preview

Comparing The Usual Suspects And L. A. Confidential

Good Essays

As a genre popularized post-WWII, film noir was groundbreaking in the cinematography realm. Touching upon subjects such as violence and sexuality, it was an opportunity for filmmakers to explore heavier themes where the “good guy” didn’t always win. The Usual Suspects (Singer 1995) follows a group of five men who have previously been convicted of crimes. As the story unfolds, viewers come to realize the truth as the intricate web of lies is slowly unpacked. Starring faces such as Benicio del Toro and Stephen Baldwin, this movie is a perfect example of modern film noir (also known as neo-noir). L.A. Confidential (Hansen, 1997) focuses on the other side of crime. Set in Los Angeles, California circa 1953, this film follows three vastly different police …show more content…

These three men have to work together to solve crime around the city of Los Angeles while trying not to lose their morals. In The Usual Suspects and L.A. Confidential, the filmmakers’ use of high-contrast lighting exposes the corruption and darkness of humanity, and the use of framing represents the psychological effects on the characters and audience. Lighting is a huge part of film noir and neo-noir. Not only can it emphasize emotion and create a certain mood for the atmosphere, it can also symbolize exposure and revelation. In The Usual Suspects, light is used to reveal details that would otherwise be unknown to the audience and other characters. An example of this is when Keyser Söze comes to kill Dean Keaton during the very first scene of the movie. After shooting Keaton once in the back, Söze walks up to him as he lays on the floor. As he lights a cigarette, the light from the flame illuminates his face just enough for Dean to realize who he was all along. Another big part of lighting is visual sparsity, which is employed during this scene as we have no idea who Keyser Söze is at this

Get Access