Compromises In The Northern And Southern States During The Years Of 1820-1860

America’s transformation into the country we live in today has been formed through numerous events during its short history but the event that will split the United States into North versus South is truly one of the most defining events in American history. Through numerous events leading up to the start of the Civil War, I will attempt to show how the United States was destined for conflict and that the Civil War was inevitable. The first way I will show how the war could not be avoided will deal with the issue of slavery. Slavery should be the first mentioned because many conflicts within the United States leading up to the Civil War and the division of the United States dealt with slavery. The Missouri Compromise should also be talked

During the period of 1820-1861 the north and south debated on issues that dealt with slavery and unbalance power, in order to reduce sectional tension between these two states, the Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act were proposed.

The Political Disputes of 1820-1860 compromised and then broke down.In the 1800’s slavery was the main conflict between the states. The compromise began to break down when slavery began in the North and the South. The Anti-Slavery Convention report that an American citizen who owns a human being into involuntary and is forced to be his property is a Man Stealer, which means immoral people. (Doc.B) Senator Henry Clay said that it is impossible that South Carolina ever desired a moment to become a separate and independent state.(Doc.A). Senator Daniel Webster’s Judgment is that the South is right and the North is wrong.(Doc.C). Georgia thinks all northern, and especially the New England, states are devoid of society fitted for well-bred Southern gentlemen.(Doc.E) Abraham Lincoln ambitious Northern politicians. (Doc.F) Henry Clay, National

As time passed the rapidly changing society in the nineteenth century, in 1820 the north and south began to have serious conflicting problems that were proved unfixable by compromise. During this time, the north underwent major social, economic, and industrial changes known as the Antebellum Period. While the south generally clung to king cotton and slavery and thus remained essentially the same. This arose a manifold of controversies with how issues such as tariffs, slavery, and land should be handled. Both the Union and the Confederacy tried to create compromises to resolve these problems, yet both sides were never completely satisfied no matter how hard they tried. This made it very close to impossible for them to completely put their

During the nineteenth century, America was facing internal conflicts. Both the South and North had many disagreements with each other, but they tried to make many compromises. By 1860, the possibility of compromises was no longer an option, and the United States was pushed into war within itself. One of the first times that the North and the South tried to make compromise was during the Missouri Compromise in 1819 to 1821.

In the early 1800’s, the US worked out issues, such as slavery, with compromises. The names of these compromises were, but not limited to, The Missouri Compromise, The Compromise of 1850, and Kansas Nebraska act. These were meant to appease the states without leading to secession. Later on, around 1860, the US compromises weren’t working well, and this lead to the secession. This was because the states wanted decisions and instant ends to issues such as slavery.

The Compromise of 1820 was an attempt to halt the expansion of slavery. Maine was added as a state but with a prior ruling stating the number of slave states must equal the number of non­slave states, Missouri was admitted as slave state with the agreement that future states (bought during the Louisiana Purchase) north of the latitude marking Missouri’s southern border would be free, while all future states south of the latitude would be open to slavery. But the Missouri Compromise did little to resolve the answer of slavery. The Kansas­Nebraska Act nullified the Missouri Compromise allowing the states to determine their slave status through popular sovereignty. The Missouri Compromise drew a specific line in the country which divided its

Prior to Civil War, distinct Northern and Southern cultures had been established; The free North occupied the commercial industry, while the slavery-based South undertook an agricultural occupation. The South and the North began to fight over right and wrong. The major issue was regarding slavery, as the South wanted to preserve slavery while, the North wanted to get rid of it. These conflicts rose into sectional antagonism and eventually put the United States and President Lincoln in a loophole. During the Civil War however, Lincoln made some extremely controversial decisions, that resulted in a reduction of the sectional antagonism present, and the United States became truly “one nation.”

The controversy over the extension of slavery into western territories contributed to the coming of the Civil War in many ways. Previously, the Missouri comprise admitted Missouri to the union as a slave state and Maine as a free state, preserving the fragile balance in Congress. However it did not apply to new territories that were not part of the Louisiana Purchase, and so the issue of slavery continued to fester as the nation expanded. During the election of 1848 slavery was a huge controversy. After two years of increasingly volatile debate over the issue, Kentucky Senator Henry Clay proposed another compromise to reduce tensions; Henry Clay had proposed ‘The Compromise of 1850’. The compromise was consisted into five parts; admit California

Slavery at this time, had grown to be an extremely controversial topic due to Southern beliefs of state’s rights and Northern morals. Southern states loved slavery due to the traditions, culture, and its’ economic power. Before the implementation of the Compromise, both sides were highly heated towards

After the Civil War, the United States had a lot of rebuilding to do. The war had halted the development of the country in its tracks, and many efforts had to be made to fix the economy, the physical state of the land and satisfy the needs and wants of the people. Integration of newly emancipated slaves, known as freedmen, and their safety was a question mark in the minds of many Americans, and ideas of how to fairly pull the South back into the Union were extremely varied amongst lawmakers. Compromise played a big role in keeping every side happy to prevent slipping back into war. It was prioritized that the North and South were blended back into one, united country, and many actions were taken in expediting this process.

In efforts to better understand the Civil War most historians examine the Sectional Crisis and the Compromise of 1850 in the decades leading up to the worst years in American History. Some historians prefer to focus on the underlying theme of the war, others tightly examine individual leaders, events, and political parties, connecting them all together like puzzle pieces to define the years prior to the war. Despite the contrasting views, it is clear to realize the constant prevailing issues of the Antebellum Period, the Sectional Crisis and the Compromise of 1850. In particular, the Compromise of 1850 is deceivingly taught as only establishing 3 pivotal elements: the status of slavery in future territories (popular sovereignty), California statehood, and the fugitive slave law. Granted these elements of the compromise provide a great amount of controversy long after their birth, but one element of the compromise perceives to fail in obtaining recognition. The Texas-New Mexico boundary resolution seems to find itself fading away from its relevancy to the civil war, shadowed by more prominent issues regarding the stability of the Union. Abandoning the traditional teaching of the compromise, the Texas-New Mexico border decision figuratively and literally changed the identity of Texas. This was the long awaited result caused by deep rooted social and political issues dating back to the Texas Revolution.

Although one should compromise when they can, that option should not always be entertained. In various cases, the immediate inclination to settle with the opposition has led to cataclysmic consequences. Furthermore, that scenario has played out in numerous occasions in history, one notable instance being the compromises on the subject of slavery from the United States which resulted in the outbreak of the American Civil War. While numerous individuals at this time, especially politicians, accepted the compromises as a solution to war, some men such as William Lloyd Garrison, refused to believe in any reasonable compromise in the subject matter. In addition, the controversy of compromise occurs in the 21st century, although it has proven

As tensions between the North and the South rose on the issues of slavery and states’ rights, numerous compromises were proposed to ease the conflict. Such compromises included the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Crittenden Compromise. These compromises had intentions of defining where slavery was permitted and clarifying states’ rights. They were only temporary fixes to a more pressing issue. Between the Missouri Compromise and the Crittenden Compromise, a series of events changed the political atmosphere of the United States and prevented any more compromises on the institution of slavery from being passed.

During the time around 1850, tensions were rising on the issue of slavery between the North and the South. New states were being admitted to the United States, but the decisions to make them a free state or a slave state were what really mattered. As an example, California was admitted to the Union as a free state, and this angered the south very much because slavery was a very important factor to the South's economy. The Compromise of 1850 was developed to help soothe the tensions on each side. This Compromise had several provisions: California was admitted to the Union as a free state; the territories of New Mexico and Utah were created without restrictions of slavery; the slave trade was abolished in Washington, D.C.; Congress passed a stricter fugitive slave law. This compromise showed just how important slavery was to each side, and it gives us a good idea of why it could be important as one of their goals during the Civil War. With slavery in mind, it brought about ideas of succession to the South. Because the South was scared of Lincoln abolishing slavery, they thought it would be a wise decision to secede from the Union. In fact, Lincoln had no plans of abolishing slavery, but stated that it should not spread to the territories. The South basically misunderstood and decided to secede anyway. The reason slavery was so important to the South, and lead them to break apart from the Union was that it