preview

Comparing The Bell Jar And The Catcher In The R

Decent Essays

The Bell Jar is a partly fictionalized autobiographical account of author Sylvia Plath’s life. Plath, personified as Esther Greenwood details the inequality and expectations of a young woman in 1950s American society on her journey to find purpose. The Bell Jar holds many similarities to J. D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, both detailing the difficulties of growing up and all that comes along with it, with The Bell Jar specifically exploring a more feminine side of adolescence. Themes of women's rights in The Bell Jar are documented in depth by Plath throughout the novel holding relevance to the context of the novel’s setting as well as the current day state of women's rights. These key ideas are harmful societal expectations of a woman …show more content…

Throughout the novel she speaks of her desires to travel the world and make a life for herself, however with that usually comes the depressing realization that she will most likely have to give up her own personal goals and ambitions to fulfil the “ordinariness” of being stay-at-home-housewife role - the stereotypical societal expectation of a woman. During one of her outings she expresses her ambitions for the future and discontentedness toward the expectations of being a housewife through her narration of her internal monologue, stating “That’s [ordinariness] one of the reasons I never wanted to get married. The last thing I wanted was infinite security and to be the place an arrow shoots off from. I wanted change and excitement and to shoot off in all directions myself.” However during her various erratic outbursts of determination, she disregards this individualistic view succumbing to the prospect of giving up her own aspirations for a man, saying that “I was my own woman. The next step was to find the proper sort of man.” My personal notice on Esther’s empowered attitude of not needing nor wanting the metaphorical ‘safety net’ of a man and children I found to be profoundly contradictory in comparison to her other altruistic attitude …show more content…

Buddy immortalizes everything that the atypical breadwinning man of the 1950s was - masculine, religious, attractive and promising in his studies. The mistreatment of women in 1950s era America is embodied in Buddy’s views on Esther’s own ambitions of being “a famous poet” or a “brilliant professor.” Buddy dismisses her, “saying in a sinister, knowing way that after I [Esther] had children I would feel differently, I wouldn't want to write poems any more.” Under the guise of the perfect man withdraws his true bigoted attitude. The subversion, almost mockery of Esther’s goals serves as an observation of the truly smug prick Buddy is, carrying a bloated self importance and complete disregard for Esther's own aspirations. Buddy’s ignorant persona has been purposefully crafted by Plath as a personification of society’s own attitudes toward women. The underminement of female capability can be attributed to influence of the patriarcal hand alike that of Buddy on Esther, but to a larger scale. This attitude as a result has been ingrained in our own society’s cultures. As a female student, I can see the clear gendered divide because of the lack of positive expectations put on youth. I can identify the favouring of males in certain educational courses or jobs, as well as the conventional roles placed on women - again referring to the stereotypical male

Get Access