois constitution came earlier in history than the U.S one did. Some of the same ideas that were in the Iroquois' constitution were carried over to some of the ideas that we use in our government today. In this paper I will compare and contrast these ideas as they relate with one another. Ideas like Vito Power, When a Leader Gets Sick, 3 Branches of Government, A Bicameral Legislature, and impeachment are portrayed in both of these constitutions.
The U.S. Constitution and Iroquois Constitution have very different types of structures. The U.S. Constitution states, “Each house may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and with the Concurrence of two, expel a Member” (Madison, Section). This constitution has a very sincere, businesslike tone, and is written out like a contract. This constitution is wrote in headings, articles, and sections. The U.S. Constitution is all about business and making sure everyone is following their rules. The U.S. Constitution does not have as much peace in it like the Iroquois Constitution does. The Iroquois Constitution says, “... see the council fire of the Great Peace” (Dekanawidah, 25). This constitution has a very hopeful, severe tone, and is written out like a narrative, oral tradition
The Beaver Wars were fought from 1640 - 1701, this war was also called the French and Iroquois Wars. The war was fought between the Iroquois Confederacy and the French and their Native allies from the Huron and Algonquin tribes who were from the central Great Lakes area (Ohio Valley). The Iroquois Confederacy consisted of Native Americans from five different tribes Mohawk, Oneida, Onondaga, Cayuga and Seneca people who were from the eastern part of Great Lakes (New York state). The Mohawk tribe began to establish trading agreements with the Dutch exchanging beaver pelts for guns, however the Mohawks also wanted to expand their territory expanding their market in the Great Lakes region. The French and their allies took offense to the expansion by the Iroquois Confederacy and a war
The New York Times stated in an article, “One of the main influences on the framers of the Constitution was the unwritten democratic constitution under which the Iroquois Confederacy had operated since the 16th century, according to a group of American Indians and scholars.” (nytimes). So what is the United States Constitution? “The U.S. Constitution established America’s national government and fundamental laws, and guaranteed certain basic rights for its citizens. It was signed on September 17, 1787, by delegates to the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, presided over by George Washington” (history.com). Also within the constitution, there is a system of checks and balances within the government. The idea of having three different branches of government and checks and balances is to ensure that not one single branch could have all power or abuse their power (history.com). The three branches of
How come they have never met each other? Hey, but they all live in Canada and all met the Europeans! I wonder if the Europeans ever mentioned one tribe to the other? Anyway, the Inuit, Haida, and the Iroquois are the same in many ways but are a lot different.
The Constitutions of both the Iroquois and the United States have similarities and differences between them. The Iroquois constitution came earlier in history than the U.S one did. Some of the same ideas that were in the Iroquois’ constitution were carried over to some of the ideas that we use in our government today. In this paper I will compare and contrast these ideas as they relate with one another. Ideas like Vito Power, When a Leader Gets Sick, 3 Branches of Government, A Bicameral Legislature, and impeachment are portrayed in both of these constitutions.
The Native American Indian tribe called the Iroquois contributed greatly toward America. They have many stories about the world, and how things came to be the way they are. They have one story about the creation of the world. They use oral traditional elements in this story which is represented by nature. They also use a romantic aspect, which is represented by God’s and the super natural.
Imagine sailing on a boat with some crew mates. Everyone is asleep and you fall into the water after leaning too far over the side of the ship. Unable to get help, you swim until you find an island, thinking you will be able to hunt there. But instead, the tables are turned. You become the hunted. In Richard Connell’s short story, “The Most Dangerous Game,” he uses to literary elements suspense, conflict, and setting to pull the reader into the story and make them feel as if they are actually living out all of the events of the story themselves. Without these literary elements, the story would be uneventful, dull, and boring. Richard Connell does a fantastic job of using literary elements in his writing to make a fast-paced and eventful story
During week two of ethnomusicology class Native American culture was discussed. In this essay, the specific culture honed in on will be the Iroquois. The original location of the Iroquois was in upstate New York between Niagara Falls and the Adirondack Mountains. They conquered a lot of land in northeastern U.S. and eastern Canada. The Iroquois population in 1660 was roughly 25,000 people. Today there are about 30,000 people with at least some Iroquois background. While Iroquois society was far from being a female dominated matriarchy, Iroquois women enjoyed social equality and respect. In New York and Wisconsin, the Iroquois culture and traditions are still preserved today. Some words that best characterize modern Iroquois are traditional,
The United States Constitution was heavily influenced by the Iroquois Confederacy’s political theory, though Eurocentric history lessons often teach about the French and Greek influence. In 1988, the House Concurrent Resolution 331 passed which recognized the Iroquois Confederacy’s contribution to the U.S. Constitution. Even after H.Con.Res 331 was passed, the Iroquois Confederacy’s influence continues to be disregarded, most people have to wait until specific classes in higher education to learn about the connection. With the whitewashing of history, many Native American influences have been overlooked that directly correlate to the creation of the U.S. Constitution, though the ‘Founding Fathers’ did revise the Iroquois’ political theory to better match the ‘freedom’ of the U.S.
Margaret Atwood uses a variety of different ways to achieve the marginalization of women in her book The Handmaid’s Tale. The novel creates an entirely new social construct and redefines language to create the marginalization of women. Heavily relying on narrative voice, the novel unravels Gilead, a city set in a dystopian future where women are nothing more than objects. Men are the only ones who are ascribed to authority while women are marginalized as subordinates. The novel was written in 1985, a time when women were campaigning for equal rights.
In order to understand the functions of totalitarian movements we must first begin with the understanding of how they come to power. On this matter Arendt stresses that in order for totalitarian regimes and leaders to maintain power, they are reliant on mass support. Unlike other political groups that are reliant upon proportional strength, totalitarian movements depend on numbers, meaning that it is almost impossible for a totalitarian regime to exist in countries with small populations (Arendt OT, 308). Therefore, without the confidence of the masses, neither Hitler nor Stalin would have been able to overcome relentless struggles and maintain their leadership over large populations (Arendt OT, 306). Arendt specifies that the term ‘masses’