preview

Comparing The Friar And The Chaucer In The Canterbury Tales

Decent Essays

Everybody loves a good story, but what is it that makes a story “good”? For the Host in The Canterbury Tales by Geoffrey Chaucer there are two requirements to truly tell a worthwhile story. “That is to say who gives the fullest measure of good morality and general pleasure…” is the one who tells the best story (Chaucer 24). The Friar and the Monk each get a turn to tell a story in the competition for a free meal, but as with all good competitions there can only be one winner. The Friar’s tale would win against the Monk’s because although it is of equal morals, it is far more entertaining. The Monk’s tale has what can be considered a high set of morals by anybody’s standards. The Monk’s tale is a combination of tragedies about “...people that stood in great prosperity and were cast down out of their high degree...” (Chaucer 189). At first glance it may seem that the tragedies have no sense of morality as they depict despicable people living a life that most can only hope to know, but one would quickly find that isn’t at all the case. Each individual tale shows the highest degree of morality as each of these people receive what they …show more content…

The tale depicts a summoner who “... knew so much of bribery and blackmail I should be two years telling you the tale”(Chaucer 295). He travels around getting rich off of everyone he can, but much like the Monk’s tale the good fortune of the wicked doesn’t last. The summoner makes an alliance with a demon and ends up being taken to Hell by the very same demon when a widow wishes for the devil to take him away. The Friar quickly paints a tale of morality as the summoner is allowed a chance to repent before being dragged away to the depths of Hell “... where summoners have their special shelf”, but he has no such intent (Chaucer 302). The Friar adds a strong finish to an increasingly moral tale as he ends with a plea that some day summoners will change their evil

Get Access