Comparing The Islamic Republic And Iran

Ataturk and Reza Shah had a large influence on the governments of Turkey and Iran by secularizing and westernizing each. This secularization has had a distinct role in shaping the language, education, religion and government of both Turkey and Iran. Their end goals were to create a powerful and prevalent world powers that is distinct. Comparing the two countries, there were many similarities between each reformation, but each is distinct in certain aspects.

It was a bright and sunny day in the streets of Tehran, where my father would walk along side by side with the love of his life. He was dressed like any gentleman in the blistering summer’s heat would, but the real sight to him was his girlfriend. She was wearing a bright colored dress and her hair was swaying with the cool wind. They felt vigorous and young to be able to show their affection so freely. Despite that, times have changed in Iran and to practice that type of freedom would result in brutal consequences from the government. At first glance, one would say modern day Iran juxtaposes the United States. However, that was not always the case. According to my informant, my father, Iran was once a country very much like the United States

Iran a place located east of Iraq and Saudi Arabia, and west of Afghanistan (“Where is Iran”). Iran is having a revolution with its people because Mohammad Khatami, fifth president of Ian lost to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in the presidential elections held in June 2009, former Prime Minister Mir Hussein Mousavi accused the new president Mohammad Khatami of rigging the vote. Soon after the announcement that President Mahmoud Ahmadiejad rigged the election, Green Revolution started where thousands of young people of Iran storm though the streets to protest against President Mahmoud Ahmadiejad. But the revolution did not last very long all thanks to its military, Green Revolution was over and more than 500 young Iranians has been capture for

How can states in different regions of the world be similar? Russia and Iran are an example of this because they are both similar in the type of regime they have but yet are completely different. The way a regime rules a state makes vastly different people fit in the same category. Each state, Russia and Iran, have institutions in regards to where they fall in the model of how they rule. Iran and Russia have different methods of co-optation for their regimes. Russia and Iran fit in the models of nondemocratic rule, the state institutions of nondemocratic rule, and the methods of co-optation in the regimes will be explored.

Many countries generally such as Saudi Arabia and Iran specifically hate each particularly other in a subtle way. This definitely is really due mostly to really religious differences, which generally is quite significant. Both countries really are Muslim but there particularly are different types of Muslim which actually hold different beliefs in a subtle way. These different beliefs split Saudi Arabia and Iran apart in a subtle way. Saudi Arabia and Iran literally have differences which causes conflict, or so they basically thought. Religion for the most part is a particularly key difference between Saudi Arabia and Iran in a subtle way. After Prophet Muhammad died, his followers split into different beliefs, or so they definitely thought. Sunni Muslims definitely believe that anyone can generally be caliph, which mostly is fairly significant. Shia’s on the really other hand essentially believe that the caliph definitely has to for the most part be a descendant of Muhammad, or so they basically thought. Saudi Arabia really is Sunni while Iran mostly is Shia, so this for all intents and purposes is basically due mostly to definitely religious differences, for all intents and purposes contrary to popular belief. The Islam religion specifically was founded by Mohammed in a subtle way. Sunni Muslims for all intents and purposes believe the leader can basically be anyone, which kind of is quite significant. Shia Muslims for all intents and purposes believe that the leader

Turkey and Iran are both countries that emerged out of the debris of long, Islamic empires. Both nations were truly founded post-World War I: Turkey from the Ottoman Empire and Iran from the Safavids then the Qajars. These empires had kept their two regions extremely stable, and the stability of Islam lasted them both until their downfalls. Post-World War I, the recently founded nations began to move in a new direction: towards secular, Western-style government. Atatürk, the founder of Turkey, and Reza Shah, the founder of Iran, secularized their governments and attempted to modernize their nations by following Western models. However, the path of these two nations soon split, as Turkey became an extremely

Before adopting the name Iran in 1935, the country was known as Persia. At this point, Raza Kahn became Shah, or emperor of Iran. Kahn ruled as an autocrat until being forced to step down in order for his son, Mohammed Raza Pahlavi, to take the throne at the beginning of World War 2. During World War 2, Iran became occupied by British and Russian forces, but was largely absent in any participation in fighting the war. The Iranian government attempted fairly successfully to avoid combat, and with it the probable demise of the nation during the war. Following World War 2, in 1950, Iran saw the brief rule of Prime Minister Ali Razamara. Razamara was assassinated merely nine months after coming into power, and was followed by Mohammad Mossadeq. In 1951, Iranian parliament voted to nationalize domestic oil exports. However, as the oil industry in Iran was still largely controlled by the British, Britain imposed an embargo on all oil exports, demonstrating its power in manipulating the Iranian economy. The Shah was forced to flee the country as

There are precious few similarities between the political systems of the two civilizations; in fact they were basically opposite of each other. The Persian Empire had been ruled by a King from a central location; but the size of the Empire was so large that he wasn't able to effectively rule alone. He got a number of governors called Satraps to rule in his stead in different provinces. The Satraps were almost always Persian, but he did let the local officials to be chosen from local people with local language and customs. To keep insurrections or treason from happening, he employed a secret police system known as the "eyes and ears of the King" that gave him information of events in the far reaches of his Empire. The Greek poleis were each

The Iranian Revolution in 1979 was the events leading to the overthrow of the unfit leader Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi. The Shah came to power during World War II and became the last monarch in the House of Pahlavi. While ruling, he introduced policies like the White Revolution, which were political and economical reforms that claimed to be beneficial and grant women's suffrage, nationalization of some industries, and a way to make Iran a global power. But the Shah lost support first from the Shi’a muslims and the working class because of his strict ways in things like modernization and secularization. The Shah then lost all support and was overthrown on January 7th, 1979 and after, the monarchy was abolished leading to the Islamic Republic.

The Iranian revolution was an ideological affair. With different visions for the future of Iran, the revolutionaries were united for toppling the monarchy, which they had substantially. All the visions of these revolutionary, however, were colored by ideology. Ayatollah Khomeini was the leader of that Iranian revolution against the shah. Khomeini marched with Shi’ite (Shiyah) Ideology to denounce the Shahs and created a negative impression among the Iranian People against the Shah’s regime. The Shi’ite Ideologies were based on Islamic shariah, The Iranian culture was based on Islamic culture with an increasing influence of western culture and the shah’s regime was friendly with the western culture & policies and mostly against the Shi’ite & Islamic fundamentalism. The second difference was, shi’ite (shiyah) ideology doesn’t support the monarchy or imperialism in Islamic countries, the Iranian culture in that time were divided in their ideology in between shi’ite (Shiyah) and shahs, and the shah’s regime was totally a monarchy and supported by the US and western policy makers. This difference was also mostly liable for the Iranian revolution. The third and last variation was, the Shi’ite (Shiyah) ideologies tends to follow the shariyah,

Rolling emerald hills covered in ballik cedars and black pines, caress the southern border of Turkey. The forested mountains stretch from northern Syria and Iraq to western Iran. Thick vegetation and modest streams seep across the region, nurturing the land. Further south, closer to the charred heart of Iran, the rich foliage and underbrush disappear; the expanse stretches out into a long desert of sand and debris. It is here, among the ruins of a wrecked village, where the women stand, tall and unflinching. Each one cradles a shining rifle. They’d look proud if their thoughts’ weren’t haunted by the pale faces of their martyrs. If it wasn’t for the dried blood caked on their skin and cheeks, they’d look almost normal.

Islam is the backbone of the Middle Eastern country if Iran. Islam has made Iran the country that it is today. The vast 91% of Muslims impact Iran immensely (Religion: Culture grams). Many of these reasons are “ by mistake “. Islam affects Iran in three major points.

America is home to a creative freedom that citizens of other countries are not as fortunate to have. With rules telling them how to dress, what to believe in , not exposing themselves to life outside Iran, gaining knowledge becomes hard to achieve. For those who must live with imprisoning boundaries forced upon them individualism is almost impossible. Living in Iran, around the time when the revolution took place was no different from living in a cave. In “They’ve been there since childhood, fixed in the same place... able to see only in front of them..” Plato just described the lives of many characters from Persepolis (Plato Pg 514). Marjane is much like the man that left the cave and came back to enlighten his fellow prisoners.

Various factors influenced the 1979 Iranian revolution, but at the core of this significant event was Islamic fundamentalism. The Iranian religious leader, Ayatollah Khomeini, led this movement to end the thirty-seven-year reign of Mohammad Reza Shah Pahlavi, also known as the Shah of Iran (Diller 1991, p.152). The revolution was a combination of mounting social, economic, political and religious strains. The nation of Iran was never colonized, unlike some of its bordering countries, making its people intolerant of external influences. The Shah had gradually westernized and secularized his country, creating a strong American presence that was being felt

Iran is a very complicated country that is heading towards many domestic and foreign changes. Some foreign changes that can be predicted in Iran’s future will include a foreign relations change with the United States and Israel. The relationship with the United States will improve with the negotiations of a nuclear deal. With an improving relations between the United States and Iran, Israel thinks it will lose its qualitative edge on Iran. Therefore, the Israel and Iran relation will worsening. Coming back inside the country, a domestic change will be a more democratic government. However, in order for Iran to push for a more democratic future, it will have to go through lots of political unrest and civil protests. Iran will have to see some dark days filled with protests. Iran is on the path for a more democratic government, improving U.S. relations, and declining Israel relations.