Comparison Of Creation Myths And Traditions

In the two creation myths of the Osage and Navarro, there are several differences. A major example of this is the origin of humans. In the Osage Creation Account, humans reside in the sky until the mythical Elk helps the human rid water from the landmasses that they would eventually inhabit. The Navarro creation myth states that humans resided inside of the earth and that Badger, another mystical personified animal, helped them reach the surface. Both of the Native American tribes all seem to have the same basic belief, that they are connected to nature and are polytheistic, but lack certain common details. This variety in belief is the result of the environment that they inhabit.

Creation in Ancient Egyptian religion can be much different than the creation account taken from The Bible. Genesis has a set description of “The Beginning” while there are several different versions and variations in Egyptian mythology. The versions range from a “one god” myth (Ptah; see picture) to the more common creator out of Nun, which in itself has several derivations.

I have found that both Native Creation Stories and Genesis are similar because they both believed in a higher power. They were also similar because in both, the Gods wanted humans to reflect their personal image.   For example, in The Native American Legends, Creation of First Man and First Woman: A Navajo Legend, the God states “We want to make people who look more like us; the new humans will have hands and feet like ours.” In Genesis 1:26, Then God said, “Let Us make man in Our image, according to Our likeness.”

Throughout the world, there exists thousands of cultures and myths, separated from each other by thousands of miles and geographic barriers, by some means these cultures share countless symbols. To understand why the Judeo-Christian myth of Genesis, Shinto creation myth, and Hindu creation myth and the Mahabharata are so comparable an individual must understand how these stories formed and changed over time. Myths, originally told orally by storytellers were formed to explain the world and beliefs of their respective individuals. One must also understand that if myths are viewed literally the imagery is distinct but when examined figuratively the symbolism shown is identical. It is evident that certain symbols and motifs transcend human

I enjoyed reading your post for this week’s assignment. The revolutionary Christian health administrator uses influence to “seek out champions”. Wakesha, you discussed a great analogy in your discussion thread for this week’s assignment. You discussed the analogy of being a “fruit inspector” from the parable of Matthew 7:16-20. Matthew 7:16-20 discusses how to recognize a tree by the fruit it bear. An apple tree can’t produce an orange. An orange tree cannot produce an apple. The revolutionary Christian health administrator must inspect each person to see what unique qualities they possess when in search of seeking out champions. Great post, Wakesha and God bless you.

While the tensions between the early European settlers and Native Americans of North America denotes that the cultures had extreme differences, their writings do not necessarily illustrate that belief. Both the Native Americans and the Puritans wrote about a creator and how that creator related to humans. Native Americans wrote creation myths, which tell us how they described the creation of Earth and how earth’s beings were created. Two specific groups who wrote creation myths were the Inuit and the Mayan Indians. Settlers such as William Bradford, wrote and kept a journal to document the first landing of the Pilgrims. The Puritans, however, wrote poems about their god and how this god interacted with life on Earth. The Puritans wrote about their god in a more hidden way since creativity or other dangerous expressions were frowned upon. Whether the creator was a Raven (Inuits), a Feathered Spirit and a maker (Mayan), or a human-like God (Puritans) all cultures sought this creator for guidance. Each culture had different perceptions of this creator as it related to mankind; Native Americans regarded their

In the book of Genesis, we are introduced to everything. From the creation stories to the sagas in between Genesis is an opening to the old testament and an opening to the book of exodus. This essay will contrast each creation story and describe each stories interest, explain how Genesis 12: 1-3 links the stories of 2: 4b-11 with the ancestral narratives in 12-50 and connect the sagas of Abraham/Sarah, Isaac/ Rebecca and Jacob/ Racheal.

Concerning the three most important creation myths in my opinion. The first would be the idea that the world started as a ball of rock or basically nothing and was turned into what it is today by one or more gods or goddesses being killed or just simply become the earth. The second is the idea that people and plants were made from natural resources such as rock, mud, clay, and more. The third is the idea that there was a bloody struggle or war for power over the earth or the universe. There are many other motifs like heros, monster, and other creatures that are involved in creating what is now earth. Another is bloody warfare which is seen quite often in the creation myths. In my opinion the three creation myths I have chosen are the most important. In the next three paragraphs I will explain what they mean and why they are used so often in so many creation myths.

Throughout the plot of these four creation stories, it is visible that each culture has varying beliefs on how land was developed. For example, Cherokee Indians conclude that land was created by a water beetle who sculpted soft mud, where as Hawaiians believe that land emerged from the slime in the ocean. Both Europeans and West Africans teach that a supreme being used his or her powers to form land. In Genesis, God was responsible for the land, whereas in the Golden Chain story, a creature called Obatala was deemed accountable for creating the land. One similarity betweens these stories is that they all begin in an almost identical setting. In every myth except for

One reason that both Greek and Genesis creation stories are different is because the Gods in both stories create the universe in different ways. For example, “one half of the shell rose into the air and became the sky and the other became the earth.”(Greek) another example is, “in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.” This shows that both stories are different because the earth was created in different way in both stories. Another difference that both creation stories have is that they both have different amounts of time in which they created the earth. For example, “with the wing she laid a golden egg and for ages she sat upon the egg.”(Greek) another example is “God saw all that he made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning – the sixth day.” This shows that both creation stories are different because it took ages to create the world in the Greek creation story, but in Genesis it only took 7 days to make the

There were plenty of differences in each myth. The Greek myth was filled to the brim with gods and goddesses whose lives intertwined with one another. It was also packed with different versions of myths including the world being created by a woman, serpent, and cosmic egg. In the Hawaiian creation myth, it seems that the Earth was already there when Kumulipo and Po’ele started creating plants and animals. This myth does not go into detail about how the Earth was created. Finally, in the Ute myth Manitou lived in the sky with nothing around but the sun and clouds suggesting He-She created the world. He-She created the world from a hole unlike female-serpent relationship in the Greek myth that suggests some form conception.

Broad themes are found often in stories, broad outlooks, and day-to-day events. Native American myths all include similar themes like the importance of competition and that good and evil create a balanced world. These themes, and many more, are common for the people of today just as much as the people of hundreds of years ago. Many of the customs, religions, and ideals from ancient Indian civilizations are similar to people today, making us much more alike than different from those who came before us.

Myths – as they are known to most of the world – give insight into the pasts of various countries and religions as the people saw them. They have been used to explain phenomenons in nature or describe the tales of courageous and important men and women throughout history. Creation myths in particular define how the Earth itself was created, along with the universe, heavens, hell, people, and creatures that exist today. Genesis of Christian mythology, for instance, tells the story of how the single deity God spoke and formed everything from day and night to man and woman. Various African creation myths, such as with the Yoruba, explain the creation of the Earth through at least a couple gods working together and all life

Throughout history many civilizations and cultures have had their own ways of explaining the world and its creation. Each of these civilizations has created unique descriptions and accounts of such events. However, when comparing them to each other, are they really different? Look at the ancient Greco - Roman creation myths as told by Hesiod in his Theogony and Works and Days and Ovid’s Metamorphoses, when compared to the creation myths as seen in the Old Testament’s book of Genesis they may not be as different as one would think. Taking a more in-depth look at both Genesis and Hesiod’s and Ovid’s work more closely, the reader can see that on multiple occasions the myths have almost identical similarities which reflect their views in

Compare and contrast the Biblical creation myths with other creation myths from Greece and the Ancient Near East.