preview

Comparison Of The Articles Of Confederation Vs. Constitution Of 1787

Decent Essays

According to Hubbard-Brown (2007), “At the time the Constitution was written, there was no such thing as the “American people”—only scattered groups of people that needed to be brought into a larger whole” (p. 81).
Articles of Confederation vs. Constitution of 1787 The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution of 1787 had many differences from one another. The Articles of Confederation were “America’s first constitutional government in effect from 1781-1788. The articles created a weak decentralized form of government that lacked the power to tax and compel state obedience to treaties if negotiated” (Keene, J. D., Cornell, S., & O'Donnell, E.T. 2013, p. 154). The Constitution of 1787, which happened in Philadelphia, allowed all states to be invited to debate and ratify this Constitution. This was the time the government divided into different sectors, which included the judicial, executive, and legislative branch. Even though the Articles of Confederation gave sovereignty to the states, it was not working as efficiently as they hoped for and several issues arose. The confederate congress could not solve the nation’s problems because of lack of money from not being able to tax without representation. Without this tax money, there was a lack of funds to pay for wars and uphold a powerful navy. The American economy declined into a depression and caused military challenges that occurred due to lack of diplomacy.
Piracy became a very serious problem from the lack of a

Get Access