This modules covers four different types of society’s that empires have used throughout history. First is the Plural society used in Constantinople by the Byzantine Empire. Where a common religion such as Islam rules allows other religions to exist but in turn taxes them for not converting. Second is the unitary approach used by the Aztecs in Tenochtitlan and then the Spanish that eventually conquered them. This approach only allows a single religion to exist and does its best to rid the world of competing religions. Third is the capitalist way used by the Dutch in Amsterdam, This approach offers the most freedom since the rulers are focused more on expansion and the people’s well-being than conforming to any religion. Last is the synthetic system used by the Mughal Empire in the city of Delhi. The most idealist way that allows everyone to get along is by taking the best aspect of every religion and combing them all into a single new …show more content…
By allowing remnants of conquered cities to continually existing while still being taxed. They were able to conquer cities at a faster rate and replenish population faster than a unitary society would be capable of doing. A unitary society operates better on a local scale than a worldwide one. In villages and etcetera they would benefit more from having a single religion due to everyone sharing common interests but that is a weakness on a world wide scale as the Aztecs found out the hard way. Third would be the capitalist society where the driving force is money rather than acting on god’s whims. The Dutch expansion of the 1600’s proved that this society of the most advantages for its rulers. Finally is the synthetic society type used by the Mughal’s. Before that empire fell to religious fundamentalists it was one of the strongest empires in the region and could have possible lived on longer if it was able to follow its path for
Most societies that developed in ancient civilizations were centered around some form of imperial administration and Imperial Rome (31 B.C.E.-476 C.E.) and Han China (206 B.C.E.-220 C.E.) were no different in this sense. Both civilizations had a network of cities and roads, with similar technologies that catalyzed cultural amalgamation and upgraded the standard of living, along with comparable organizational structures. Additionally, both civilizations had problems managing their borders and used similar tactics for defense. However, the Chinese Emperor was interpreted as a God while the Roman Emperor was a lugal, or big man, who had to fight not only to gain power, but to push through his initiatives. The similarities and differences
The Rome and Han empires were two very influential empires that have their parallels as well as differences in terms of the rise, stability, and downfall. They were seen as some of the greatest empires of their time and each had their own way of getting to that spot with some similarities. The same applies to their stability. Their downfall had some very similar aspects to it such as corruption and invasions by neighboring lands as well as other factors but a very distinct fact that the Han rose again, not Rome. Their events may have their similarities but they had different methods of doing things as well.
The Roman and Han Empires were among the greatest empires in history. The Han prospered in 202 BCE - 220 C.E and the Roman Empire in 27 BCE- 476 C.E. By the early second century CE, Rome controlled the entire Mediterranean coastline and had to use military force to set up borders against their adversaries, the Huns. During the Han, colonies were established in Korea and military campaigns were mounted in order to control their neighbors, the Xiongnu. Both of these empires had similar rises by using strong military power and expansion, which helped them both strive in economic trade. Although there are many similarities in the reasons that contributed to the rise of these empires, there are also several contrasting reasons for their decline. These two empires differ because Rome allowed plague to end their empire while the Han kept ruling.
It is a well known fact that the Mughal empire is one of the three gunpowder empires. They are called this because they strong militaries used gunpowder. The three gunpowder empires controlled parts of Europe, Asia, and Africa. But the Mughals land covered mostly India.
In the distance across the land was four civilizations. These civilizations were known as the Akkadians, the Babylonians, the Assyrians and finally the Neo-Babylonians. All of the civilizations that lived in mesopotamia rose and fell like the sun.
European empires that conquered the Americas differed from other empires such as the Russian empire, Chinese empire, Mughal empire, and Ottoman empire. While the Europeans continued to conquer across oceans, Chinese empires remained closer to the region while expanding to countries such as Tibet and Mongolia. European empires were similar to the Mughal and Ottoman empire by trying to influence other people's belief and convert them to either Christianity or Islam. They were both forceful in their methods. The Europeans gave them Christianity for labor, the Ottomans would force Christian boys to participate in the empire and convert to Islam.
Have you ever wondered the difference in ancient civilizations? I am going to tell you about the differences in these civilizations; Rome, China, and Persia. Two of these places are still here, but the other was taken over and is no longer in existence. Though these places are old, they have played a big part in the growth of humanity. They have played a major part in our culture, religion, and everyday activities. Many of the things that we do today are based upon what they did way back in these times. Without Rome, China, and Persia: Do you think we would be the same as we are today? They are all different, but they have one thing in common, they helped evolve the human species.
During the 17th to 18th century, The Roman Empire had gone through a cultural and religious metamorphous. Throughout this time, the roles of religion in the Islamic, Byzantine and Western European worlds altered the period of 600-750 with their similarities adhering to monotheism for one, and differences in regards to perspectives. These three cultures were all pretty diverse but they also shared some of the same roots and became heritors of the Roman Empire, built on different ideologies. The different ideologies of the Islamic, Byzantine and Western European worlds, consisted of different founders, places, and elements of worship, thus portraying how religion was indeed prominently central to governmental and social structures because of the large impact towards political laws.
The early modern empires in the Americas, Russia, and Asia are appropriate to compare, as they all built massive empires that transformed many societies. Russia became "an Asian as well as a European power" (618) and "created an empire, simular to those of Western Europe in terms of conquest, settlement, exploitation, religious conversion, and feelings of superiority." (638) In Asia, under the Qing Dynasty, there was much less of an impact on conquered people than there was in the empires of America. The Qing "did not seek to assimilate local people into Chinese culture and showed considerable respect." (640) The biggest difference between the American empires and the Russia/Asian empires was the process the Europeans
The rise and fall of different civilizations and empires is caused by various social, political, and cultural factors that affect its societies. One of the most important concepts seen in empires are the creation of its culture and its relation to the beliefs of its society. Religion plays an enormous role in understanding the purpose behind the actions of the people in a civilization. Religion and culture are dependent of each other as it reflects the ideas and values that society has agreed upon. As a new urban civilization during 2500 B.C, The Indus Valley Civilization created a sociopolitical system that
Religion is a fundamental element of human society. It is what binds a country, society or group of individuals together. However, in some instances it destroys unity amoungst these. Religion is a belief in a superhuman entity(s) which control(s) the universe. Every religion has its differences but most strive for a just life and the right morals. The three major groups are the primal regions which consist of African, Aboriginal and Native American religions, Asian which consist of South Eastern Asian religions and Abrahamic religions which consist of Middle Eastern religions. The foci of this essay are the differences between the Abrahamic religion, Christianity, and the Asian region Buddhism as well as making reference to the Islamic
It is universally known that religious faiths creates diversity in culture and give new identity and outlook to matters signifying a new way life. In most cases, religious faith is accountable for people’s behavior in conducting daily activities including business, work, socialization, and cultural functions within a specified community. The immensely large majority of the human species has always looked to a higher power for acceptance, love, enlightenment, guidance, and even sometimes discipline. There are many different religions with many different practices and beliefs, however, in this paper I will be comparing and contrasting the belief on who is worshiped as the “higher power” as well as
The accomplishments and success of civilizations are closely linked to their religious outlook and the role of religion in their governments and society. Throughout history rulers have used the influence of religions to control their populations and provide the justification for their power. A society with a greater degree of separation between religion and government promotes a superior level of liberty and creativity amongst its people. By the time of the decline of the Roman Empire in the west, however, the world had come full circle to a return to theocratic dictatorship.
Chau’s thesis that the rise and fall of empires was due to tolerance, inclusion, difference, and diversity is shown to be true of the Roman Empire because of the way that tolerance allowed and caused the empire to rise, enter its golden age, and fall. The Roman Empire was a “hyperpower” that lasted from 44 BCE to 476 CE. The empire contained Western, Southern, and Eastern Europe, along with North Africa; thus, there was an abundance of culture from many different conquered groups. Romans wanted to make these conquered nations provinces of Rome. The Roman Empire began (and the Roman Republic ended) with the assassination of Julius Caesar, who wanted to be a dictator. No longer a republic, the lands already ruled by Rome became part of an empire. The government became centralized with a single ruler, the emperor. However, even before the empire, during the Republic, there was also the similar feeling of wanting to conquer other nations was there.
Foreign trade is one of the most important aspects of Asian and European Empires. Without trade, these empires would not have flourished in the manner that they did. Many different factors played a role in developing trade in their cultures. As various empires ruled from 2000 BC to 1911 in Asia and Europe, trade has had a major influence in the development of those cultures as seen today. The nation that has the most success in trading becomes the strongest nation and will last the longest.