Consensus Model Apn

Consensus Model for APRN Regulation has 4 components: Licensure, Accreditation, Certification, and Education It supports goals of the ANCC APRN certification process and will align the inter-relationships among licensure, accreditation, certification, and education to create a more uniform practice across the country. Its aim is to improve consistency and clarity and take APRNs to the next level and also enhance patient care (“American Nurses Credentialing Center," 2015)

With increasing number of Physicians choosing not to go into primary care and increasing number of baby boomers crossing 65 years by the 2030, there is a very high demand for APRNs to fill up those gaps. The consensus model, which was first initiated in 2004, has been revised many times and finalized in 2008. It helps to regulate APRNs with licensure, accreditation, certification and education (Stanley, 2012).

Hi Swanthi, great post on the APN Consensus Model. In your post you mentioned many healthcare organizations had “criticized the inconsistencies in APRN practice and brought up concerns of patient safety issues due to these competency irregularities.” Although this model was developed in 2008, there are still many regulations and unclear terms that need to be clarify. I can see for nurses that are just beginning their APRN education will be able to eventually achieve the same licensure, accreditation, credentials, and education (LACE), but what about those are currently practicing now? If I was the APRN that had to take extra courses to be licensed in my state than I would feel a bit dissatisfied when another APRN from another state that required

The customs and practices of the APRN has been restricted in many states. The sociocultural aspects of APRN have been a collaborative effort with a physician under the standards of care agreement. When a patient needs to be seen by a provider the APRNs have

As resistant as some states’ legislative and regulatory bodies are to grant APNs autonomy of practice, the damage being done by over-regulation is clear (Safriet, 1992). Physicians are forced into a position to either supervise the APN’s practice or be constantly consulted for approval of their practice decisions. Safriet (1992) described that in and of itself, this constant supervision may appear to patients that the APN is not competent to provide adequate or care equivalent to that of a physician. If the role of the APN is to bridge gaps in health care by relieving the medical establishment of some of the patient load by performing the same function as a physician in a primary care setting, it seems wholly unnecessary to restrain their scope of practice in those areas. This type of restrictions affect cost and patient care accessibility (Safriet, 1992). This was a problem stated in the article, however 25 years later, populations of patients remain unseen or cared for and APNs continue to be underutilized (Safriet, 1992). Rigolosi and Salmond (2014) cite the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (AANP) when they state that not utilizing nurse practitioners due to practice restrictions costs $9 billion annually in the US (p. 649).

Defining the scope of practice for an advanced practice nurse (APRN) can be a difficult task. Currently, in the United States, each state has its own policies regarding APRN scope of practice. State policies/laws vary from restrictive to independent. States under a restrictive policy of APRN scope of practice may have strict physician collaboration regulations. For example Missouri requires the collaborating physician to review a percentage of charts and be within so many miles of the APRN’s work place. Restrictive scope of practice can also limit prescriptive authority and decrease reimbursement of services (Hain & Fleck, 2014). States with more independent scope of

Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) has evolved tremendously since it was establish in 1965 to service vulnerable populations, however there are still barriers that must be addressed in order to free APRNs from limitation imposed by state scope of practice (SOP) laws and payers, which disrupts health care financing/costs, access, delivery, and quality patient care. Currently, only one third of the states in the U.S. permit APRNs to fully practice within their scope without limitations (Hain & Fleck, 2014; Yee, Boukus, Cross, and Samuel, 2013).

The APRNs Regulatory Model specializes roles and titles and population foci within a regulatory framework (Hamric, Hanson, Tracy, & O'Grady, 2014). This was implemented to resolve the issue of inconsistent rules, policies and standards of care across states. APN practice is faced with many barriers or obstacles put in place with notion of regulating practice and provision of quality and safe care. This have led to reviewing of the regulations to broaden the spectrum of APN practice as health care is fast evolving. Diverse regulatory criteria like variable accreditation standards, licensing requirements, inconsistent population foci and scopes of practice, represent barriers to optimize APRN function within today’s complex health care system

The scope of the practice for APRN is to consider the specific population and territory of their independent practice to determine regulatory model which is appropriate and effective to the need of the community

These organizations developed the Consensus Model document in 2008 to unify practice, identify APRN clinical roles, identify the acceptable titles to for NPs, and define the requirements for general practice and licensure. Note to mention that laws and regulations statute on the APN scope of practice may vary by states, whereas some adhere to full scope of practice, other to reduced practice, or restricted practice. For instance, the state of Florida defines advanced registered nurse practitioner as a licensed person with ability to practice professional nursing and certified to in advanced or specialized nursing practice (Buppert, 2011). The four advanced clinical specialized roles include certified registered nurse anesthetists, certified nurse midwives, clinical nurse specialist, and nurse practitioners (Buppert, 2011). In terms of licensure, 46 states out of 50 require nurse practitioners to pass a certification exam. The Florida Board of Nursing requires certification by an appropriate specialty board and graduation from a program leading to a master’s degree (Buppert,

There have been concerns regarding the identification and credentialing of advanced practiced registered nurses (APRNs). A APRN is a registered nurse who has successfully completed an accredited graduate-level education program, in which the individual is well prepared and successfully passed the nationwide certification examination (APRN Consensus Model, 2008). However, there are still debating issues of who would fall under the APRN category. The National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) has identified four APRNs who are deem fit to be called ARPNs; however, only two will be named. They would be certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) and certified nurse practitioners (CNPs). Whereas, the nurse informatics and the nurse administrations are not considered to be APRNs; although, they are still license registered nurses but they do not provide direct patient care and are not required to take the national certification examination (ARPN Consensus Model, 2008).

Reimbursement for the advanced practice nurse (APN) is improving but how they fit into reimbursement systems is vey important. One question that arises is if the APN should be paid the same fee for service as a physician or should only a percentage of the payment be received. Most third-party reimburses, which include a few large insurance companies are now reimbursing APNs and more states are getting on board with reimbursements by developing reimbursement models for APNs (Hamric, 2009). For example, Aetna US Healthcare, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kentucky, Medicare and Medicate all credential NPs as primary care providers and pay at 85% of the physician rate. Tricare of Kentucky credentials NPs and pays 100%.

Credentialing from advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) perspective is defined as “furnishing the documentation necessary to be authorized by a regulatory body or institution to engage in certain activities and use a certain title” (Hanson, 2014). Credentialing is also define from a local institutional process that consider specific documentations for APRN before they assume the practice role as APRN within their facility. In health care system, credentialing ensures individuals meet required standards of practice and is prepared to perform those duties implied by the credentials. National certification and education are considered as part of credentialing for APRN to acquire basic level of competence to practice. (Hanson, 2014)

The role of the Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) is expanding internationally throughout the healthcare system. Since the initiation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in 2010, there has been an increased need for APNs due to the growing demand for primary care services and increased population that have gained healthcare coverage (Lanthrop & Hodnicki, 2014). The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of APN and develop a professional development plan for my future career.

The APRN Consensus Model was released in July of 2008 to define advanced practice registered nurse, identify the titles to be used by APRNs, and define specialty area of practice. The Consensus Model also describes population foci, suggests a process for recognition of new APRN roles, and recommends requirements for implementation (American Nurses Association [ANA], 2010). The APRN regulatory model helps uniform scope of practice of APRN across the United States, which benefit individual APRN, enhance patient outcomes, and improve the quality of care. Consensus Model consists of Licensure, Accreditation, Certification, and Education. The Education criteria in LACE Consensus Model relate to all APRN programs regardless of master’s or doctoral