preview

Comparing The Frog Prince By Robert Coover And Joyce Thomas

Decent Essays

It has been debated on whether or not the transformation from a slam on a wall to a kiss shows female empowerment in the various versions of “The Frog Prince.” Modern writers have expressed their stance on how the kiss functions within the story to “transform” characters and deliver them to their “happily ever after.” Other implications of the kiss would be it’s ability to serve as a means of empowerment for women and whether it aids to overcome the patriarchy. Robert Coover’s and Joyce Thomas’s versions of “The Frog Prince” offer two contemporary perspectives on the transformation of the “prince” and “princess” and the resulting “happily ever after.” Robert Coover’s The Frog Prince is a reinforcement of the gender/sex role expectations because the main female character is dependent on the man for her means of a “happily ever after.” There was not a kiss to …show more content…

In fact, in The Frog Prince poem, she excludes the kiss entirely and instead keeps the original wall slam scene which she equates to being equal to the kiss in terms of power -- “Hate transforms the same as love…” The frog “would be a human at any price” just to be with the princess, to lay in her bed, to have their contract sealed “with her lips.” So rather than love, he is transformed by hate as his entrails was splatter on the wall. “The frog pops out a prince, someone she can now love.” with kind eyes that still hold evidence of the animal he once was. However, “Dropped ball, // the sun sinks over the rim,// his cousins’ kettle chorus //rifling a shut door.” The ball, seen as a symbol of innocence in the original version, is dropped not at the beginning of their encounter, but towards the end as daylight starts to fade. This can signify a loss of innocence. The “rifling a shut door” can also be interpreted as loss of that innocence. Hate transforms into love and the two live happily ever

Get Access