Consciousness: A Discussion Of The Mind-Body Problem

The paper has properly integrated examples and provides many connections between the source and what it

Being able to explain why something is unconscious is more practical than to explain why something is conscious. To even grasp physicalism one usually makes observation of the function, dynamic, and structure. In addition, there is an explanation of what a thing does, how it changes over a period of time, and how it is assembled. However, even after a detailed explanation of the function, dynamic, and so on…one may still ask, why is it conscious, Thus, conscious presents a problem for physicalism. An explanation of consciousness is much more complex, and may even create a boundary of what physicalism can explain. Due to this problem, there are unanswered questions when it comes to physicalism.

in hand with the concepts as explained to us by Gyilym. The authors suggest that an

If we knew how consciousness comes to be and if that were from non-mentalistic physical features.

The fascination with consciousness dates back to the time of Plato and Descartes. Since those times the term “consciousness” has spurned controversy in many scientific fields, including the fields of biology, psychology, and neuroscience. However, with the recent advancements in brain imaging technologies, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG), human consciousness has shifted from being a subjective, abstract idea into being a observable scientific phenomenon. As neuroimaging capabilities progress, the public interest in consciousness also grows.

Consciousness allows a person to recognize their existence, and subsequently, to form their essence. The

BibliographyBooks1.Burt, C. (1962). The concept of consciousness. British Journal of Psychology, 53, 229-2422.Carlson, N., & Buskist, W. (1997). Psychology: The science of behavior (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

The reductionist system is just to lessen the human behavior & make life parts less requesting. Reductionists say that we have the most effortless way to deal with grasp & look deliberately to the minimum troublesome parts of the system. Each mind boggling structure is being made individual which are disengaged into the parts. Every reductionist envisions that they have educational power of the comprehensive humanism.

There are three levels of mind in the psychodynamic theory which are conscious, preconscious and unconscious. These are described below:

Ned Block has described consciousness as a mongrel concept (Block, 2002). What he means by this is that there are different types or concepts of consciousness that are often mixed together which lead to ambiguity. For the sake of conceptual clarity then I will adopt Block’s terminology and categorization of consciousness. In particular he distinguishes mainly between two types of consciousness, phenomenal consciousness (P-consciousness) and access-consciousness (A-consciousness). P-consciousness refers to consciousness of a subjective nature, access to experience, a perspective on what something is like.

Despite the current scientific and philosophical blockades, I will argue that the mind-body problem is soluble. The mind-body problem concerns how consciousness fits into the scientific and physical world. Consciousness seems to many to be irreducible past the point of subjective character experience. It is scientifically baffling at this point in time that the firing of neurons can give rise to this qualitative experience. Physicalists believe that everything can be explained once a language of perfect physics is developed; a seemingly logical conclusion given the constant overturning of previously believed non-physical facts by physics. However, as I will outline, respected philosophers such as Frank Jackson, Joseph Levine, Thomas Nagel and Colin McGinn believe that there are rational reasons to deny physicalism; their arguments complicate the solubility of the mind-body problem. I will explore each of those philosopher’s arguments below then move on to explain why I believe the mind-body problem is soluble. Firstly, I will briefly discuss physicalism, the most promising lead on route to the solution of the mind-body problem.

Even when it is defined it has no physical meaning involved. I am led to believe consciousness is not physical. For example is it physical when one knows right from wrong? Knowing happens in the mind, the mind is a part of one’s conscious. Therefore inferring knowing right from wrong is a conscious state of mind. When someone goes into the store and steals no matter the reason why, the action attaches itself to one’s conscious. The conscious is connected to memory so when someone remembers a bad action it takes a toll on their conscious.

Despite of the different perspectives from philosophers on whether animals have conscious or not, most animals are depicted as cognizant. This indicates that they can think; distinguish their own surrounding besides endure suffering and gratification (Griffin, 2001). The animals experience and understand in a different perspective as compared to human beings. Animals have different levels of consciousness whereby some poses higher and others lower mental perspectives

Brief solution of all problems that is indicated to be occur will be made in advance.

When the word consciousness is used regarding human beings, the word itself usually implies that those individuals are conscious of being conscious. Many individuals assume that the mind, the brain, and the body react as one. But the idea of the mind is not related to the concept of the brain or the body. These differences allow philosophers to determine a people’s consciousness in the world around them. Individuals derive the concept of consciousness from their experience because consciousness itself comes from one’s youth. Consciousness can be described as an individual’s ability to become aware of his or her surroundings including both the external and internal world which they are present in. The idea of consciousness can be explained by obtaining something simple and changing it into something complex, also known as the emergent property. The process of emergent property can be achieved in two steps that allow philosophers to determine who and what possess consciousness.